NEW
Font size
WorksheetsThinking, entrance test, ITMO 2019
Total questions: 8
Worksheet time: 16mins
Lewis's point of view on the issue that women wear rouge because that reminds men of ripe fruit is
positive
neutral
negative
first neutral, then negative
In move Lewis (4) the arguer tries to
reject the inference between the premise that rouge reminds men of more ripe fruit and the conclusion that women wear rouge
rebut the premise that rouge reminds men of more ripe fruit
disproof the conclusion that women wear rouge
reclaim that it is not stated well that women wear rouge because it reminds men of ripe fruit
What kind of trick is used in Peterson (6) starting from the words “Well people say women wear makeup...”?
No trick at all, it's just an example of unconvincing idea on the issue
Strawman
Appeal from popular opinion
Appeal from sign
First two lines of move Peterson (6) is an argument of
presumptive type
deductive type
inductive type
neither of these, it's not an argument at all
In Lewis (7) is used
an argument from correlation to cause
an argument from verbal classification
a deductive argument
an argument from bad consequences
In Peterson (1) the arguer
shifts the burden of proof
is signaling that he wants to know more about what the opponent thinks
is asking a critical question
trying to finish the discussion by irritating another party
Peterson (5) move lacks of the following type of relevancy
dialectical
emotional
probative
topical
Blue empty boxes in the middle each starts with LEWIS should be filled in as follows
“Not all ripe fruit is red” and “You do not want to eat women”
“I have absolutely no idea” and “Let's go back to why women wear rouge”
“And where is the evidence that women who are redder in cheeks have more offspring?” and “Do you want to eat women? No”
“I tell you why I wear makeup” and “Not all ripe fruit is red”
