NEW
Font size
WorksheetsThe Cobra Effect
Total questions: 10
Worksheet time: 20mins
The Cobra Effect
The British colonized India from 1858 to 1947. That means that they ruled the country. They
governed the Indian people. They used India to make wealth for the British Empire. But they
also developed India. They built canals and railroads. They tried to make India more like the
United Kingdom.
Yet India was different from the UK. It was more rustic. The ecology was different too. Some
British colonists had a hard time adapting. The snakes were particularly troubling. The capital
area of Delhi was overrun with venomous cobras.
Encountering a cobra is quite frightening. It's even worse getting bit by one. The cobras killed
many colonists. Enough died that the British government took action. They paid a bounty for
every dead cobra.
The program was a success at first. Many people hunted and killed the cobras for the
rewards. The number of cobras dropped. The colonists felt safer. But then it became harder to
catch cobras. So enterprising people started breeding them. After all, it is easier to catch a pet
cobra than a wild one.
News of this scheme got back to the British government. They learned that people were
breeding cobras to earn rewards. This is not what the British wanted to happen. They felt
foolish. They scrapped the program.
Now the breeders were angry. Raising cobras can be challenging. They were doing it for the
money. When the program ended, the snakes were worthless. So the breeders released them
into the wild. Now there were more wild cobras than when the program started.
The British plan seemed like a good idea at first. In practice though, it made things much
worse. This is the cobra effect. The cobra effect is when a solution worsens a problem.
Many well-intentioned programs backfire. In 2014 the City of Chicago banned lightweight
plastic bags. Single use bags are bad for the environment. They end up in the water. They
pollute the land. City officials wanted people to reuse bags. So they put a tax on lightweight
bags.
Retailers did not want to anger customers with the new tax. So they made their bags much
thicker. The new bags were 150 times thicker than the old bags. The thicker bags were no
longer lightweight, so they weren't taxed. But most customers did not reuse these bags. They
just threw away the really thick plastic bags.
This is another example of the cobra effect. The city intended to reduce plastic waste, yet
the tax worsened it 150 fold. Our actions do not always have the consequences that we expect.
Which best defines the word 'colonize' as used in the FIRST paragraph?
a) To do battle or fight with another group of people
b) To trade or do business with other people
c) To inhabit and rule a foreign land
d) To destroy or ruin a foreign land
The Cobra Effect
The British colonized India from 1858 to 1947. That means that they ruled the country. They
governed the Indian people. They used India to make wealth for the British Empire. But they
also developed India. They built canals and railroads. They tried to make India more like the
United Kingdom.
Yet India was different from the UK. It was more rustic. The ecology was different too. Some
British colonists had a hard time adapting. The snakes were particularly troubling. The capital
area of Delhi was overrun with venomous cobras.
Encountering a cobra is quite frightening. It's even worse getting bit by one. The cobras killed
many colonists. Enough died that the British government took action. They paid a bounty for
every dead cobra.
The program was a success at first. Many people hunted and killed the cobras for the
rewards. The number of cobras dropped. The colonists felt safer. But then it became harder to
catch cobras. So enterprising people started breeding them. After all, it is easier to catch a pet
cobra than a wild one.
News of this scheme got back to the British government. They learned that people were
breeding cobras to earn rewards. This is not what the British wanted to happen. They felt
foolish. They scrapped the program.
Now the breeders were angry. Raising cobras can be challenging. They were doing it for the
money. When the program ended, the snakes were worthless. So the breeders released them
into the wild. Now there were more wild cobras than when the program started.
The British plan seemed like a good idea at first. In practice though, it made things much
worse. This is the cobra effect. The cobra effect is when a solution worsens a problem.
Many well-intentioned programs backfire. In 2014 the City of Chicago banned lightweight
plastic bags. Single use bags are bad for the environment. They end up in the water. They
pollute the land. City officials wanted people to reuse bags. So they put a tax on lightweight
bags.
Retailers did not want to anger customers with the new tax. So they made their bags much
thicker. The new bags were 150 times thicker than the old bags. The thicker bags were no
longer lightweight, so they weren't taxed. But most customers did not reuse these bags. They
just threw away the really thick plastic bags.
This is another example of the cobra effect. The city intended to reduce plastic waste, yet
the tax worsened it 150 fold. Our actions do not always have the consequences that we expect.
