ethos, pathos, logos

statements that support the claim

Response to a counterargument

appeal to credibility - using credible, trusted sources

Response to a counterargument

Support for the reasons offered; helps to convince audiences to accept claims.

appeal to credibility - using credible, trusted sources

appeal to logic and reason - using facts, statistics

Claim, Reasons, Evidence, Counterclaim, Rebuttal

statements that support the claim

Support for the reasons offered; helps to convince audiences to accept claims.

Opposite opinion of a claim.

A statement about what's true/good or about what should be done/believed; the writer's position on an issue.

statements that support the claim

Response to a counterargument

The opposite opinion of a claim

Claim, Reasons, Rhetorical Appeals, Purpose, Currency

Ethos, Pathos, Logos, Claim, Rhetorical Appeals

Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, Purpose

Claim, Reasons, Evidence, Counterclaim, Rebuttal

The methods used to persuade; ethos, pathos, and logos

How you tell if an author is credible or not

The opposite opinion of a claim

The response to a counterargument

Appeal to credibility - using trusted sources, expert opinions

Appeal to logic - using facts and statistics

Appeal to emotion - for example, using emotional stories or language

Appeal to logic - using facts/statistics

Appeal to emotion - using emotional stories or language for example

Appeal to credibility - using expert opinions, trusted sources

The opposite opinion of your claim

Appeal to logic - using facts or statistics

Appeal to emotion - using emotional stories or language for exampe

Appeal to credibility - using expert opinions, trusted sources

The opposite opinion of a claim

Checking a source for its: Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose

Checking a source for its: Casualness, Relevance, Arrogance, Ailment, and Potential

Checking a source for its: Carelessness, Regulation, Assonance, Arrogance, Purpose

Checking a source for its: Credibility, Rank, Answers, Ability, Potential

When an author favors one side and doesn't consider the evidence of the other side

When an author uses valid evidence to support his or her claims

When an author uses data as evidence

When an author is fair and objective

An appeal to credibility

An error in reasoning that undermines an argument

information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.

An appeal to logic

information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.

An error in reasoning that undermines an argument

A fallacy that introduces an irrelevant issue to divert attention from the subject under discussion

A fallacy that occurs when a speaker chooses a deliberately poor or oversimplified example in order to ridicule and refute an idea.

A fallacy that introduces an irrelevant issue to divert attention from the subject under discussion

A fallacy that occurs when a speaker chooses a deliberately poor or oversimplified example in order to ridicule and refute an idea.

Jumping to a conclusion based on one instance or example.

a fallacy that attacks the person rather than dealing with the real issue in dispute

A fallacy that introduces an irrelevant issue to divert attention from the subject under discussion

A fallacy that occurs when a speaker chooses a deliberately poor or oversimplified example in order to ridicule and refute an idea.

Jumping to a conclusion based on one instance or example.

a fallacy that attacks the person rather than dealing with the real issue in dispute

a fallacy that attacks the person rather than dealing with the real issue in dispute

Jumping to a conclusion based on one instance or example.

If A happens, then eventually B, C,..., X, Y, Z will happen, too. So, if we don't want Z to occur, A must not be allowed to occur either.

Assumes that if 'A' occurred after 'B' then 'B' must have caused 'A.'

Attacking the person rather than dealing with the real issue in dispute

If A happens, then eventually B, C,..., X, Y, Z will happen, too. So, if we don't want Z to occur, A must not be allowed to occur either.

Jumping to a conclusion based on one instance or example.

Assumes that if 'A' occurred after 'B' then 'B' must have caused 'A.'

Restates the argument (in a different way) rather than actually proving it.

Attacking the person rather than dealing with the real issue in dispute

Jumping to a conclusion based on one instance or example.

Appeal to logic or reasong

If A happens, then eventually B, C,..., X, Y, Z will happen, too. So, if we don't want Z to occur, A must not be allowed to occur either.

Appeal to emotion

Appeal to logic

Assumes that if 'A' occurred after 'B' then 'B' must have caused 'A.'

Attacking the person rather than dealing with the real issue in dispute

Appeal to emotion

If A happens, then eventually B, C,..., X, Y, Z will happen, too. So, if we don't want Z to occur, A must not be allowed to occur either.

Appeal to logic

playing on audience's deep-seated fears; making them think disaster will happen if they don't believe, do, or buy something

Appeal to logic

Appeal to credibility

Makes the appeal that "everyone else is doing it, and so should you."

Makes the appeal that "everyone else is doing it, and so should you."

playing on audience's deep-seated fears; making them think disaster will happen if they don't believe, do, or buy something

Appeal to logic and reason

Appeal to emotion