Cl.5.1.3

How did the process of adopting the new Constitution differ significantly from amending the Articles of Confederation?

• The new Constitution required unanimous consent from all states, unlike the Articles.

• The new Constitution was written by a single author, while the Articles were a collaborative effort.

• The new Constitution bypassed the amendment process of the Articles, requiring ratification by a smaller number of states.

• The Articles of Confederation could be amended by a simple majority, but the Constitution required a supermajority.

What was a primary objective of the Federalists in advocating for the new Constitution?

• To establish a loose confederation of independent states.

• To strengthen the role of the federal government and create centralized authority.

• To eliminate all state governments and create a unitary system.

• To ensure that all power remained with the individual states.

Are you enjoying the video lesson?

• Yes

• No

What was a major concern expressed by the Anti-Federalists regarding the proposed Constitution?

• It would lead to an overly weak central government.

• It failed to adequately protect individual liberties and state interests.

• It would not allow for a standing army.

• It gave too much power to the judicial branch.

What was eventually added to the Constitution to address the concerns of the Anti-Federalists and secure its full ratification?

• A new presidential election system.

• The establishment of a national bank.

• The Bill of Rights.

• A clause allowing states to secede.