2) Which conclusion can be supported with text from the passage?
a) India had the same amount of poisonous snakes as the UK.
b) India DID NOT have poisonous snakes.
c) India had more poisonous snakes than the UK.
d) India had fewer poisonous snakes than the UK
The Cobra Effect
The British colonized India from 1858 to 1947. That means that they ruled the country. They
governed the Indian people. They used India to make wealth for the British Empire. But they
also developed India. They built canals and railroads. They tried to make India more like the
United Kingdom.
Yet India was different from the UK. It was more rustic. The ecology was different too. Some
British colonists had a hard time adapting. The snakes were particularly troubling. The capital
area of Delhi was overrun with venomous cobras.
Encountering a cobra is quite frightening. It's even worse getting bit by one. The cobras killed
many colonists. Enough died that the British government took action. They paid a bounty for
every dead cobra.
The program was a success at first. Many people hunted and killed the cobras for the
rewards. The number of cobras dropped. The colonists felt safer. But then it became harder to
catch cobras. So enterprising people started breeding them. After all, it is easier to catch a pet
cobra than a wild one.
News of this scheme got back to the British government. They learned that people were
breeding cobras to earn rewards. This is not what the British wanted to happen. They felt
foolish. They scrapped the program.
Now the breeders were angry. Raising cobras can be challenging. They were doing it for the
money. When the program ended, the snakes were worthless. So the breeders released them
into the wild. Now there were more wild cobras than when the program started.
The British plan seemed like a good idea at first. In practice though, it made things much
worse. This is the cobra effect. The cobra effect is when a solution worsens a problem.
Many well-intentioned programs backfire. In 2014 the City of Chicago banned lightweight
plastic bags. Single use bags are bad for the environment. They end up in the water. They
pollute the land. City officials wanted people to reuse bags. So they put a tax on lightweight
bags.
Retailers did not want to anger customers with the new tax. So they made their bags much
thicker. The new bags were 150 times thicker than the old bags. The thicker bags were no
longer lightweight, so they weren't taxed. But most customers did not reuse these bags. They
just threw away the really thick plastic bags.
This is another example of the cobra effect. The city intended to reduce plastic waste, yet
the tax worsened it 150 fold. Our actions do not always have the consequences that we expect.
3) Which event happened LAST?
a) The snake breeders released their cobras into the wild.
b) The government began paying a bounty for dead snakes.
c) The number of snakes decreased.
d) People started breeding snakes.
The Cobra Effect
The British colonized India from 1858 to 1947. That means that they ruled the country. They
governed the Indian people. They used India to make wealth for the British Empire. But they
also developed India. They built canals and railroads. They tried to make India more like the
United Kingdom.
Yet India was different from the UK. It was more rustic. The ecology was different too. Some
British colonists had a hard time adapting. The snakes were particularly troubling. The capital
area of Delhi was overrun with venomous cobras.
Encountering a cobra is quite frightening. It's even worse getting bit by one. The cobras killed
many colonists. Enough died that the British government took action. They paid a bounty for
every dead cobra.
The program was a success at first. Many people hunted and killed the cobras for the
rewards. The number of cobras dropped. The colonists felt safer. But then it became harder to
catch cobras. So enterprising people started breeding them. After all, it is easier to catch a pet
cobra than a wild one.
News of this scheme got back to the British government. They learned that people were
breeding cobras to earn rewards. This is not what the British wanted to happen. They felt
foolish. They scrapped the program.
Now the breeders were angry. Raising cobras can be challenging. They were doing it for the
money. When the program ended, the snakes were worthless. So the breeders released them
into the wild. Now there were more wild cobras than when the program started.
The British plan seemed like a good idea at first. In practice though, it made things much
worse. This is the cobra effect. The cobra effect is when a solution worsens a problem.
Many well-intentioned programs backfire. In 2014 the City of Chicago banned lightweight
plastic bags. Single use bags are bad for the environment. They end up in the water. They
pollute the land. City officials wanted people to reuse bags. So they put a tax on lightweight
bags.
Retailers did not want to anger customers with the new tax. So they made their bags much
thicker. The new bags were 150 times thicker than the old bags. The thicker bags were no
longer lightweight, so they weren't taxed. But most customers did not reuse these bags. They
just threw away the really thick plastic bags.
This is another example of the cobra effect. The city intended to reduce plastic waste, yet
the tax worsened it 150 fold. Our actions do not always have the consequences that we expect.
4) What was the overall effect of the bounty program on the cobra population in Delhi?
a) The number of snakes decreased.
b) The number of snakes stayed about the same.
c) The snakes were completely wiped out.
d) The number of snakes increased.
