Which case involved a student's campaign speech?

Which case determined that a student's First Amendment rights were not protected speech because it was not a passive or political statement? Instead it was inappropriate speech that interfered with the school’s educational environment and civility.

Which case involves students holding a banner at a school event that made reference to drug activity?

Which case said that schools can prohibit speech that is destructive to the health and welfare of youth? The case also said that a school may restrict speech that advocates illegal drug use because a school has “a compelling interest in preventing the severe and permanent damage to the health and well-being of young people.” However, schools cannot restrict political speech, including political debates about drug policy?

Which case involved a school newspaper that had articles on teen pregnancy and divorce deleted?

Which case determined that a student's First Amendment rights were NOT violated and that educators can exercise editorial control over the style AND content of student speech in school-sponsored expressive activities IF their actions are reasonably related to legitimate teaching/educational concerns?

Established that a student does not shed his or her rights at the "schoolhouse gate."

This case decided that principals have the right to edit school newspapers as long as he or she has a pedagogical concern for the students.