wayground logo

Free Printable Worksheets

NEW

Font size

S
M
L
XL
Worksheets

12 angry men Act 1

Total questions: 10

Worksheet time: 20mins

Name
Class
Date
1.

What is the boy in the case charged with?

a)

Murdering his old man neighbor

b)

Assault with a Deadly weapon

c)

Murder of his father

d)

Raping his neighbor

2.

What happens to the boy if he is found guilty?

a)

He is put to death

b)

He must spend 20 years in jail

c)

He has to go to the Supreme Court

d)

He goes to prison for his entire life

3.

FOUR. We're missing the point here. This boy- let's say he's a product of a filthy neighborhood and a broken home. We can't help that. We're not here to go into the reasons why slums are breeding grounds for criminals; they are. I know it. So do you. The children who come out of slum backgrounds are potential menaces to society.

What can we infer about juror #4

a)

He wants to help poor children in the slums

b)

He is tired of being in court and he wants to go home

c)

He believes that children's bad behavior are their parents fault

d)

He has a bias against poor people

4.

FOUR. We're missing the point here. This boy- let's say he's a product of a filthy neighborhood and a broken home. We can't help that. We're not here to go into the reasons why slums are breeding grounds for criminals; they are. I know it. So do you. The children who come out of slum backgrounds are potential menaces to society.

This is an example of what logical fallacy?

a)

Slippery Slope

b)

Ad Hominem

c)

Stereotype

d)

Red Herring

5.

Which juror says the defendant is not-guilty

a)

three

b)

four

c)

five

d)

eight

6.

The defendant claimed he was at the movies during the time of the murder. What is the problem with his alibi?

a)

He couldn't remember what movie he saw

b)

There were no movies playing during that time

c)

He didn't have money to go to the movie

d)

The movie ended early enough for him to still kill his father

7.

Juror eight was able to find a knife that looked like the knife used in the murder. What can we infer about this discovery?

a)

The knife is not capable of killing a man

b)

The knife is unique and only the boy had access to the weapon

c)

The knife used in the murder isn't so special, and the boy might be innocent

d)

The knife wasn't used to kill the man

8.

THREE. Okay, let's get to the facts. Number one: let's take the old man who lived on the second floor right underneath the room where the murder took place. At ten minutes after twelve on the night of the killing he heard loud noises in the upstairs apartment. He said it sounded like a fight. Then he heard the kid say to his father, ''I'm gonna kill you."

This is an example of what type of appeal?

a)

pathos

b)

ad hominem

c)

ethos

d)

logos

9.

THREE: You're right. It's the kids. The way they are-you know? They don't listen.

What type of conflict is shown here.

a)

man v. society

b)

man v. self

c)

man v. man

d)

man v. nature

10.

FOUR [to THREE]. I agree with you that the boy is guilty but I think we should try to avoid emotionally colored arguments.

What appeal would work best for juror number 4?

a)

pathos

b)

logos

c)

ethos

d)

altruistic