wayground logo

Free Printable Worksheets

Font size

S
M
L
XL
Worksheets

SPED Case Laws

Total questions: 10

Worksheet time: 10mins

Name
Class
Date
1.

Which law defined that separate is NOT equal

a)

PARC

b)

MILLS

c)

Brown v. BOE

d)

Daniel RR

2.

Which court case helped to develop the 2 prong test to see if the district's actions were in compliance with the IDEA?

a)

Brown v. BOE

b)

Daniel RR.

c)

P.L. 94-142

d)

PARC

3.

"To meet its substantive obligation under the IDEA, a school must offer an IEP that is reasonable calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child's circumstances." "Every child should have the chance to meet challenging objectives"

a)

Rowely v. BOE

b)

Larry P. v. Riles

c)

Timothy W. v Rochester, New Hampshire, School Districts

d)

Endrew F. v. Douglas County SD

4.

What principle from IDEA did the Timothy W. case re-enforce? "Can anyone be too special for SPED?"

a)

FAPE

b)

Parent Involvement

c)

Zero Reject

d)

LRE

5.

"Although the original ruling applies to the use of standardized IQ tests with African American children, many standardized speech and language tests also fall under the _______________ mandate because they directly or indirectly purport to measure IQ and their construct validity is partially or fully determined through correlations with other IQ tests." What case is this and what principle does it help define?

a)

LRE, Timothy

b)

Zero Reject, PARC

c)

FAPE, Mills

d)

Nondiscriminatory Evaluation, Larry P.

6.

Which case help set the foundation for Mills, but only applied to Pennsylvania?

a)

PARC

b)

Brown v. BOE

c)

Larry P.

d)

Timothy W.

7.

PARC impacted what 2 principles from IDEA?

a)

LRE & Zero Reject

b)

FAPE & LRE

c)

Non-discriminatory Evaluation & Parent Participation

d)

Procedural Due Process & Zero Reject

8.

Which case clearly outlined procedures of due process, mandated that all students receive a free and appropriate public education, and students with disabilities had the same right to education as their non-disabled peers through the 5 & 14th amendment?

a)

PARC

b)

Endrew

c)

Mills

d)

Larry P.

9.

Which ruling redefined FAPE to include peer interaction and the maximum social benefit possible?

a)

PARC v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

b)

Rowley v. BOE

c)

Brown v BOE

d)

Espino v. Besteiro

10.

This ruling provided children with disabilities access to public schools that also provided a basic floor of opportunity. Not the best education but one where the child has passing grades in classes and is advancing to higher grades.

a)

Espino v. Besteiro

b)

Brown v. BOE

c)

Rowley v. BOE

d)

Mills v. BOE of the District of Columbia