wayground logo

Free Printable Worksheets

Font size

S
M
L
XL
Worksheets

Religious language

Total questions: 10

Worksheet time: 6mins

Name
Class
Date
1.

Which scholars believed that religious language is cognitive? (expresses truth/falsity)

a)

Aquinas

b)

Randall

c)

Maimonides

d)

Tillich

2.

Which are types of analogy to describe God put forward by Aquinas?

a)

Analogy of metaphysics

b)

Analogy of proportion

c)

Analogy of attribution

d)

Analogy of metaphors

3.

Which are examples of via positiva (cataphatic approach)?

a)

Analogy

b)

Verification

c)

Symbol

d)

The apophatic way

4.

Why does Hume reject the use of analogy to talk about God?

a)

God is beyond words and description

b)

There is undeniable proof that God does not exist

c)

The difference between God and the world is too vast

d)

We would be guilty of anthropomorphism

5.

According to Aquinas analogy sits between ...

a)

Masculine and feminine language

b)

The apophatic and the cataphatic

c)

Univocal and equivocal language

d)

Positive and negative language

6.

Who else put forward ideas about analogy including the qualified model and disclosure situation?

a)

Aristotle

b)

Paul Tillich

c)

Ian Ramsey

d)

A.J. Ayer

7.

Who argued that analogy gives the appearance of saying something about God but is in reality no clearer than via negativa?

a)

Vincent Brummer

b)

David Hume

c)

Paul Tillich

d)

Richard Swinburne

8.

Who compared the faithfulness of dogs and humans to demonstrate the analogy of proportion?

a)

Richard Swinburne

b)

Frederick Ferre

c)

John Hick

d)

Richard Dawkins

9.

Which are benefits of speaking analogically about God?

a)

It is similar to how Jesus taught (through parables)

b)

It prevents us from anthropomorphising God

c)

It helps us to use language rather than avoid it altogether

d)

Analogies are always understood in the same way by all people

10.

Which are problems with speaking analogically about God?

a)

Analogies may mean different things to different people

b)

We might just be making assumptions about God

c)

It does not avoid the problems with univocal and equivocal language

d)

It is not accessible to ordinary people who are not expert theologians