What do call a form of personal justification which changes from person to person based on their own ethical and moral code, as well as experience.

Who described reason and feeling(emotions) as two horses pulling a chariot, with the charioteer struggling to make them work as a team.

What do you call the feeling of not having too much emotion. Feeling of indifference.

What do call the expression that "moves us to partake of the pleasure or pain, the happiness or misery, of others.” (Davis, 1900,p. 274). Example if someone has lost a loved one or when we are invited to our friends celebration like wedding etc

What is it called when we are concerned for the welfare of others, particularly in situations where others are suffering. Like putting our feet in their shoes.

What is the theory about sentences, words, and speech acts; it is sometimes also extended to cover aesthetic and other nonmoral forms of evaluation. The use of flowery words to manipulate and control their listeners.

What do you call the theory that can be described to individuals acting upon their ethical values to help others during difficult ethical dilemmas, despite the adversity they may face in doing so.

They can be sometimes unreliable because they are partial.

Personal justification.

Put us on a state where we reflect our own biases or avoid being reflected or called as bias.

When followed to rigidly sometimes may lead us to treat others as cold and inhumane. it is right but not kind.

This prompts us to show or spread love and compassion towards people, animals and our environment.

This allows us to notice our inadequacies.

Case 1

An I.T expert working on a big tech firm discovered that his company has connections with terrorists and found out they are set to detonate a bomb on a major city. If it happens casualties are to be expected. The I.T expert knows how stop it by hacking the system, but is in an ethical dilemma because it is against company policy to interfere company operations. After careful thought and realizing time is running the I.T expert decides to hack the system and programmed it to self destruct. Doing such action what do you think prompted him to do so?

Case 1: Question: What ethical dilemma is/are presented on this scenario?

Case 2:

A cop saw an on going burglary on a closed food shop. When he went to invistigate he saw a woman stealing food from the pantry. The woman is familiar to you. She has kids and they are homeless. The woman tried to ran away the cop chased and caught her. The cop did the unexpected instead, he went into a nearby grocery shop and bought her food, drinks enough for her family for the next few weeks.

The woman is emotional and cannot believe it.

What influenced the cop to do it?

Case 2: Question: Will the cop be questioned by his superior/s for he did?

Case 2: Question: If the cop always choose to let go of people stealing do you think it will have impact on the society in the long run?

Case 3: Hospital Setting: A 14-year old girl was rushed to the hospital after an accident and needs immediate blood transfusion or else she will die. However, the family did not consent it. The patient is unconscious. Despite doctors persuading them they are still adamant about it because of their religious beliefs. They will just let God decide if their daughter lives or die. Question: If you are one of the doctors, knowing that there is still something to be done. What would be your approach/reaction towards the family?

Case 3: Hospital setting: Without knowledge of medical ethics. For you where should be the attention on that scenario?

Case 3: Hospital setting: Because of feelings it compelled the doctors on that scenario to conspire and stealthily transfused blood without the parents knowledge. What could be the possible consequence/s of their actions?