Supreme Court Briefs: Martin v. Boise and Grants Pass v. Johnson

Supreme Court Briefs: Martin v. Boise and Grants Pass v. Johnson

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies

9th - 10th Grade

Hard

Created by

Jennifer Brown

FREE Resource

10 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main argument of the six homeless individuals in the Martin v. Boise case?

The law violated their right to privacy.

The law was discriminatory against minorities.

The law violated the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.

The law was not enforced equally across the city.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the outcome of the Martin v. Boise case in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals?

The court dismissed the case.

The court ruled in favor of the homeless individuals.

The court ordered a retrial.

The court ruled in favor of the city of Boise.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did the city of Grants Pass fail to provide, leading to a lawsuit?

Adequate public transportation

Decent homeless shelters

Affordable housing options

Job opportunities for the homeless

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main legal argument against Grants Pass in the U.S. District Court?

Violation of the Fourth Amendment

Violation of the Second Amendment

Violation of the Eighth Amendment and Due Process Clause

Violation of the First Amendment

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the Supreme Court's decision regarding the Grants Pass case?

The Court ruled in favor of the homeless individuals.

The Court ruled in favor of Grants Pass.

The Court dismissed the case.

The Court ordered a retrial.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was Justice Neil Gorsuch's reasoning in the majority opinion for the Grants Pass case?

The Eighth Amendment applies to all civil penalties.

The anti-camping laws were neutrally applied and not specific to homelessness.

The laws were discriminatory against minorities.

The federal government should intervene in local housing issues.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was Justice Sonia Sotomayor's main argument in her dissenting opinion?

The law was necessary for public safety.

The law effectively criminalized homelessness.

The law was a state issue, not federal.

The law was neutral and fair.

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?