Font size
WorksheetsCharter Quiz
Total questions: 80
Worksheet time: 2hrs 38mins
Which of the following freedoms or rights apply ONLY to CANADIAN citizens?
Mobility rights and legal rights
Mobility rights and democratic rights
Legal rights and equality rights
Freedom of speech and freedom of religion
Which right is being ignored if the police demand to come into your house without reason.
The be free from unreasonable search and seizure.
To be assumed innocent until proven guilty.
A public and quick trial
The right to run in an election
The CCRF guarantees that every citizen has rights.
All the time.
Under government control.
With reasonable limitations.
Only for adults over age 18.
If you are in trouble with the law which rights do you have?
You must be told what your crime is
You are guilty until proven innocent
You are innocent until proven guilty
You are allowed to have a lawyer
You must be tried (in court) in a timely manner
Mobility Rights mean
Canadians can move around Canada as they wish
Canadians can leave Canada and come back
Canadians can hop up and down
Canadians can dance the Hokey Pokey
Equality Rights mean you cannot be discriminated against because of
gender or age
race or religion
physical or mental ability
all of the above
none of the above
The Common Good benefits the majority of citizens.
True
False
How often must elections be held?
At least every ten years
At least every five years
At least once a year
Whenever they are needed
Which of the following is not a right from the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms?
The right to feel safe.
The right to share your opinion
The right to be assumed innocent until proven guilty.
The right to go to school in any language that you like.
The Lord's Day Act required stores to close on Sundays for religious reasons; however, stores remain open on Sundays. Which right might this violate?
Democratic Rights
Fundamental Freedoms
Equality Rights
Mobility Rights
Not a violation
In order to make any changes to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the federal government and at least seven provinces would have to agree to the change.
True
False
The Supreme Court of Canada found that Canada custom’s seizure of gay and lesbian materials did violate s. 2(b), freedom of expression, but that the violation was justified by s. 1. Because the existing definition of obscenity and the test used to interpret the definition was not discriminatory.
Sauvé v. Attorney General of Canada
United States v. Burns
Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v. Canada
This case sought to find a reasonable balance between sections 2(b) Freedom of Expression and 11(d) Right to a Fair Trial in order to ensure both sets of rights would be respected with regards to publication bans
R. v. Latimer
Dagenais v Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
R. v. Wigglesworth
Maintained the law criminalizing assisted suicide as constitutional.
Rodriguez v. British Columbia
R. v. Morgentaler
Vriend v. Alberta
The exclusion of sexual orientation as a ground of discrimination in the Individual's Rights Protection Act was found to be unconstitutional.
R. v. Latimer
R. v. Oakes
Vriend v. Alberta
Overturned abortion laws in Canada ruling that they were unconstitutional.
Rodriguez v. British Columbia
R. v. Morgentaler
R. v. Big M Drug Mart ltd.
The Supreme Court ruled that it was a breach of s. 7 to extradite a Canadian citizen facing criminal charges to the U.S. without getting assurances that the death penalty would not be imposed or carried out.
R. v. Stinchcombe
United States v. Burns
R. v. Ewanchuk
R. v. Oakes
This case argued that the minimum sentence of ten years for second-degree murder was cruel and unusual due to the claim that the murder of his daughter was out of necessity.
R. v. Stinchcombe
R. v. Morgentaler
R. v. Wigglesworth
R. v. Latimer
Upheld the right to be free from double jeopardy by differentiating between assault under the Criminal Code of Canada and assault as a Major Service Offence under the RCMP Act
R. v. Ewanchuk
R. v. Wigglesworth
R. v. Latimer
R. v. Oakes
Provided the Supreme Court with the opportunity to interpret the wording of section 1 "reasonable limits clause and to explain how section 1 would apply to a case every time a Charter violation is found.
Dagenais v Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v. Canada
R. v. Oakes
Sauvé v. Attorney General of Canada
Prison inmates that are Canadian citizens have been granted the right to vote while in prison
Sauvé v. Attorney General of Canada
United States v. Burns
Vriend v. Alberta
Rodriguez v. British Columbia
The Lord's Day Act was struck down, because they viewed it as a constitutional violation of Section 2 of The Charter
Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v. Canada
Dagenais v Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Vriend v. Alberta
R. v. Big M Drug Mart ltd.
This case decided that the Crown must disclose all relevant information to the accused prior to the trial so that the accused is able to make full defence to criminal charges.
R. v. Stinchcombe
R. v. Wigglesworth
R. v. Latimer
R. v. Keegstra
Who said the following in her Landmark case dealing with euthanasia: "If I do not own my body then whose body is this? Who owns my body?"
Rodriguez
Morgentaler
Vriend
Keegstra
Who would have said the following in his Landmark case dealing with abortion: “Every child a wanted child, every mother a willing mother."
Rodriguez
Morgentaler
Vriend
Keegstra
The Supreme Court of Canada found ‘implied consent’ is not a defence to sexual assault.
R. v. Ewanchuk
R. v. Marshall
R. v. Lavallee
R. v. Askov
In this aboriginal fishing rights case, the court emphasized the consideration of verbal negotiations for proving treaty rights. It was found that Treaty rights are aboriginal right must protected by s.35 of the Constitution, even if the treaty right is only verbal.
R. v. M.
R. v. Latimer
R. v. Askov
R. v. Marshall
Pleaded the self-defense known as Battered Woman Syndrome.
R v. Rogdriguez
R. v. Lavallee
R. v. Latimer
R. v. M.
Maintained that a person must be tried within a reasonable time. For people under 18, it is 6-9 months and 12 months for people 18+
R. v. Wigglesworth
R. v. Latimer
R. v. Askov
R. v. Marshall
This case set the precedent that in order to maintain a safe and orderly environment, teachers and other school officials must be able to act swiftly and effectively to combat dangers within the school system. As a result, the court found that the evidence gathered at the school dance was gathered fairly and should be admissible.
R. v. M.
R v Harrison
R. v. Children’s Aid Society of Met. Toronto
R. v. Mann
This precedent setting case ensures that a child's right to life is of greater importance than the parent’s religious beliefs in meeting the necessities of life.
R. v. Keegstra
R. v. Children’s Aid Society
R. v. Latimer
R. v. M.
A law which excluded agricultural workers from the right to a union and collective bargaining was deemed unconstitutional as it violated Freedom of Association.
R v. Orbanski
R. v. Mann
Adler v. Ontario
Dunmore v. Ontario