The Cobra Effect
The British colonized India from 1858 to 1947. That means that they ruled the country. They
governed the Indian people. They used India to make wealth for the British Empire. But they
also developed India. They built canals and railroads. They tried to make India more like the
United Kingdom.
Yet India was different from the UK. It was more rustic. The ecology was different too. Some
British colonists had a hard time adapting. The snakes were particularly troubling. The capital
area of Delhi was overrun with venomous cobras.
Encountering a cobra is quite frightening. It's even worse getting bit by one. The cobras killed
many colonists. Enough died that the British government took action. They paid a bounty for
every dead cobra.
The program was a success at first. Many people hunted and killed the cobras for the
rewards. The number of cobras dropped. The colonists felt safer. But then it became harder to
catch cobras. So enterprising people started breeding them. After all, it is easier to catch a pet
cobra than a wild one.
News of this scheme got back to the British government. They learned that people were
breeding cobras to earn rewards. This is not what the British wanted to happen. They felt
foolish. They scrapped the program.
Now the breeders were angry. Raising cobras can be challenging. They were doing it for the
money. When the program ended, the snakes were worthless. So the breeders released them
into the wild. Now there were more wild cobras than when the program started.
The British plan seemed like a good idea at first. In practice though, it made things much
worse. This is the cobra effect. The cobra effect is when a solution worsens a problem.
Many well-intentioned programs backfire. In 2014 the City of Chicago banned lightweight
plastic bags. Single use bags are bad for the environment. They end up in the water. They
pollute the land. City officials wanted people to reuse bags. So they put a tax on lightweight
bags.
Retailers did not want to anger customers with the new tax. So they made their bags much
thicker. The new bags were 150 times thicker than the old bags. The thicker bags were no
longer lightweight, so they weren't taxed. But most customers did not reuse these bags. They
just threw away the really thick plastic bags.
This is another example of the cobra effect. The city intended to reduce plastic waste, yet
the tax worsened it 150 fold. Our actions do not always have the consequences that we expect.
5) Which best defines the term 'cobra effect' as described in the text?
a) A response to a problem that has no effect.
b) A response to a problem that completely solves it.
c) A response to a problem that makes it worse.
d) A response to a problem that makes it better
The Cobra Effect
The British colonized India from 1858 to 1947. That means that they ruled the country. They
governed the Indian people. They used India to make wealth for the British Empire. But they
also developed India. They built canals and railroads. They tried to make India more like the
United Kingdom.
Yet India was different from the UK. It was more rustic. The ecology was different too. Some
British colonists had a hard time adapting. The snakes were particularly troubling. The capital
area of Delhi was overrun with venomous cobras.
Encountering a cobra is quite frightening. It's even worse getting bit by one. The cobras killed
many colonists. Enough died that the British government took action. They paid a bounty for
every dead cobra.
The program was a success at first. Many people hunted and killed the cobras for the
rewards. The number of cobras dropped. The colonists felt safer. But then it became harder to
catch cobras. So enterprising people started breeding them. After all, it is easier to catch a pet
cobra than a wild one.
News of this scheme got back to the British government. They learned that people were
breeding cobras to earn rewards. This is not what the British wanted to happen. They felt
foolish. They scrapped the program.
Now the breeders were angry. Raising cobras can be challenging. They were doing it for the
money. When the program ended, the snakes were worthless. So the breeders released them
into the wild. Now there were more wild cobras than when the program started.
The British plan seemed like a good idea at first. In practice though, it made things much
worse. This is the cobra effect. The cobra effect is when a solution worsens a problem.
Many well-intentioned programs backfire. In 2014 the City of Chicago banned lightweight
plastic bags. Single use bags are bad for the environment. They end up in the water. They
pollute the land. City officials wanted people to reuse bags. So they put a tax on lightweight
bags.
Retailers did not want to anger customers with the new tax. So they made their bags much
thicker. The new bags were 150 times thicker than the old bags. The thicker bags were no
longer lightweight, so they weren't taxed. But most customers did not reuse these bags. They
just threw away the really thick plastic bags.
This is another example of the cobra effect. The city intended to reduce plastic waste, yet
the tax worsened it 150 fold. Our actions do not always have the consequences that we expect
6) Which is NOT a reason why the City of Chicago put a tax on plastic bags?
a) Lightweight plastic bags are toxic to children.
b) The city wanted people to reuse bags.
c) Lightweight plastic bags pollute the water.
d) Lightweight plastic bags pollute the land.
