

Supreme Court Briefs: Martin v. Boise and Grants Pass v. Johnson
Interactive Video
•
Social Studies
•
9th - 10th Grade
•
Practice Problem
•
Hard
Jennifer Brown
FREE Resource
10 questions
Show all answers
1.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
What was the main argument of the six homeless individuals in the Martin v. Boise case?
The law violated their right to privacy.
The law was discriminatory against minorities.
The law violated the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.
The law was not enforced equally across the city.
2.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
What was the outcome of the Martin v. Boise case in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals?
The court dismissed the case.
The court ruled in favor of the homeless individuals.
The court ordered a retrial.
The court ruled in favor of the city of Boise.
3.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
What did the city of Grants Pass fail to provide, leading to a lawsuit?
Adequate public transportation
Decent homeless shelters
Affordable housing options
Job opportunities for the homeless
4.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
What was the main legal argument against Grants Pass in the U.S. District Court?
Violation of the Fourth Amendment
Violation of the Second Amendment
Violation of the Eighth Amendment and Due Process Clause
Violation of the First Amendment
5.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
What was the Supreme Court's decision regarding the Grants Pass case?
The Court ruled in favor of the homeless individuals.
The Court ruled in favor of Grants Pass.
The Court dismissed the case.
The Court ordered a retrial.
6.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
What was Justice Neil Gorsuch's reasoning in the majority opinion for the Grants Pass case?
The Eighth Amendment applies to all civil penalties.
The anti-camping laws were neutrally applied and not specific to homelessness.
The laws were discriminatory against minorities.
The federal government should intervene in local housing issues.
7.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
What was Justice Sonia Sotomayor's main argument in her dissenting opinion?
The law was necessary for public safety.
The law effectively criminalized homelessness.
The law was a state issue, not federal.
The law was neutral and fair.
Access all questions and much more by creating a free account
Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports

Continue with Google

Continue with Email

Continue with Microsoft
or continue with
%20(1).png)
Apple
Others
Already have an account?