The Cobra Effect
The British colonized India from 1858 to 1947. That means that they ruled the country. They
governed the Indian people. They used India to make wealth for the British Empire. But they
also developed India. They built canals and railroads. They tried to make India more like the
United Kingdom.
Yet India was different from the UK. It was more rustic. The ecology was different too. Some
British colonists had a hard time adapting. The snakes were particularly troubling. The capital
area of Delhi was overrun with venomous cobras.
Encountering a cobra is quite frightening. It's even worse getting bit by one. The cobras killed
many colonists. Enough died that the British government took action. They paid a bounty for
every dead cobra.
The program was a success at first. Many people hunted and killed the cobras for the
rewards. The number of cobras dropped. The colonists felt safer. But then it became harder to
catch cobras. So enterprising people started breeding them. After all, it is easier to catch a pet
cobra than a wild one.
News of this scheme got back to the British government. They learned that people were
breeding cobras to earn rewards. This is not what the British wanted to happen. They felt
foolish. They scrapped the program.
Now the breeders were angry. Raising cobras can be challenging. They were doing it for the
money. When the program ended, the snakes were worthless. So the breeders released them
into the wild. Now there were more wild cobras than when the program started.
The British plan seemed like a good idea at first. In practice though, it made things much
worse. This is the cobra effect. The cobra effect is when a solution worsens a problem.
Many well-intentioned programs backfire. In 2014 the City of Chicago banned lightweight
plastic bags. Single use bags are bad for the environment. They end up in the water. They
pollute the land. City officials wanted people to reuse bags. So they put a tax on lightweight
bags.
Retailers did not want to anger customers with the new tax. So they made their bags much
thicker. The new bags were 150 times thicker than the old bags. The thicker bags were no
longer lightweight, so they weren't taxed. But most customers did not reuse these bags. They
just threw away the really thick plastic bags.
This is another example of the cobra effect. The city intended to reduce plastic waste, yet
the tax worsened it 150 fold. Our actions do not always have the consequences that we expect.
7) How did retailers respond to the tax on lightweight plastic bags?
a) They gave paper bags to customers.
b) They gave thick plastic bags to customers.
c) They stopped giving bags to customers.
d) They passed the tax on to the customers.
The Cobra Effect
The British colonized India from 1858 to 1947. That means that they ruled the country. They
governed the Indian people. They used India to make wealth for the British Empire. But they
also developed India. They built canals and railroads. They tried to make India more like the
United Kingdom.
Yet India was different from the UK. It was more rustic. The ecology was different too. Some
British colonists had a hard time adapting. The snakes were particularly troubling. The capital
area of Delhi was overrun with venomous cobras.
Encountering a cobra is quite frightening. It's even worse getting bit by one. The cobras killed
many colonists. Enough died that the British government took action. They paid a bounty for
every dead cobra.
The program was a success at first. Many people hunted and killed the cobras for the
rewards. The number of cobras dropped. The colonists felt safer. But then it became harder to
catch cobras. So enterprising people started breeding them. After all, it is easier to catch a pet
cobra than a wild one.
News of this scheme got back to the British government. They learned that people were
breeding cobras to earn rewards. This is not what the British wanted to happen. They felt
foolish. They scrapped the program.
Now the breeders were angry. Raising cobras can be challenging. They were doing it for the
money. When the program ended, the snakes were worthless. So the breeders released them
into the wild. Now there were more wild cobras than when the program started.
The British plan seemed like a good idea at first. In practice though, it made things much
worse. This is the cobra effect. The cobra effect is when a solution worsens a problem.
Many well-intentioned programs backfire. In 2014 the City of Chicago banned lightweight
plastic bags. Single use bags are bad for the environment. They end up in the water. They
pollute the land. City officials wanted people to reuse bags. So they put a tax on lightweight
bags.
Retailers did not want to anger customers with the new tax. So they made their bags much
thicker. The new bags were 150 times thicker than the old bags. The thicker bags were no
longer lightweight, so they weren't taxed. But most customers did not reuse these bags. They
just threw away the really thick plastic bags.
This is another example of the cobra effect. The city intended to reduce plastic waste, yet
the tax worsened it 150 fold. Our actions do not always have the consequences that we expect.
8) How did the tax affect the problem with plastic bags in the City of Chicago?
a) It helped reduce the problem a little bit.
b) It solved the problem completely.
c) It made the problem worse.
d) It helped reduce the problem a lot.
The Cobra Effect
The British colonized India from 1858 to 1947. That means that they ruled the country. They
governed the Indian people. They used India to make wealth for the British Empire. But they
also developed India. They built canals and railroads. They tried to make India more like the
United Kingdom.
Yet India was different from the UK. It was more rustic. The ecology was different too. Some
British colonists had a hard time adapting. The snakes were particularly troubling. The capital
area of Delhi was overrun with venomous cobras.
Encountering a cobra is quite frightening. It's even worse getting bit by one. The cobras killed
many colonists. Enough died that the British government took action. They paid a bounty for
every dead cobra.
The program was a success at first. Many people hunted and killed the cobras for the
rewards. The number of cobras dropped. The colonists felt safer. But then it became harder to
catch cobras. So enterprising people started breeding them. After all, it is easier to catch a pet
cobra than a wild one.
News of this scheme got back to the British government. They learned that people were
breeding cobras to earn rewards. This is not what the British wanted to happen. They felt
foolish. They scrapped the program.
Now the breeders were angry. Raising cobras can be challenging. They were doing it for the
money. When the program ended, the snakes were worthless. So the breeders released them
into the wild. Now there were more wild cobras than when the program started.
The British plan seemed like a good idea at first. In practice though, it made things much
worse. This is the cobra effect. The cobra effect is when a solution worsens a problem.
Many well-intentioned programs backfire. In 2014 the City of Chicago banned lightweight
plastic bags. Single use bags are bad for the environment. They end up in the water. They
pollute the land. City officials wanted people to reuse bags. So they put a tax on lightweight
bags.
Retailers did not want to anger customers with the new tax. So they made their bags much
thicker. The new bags were 150 times thicker than the old bags. The thicker bags were no
longer lightweight, so they weren't taxed. But most customers did not reuse these bags. They
just threw away the really thick plastic bags.
This is another example of the cobra effect. The city intended to reduce plastic waste, yet
the tax worsened it 150 fold. Our actions do not always have the consequences that we expect.
9) With which statement would the author most likely AGREE?
a) There is no such thing as a bad idea.
b) Think through solutions carefully before trying them.
c) The fastest solution to a problem is always the best solution.
d) There's no point in trying to fix anything.
The Cobra Effect
The British colonized India from 1858 to 1947. That means that they ruled the country. They
governed the Indian people. They used India to make wealth for the British Empire. But they
also developed India. They built canals and railroads. They tried to make India more like the
United Kingdom.
Yet India was different from the UK. It was more rustic. The ecology was different too. Some
British colonists had a hard time adapting. The snakes were particularly troubling. The capital
area of Delhi was overrun with venomous cobras.
Encountering a cobra is quite frightening. It's even worse getting bit by one. The cobras killed
many colonists. Enough died that the British government took action. They paid a bounty for
every dead cobra.
The program was a success at first. Many people hunted and killed the cobras for the
rewards. The number of cobras dropped. The colonists felt safer. But then it became harder to
catch cobras. So enterprising people started breeding them. After all, it is easier to catch a pet
cobra than a wild one.
News of this scheme got back to the British government. They learned that people were
breeding cobras to earn rewards. This is not what the British wanted to happen. They felt
foolish. They scrapped the program.
Now the breeders were angry. Raising cobras can be challenging. They were doing it for the
money. When the program ended, the snakes were worthless. So the breeders released them
into the wild. Now there were more wild cobras than when the program started.
The British plan seemed like a good idea at first. In practice though, it made things much
worse. This is the cobra effect. The cobra effect is when a solution worsens a problem.
Many well-intentioned programs backfire. In 2014 the City of Chicago banned lightweight
plastic bags. Single use bags are bad for the environment. They end up in the water. They
pollute the land. City officials wanted people to reuse bags. So they put a tax on lightweight
bags.
Retailers did not want to anger customers with the new tax. So they made their bags much
thicker. The new bags were 150 times thicker than the old bags. The thicker bags were no
longer lightweight, so they weren't taxed. But most customers did not reuse these bags. They
just threw away the really thick plastic bags.
This is another example of the cobra effect. The city intended to reduce plastic waste, yet
the tax worsened it 150 fold. Our actions do not always have the consequences that we expect.
10) What lesson can readers learn from this text?
a) Our actions can have unexpected consequences.
b) Things will always work out in the end.
c) Outcomes don't matter as long as you try your best.
d) Intentions are more important than consequences.
