WorksheetsEnglish 10 Art of Argument Practice Quiz
Total questions: 16
Worksheet time: 8mins
Fallacy
a technique that people use to persuade others to think or do something
a type of non-argumentative persuasion
a commonly recognized type of bad argument
The two imaginary characters in the "Dialogue on Logic and Propaganda"
Tiffany and Napoleon
Aristotle and Tiffany
Plato and Tiffany
Tiffany and Socrates
Ad fontem fallacy
a fallacy that uses personal attack, including abusive or derogatory terms (insults, put downs, etc.), attempting to “win” an argument by avoiding the issues and making the opponent look bad
an attempt to persuade by making people afraid of what will happen if they don’t agree to the ideas of the argument
a bad argument that focuses on the source of the argument instead of the actual issue
Tu quoque fallacy
an attempt to persuade by making others feel sorry for the person making the argument or for the people being described in the argument
a fallacy that avoids the issues by claiming that there is no need to take someone’s argument seriously because he or she doesn’t live by it
a type of fallacy that attacks a source that is a group or institution rather than an individual
Red herrings
fallacies that are particularly obvious and identifiable attempts to persuade people through emotions rather than reasoning
fallacies that don’t necessarily play on human emotion, but nevertheless direct attention to something that is not relevant
bad arguments that focus on the source of the argument instead of the actual issue
Ad hominem abusive fallacy
a fallacy that uses personal attack, (insults, put downs, etc.), attempting to “win” an argument by avoiding the issues and making the opponent look bad
a type of fallacy that attacks a source that is a group or institution rather than an individual
a fallacy that avoids the issues by claiming that there is no need to take someone’s argument seriously because he or she doesn’t live by it
Propaganda
the requirement that the parts of an argument offer objective support for the argument itself; the premises must “bear upon” the conclusion
a commonly recognized type of bad argument
any sort of technique that people use to get groups of people to do or believe something that they might not otherwise do or believe (especially techniques that bypass reasoning and are tricky or dishonest)
Appeal to pity
a fallacy that avoids the issues by claiming that there is no need to take someone’s argument seriously because of something specific about their circumstances (self-interest, for example)
an attempt to persuade by appealing to the emotions of a crowd or mob of people – instigating herd behavior intentionally, for purposes of power and control
an attempt to persuade by making others feel sorry for the person making the argument or for the people being described in the argument
Appeal to emotion
a fallacy that is an obvious and identifiable attempt to persuade people through emotions rather than reasoning
an attempt to persuade by making people afraid of what will happen if they don’t agree to the ideas of the argument
a commonly recognized type of bad argument
Ad hominem circumstantial
a fallacy that avoids the issues by claiming that there is no need to take someone’s argument seriously because he or she doesn’t live by it
an attempt to persuade by appealing to a sense of elitism, “discriminating taste,” in-group status, etc.
a fallacy that avoids the issues by claiming that there is no need to take someone’s argument seriously because of something specific about their circumstances (self-interest, for example)
Straw man
an attempt to discredit someone’s beliefs or position by misrepresenting the beliefs/position (putting them in an inaccurate way)
a fallacy that uses personal attack, including abusive or derogatory terms (insults, put downs, etc.), attempting to “win” an argument by avoiding the issues and making the opponent look bad
an attempt to persuade by making others feel sorry for the person making the argument or for the people being described in the argument
Snob appeal
an attempt to persuade by appealing to a sense of elitism, “discriminating taste,” in-group status, etc.
an attempt to discredit someone’s beliefs or position by misrepresenting the beliefs/position (putting them in an inaccurate way)
an attempt to persuade by making others feel sorry for the person making the argument or for the people being described in the argument
Appeal to fear
an attempt to persuade by making others feel sorry for the person making the argument or for the people being described in the argument
an attempt to persuade by making people afraid of what will happen if they don’t agree to the ideas of the argument
a type of fallacy that attacks a source that is a group or institution rather than an individual
Genetic fallacy
a type of fallacy that attacks a source that is a group or institution rather than an individual
a fallacy that avoids the issues by claiming that there is no need to take someone’s argument seriously because he or she doesn’t live by it
a fallacy that avoids the issues by claiming that there is no need to take someone’s argument seriously because of something specific about their circumstances (self-interest, for example)
Mob appeal
an attempt to persuade by appealing to a sense of elitism, “discriminating taste,” in-group status, etc.
an attempt to persuade by appealing to the emotions of a crowd or mob of people – instigating herd behavior intentionally, for purposes of power and control
an attempt to persuade by making people afraid of what will happen if they don’t agree to the ideas of the argument
Principle of relevance
an attempt to discredit someone’s beliefs or position by misrepresenting the beliefs/position (putting them in an inaccurate way)
any sort of technique that people use to get other people to do or believe something that they might not otherwise do or believe, in particular techniques that bypass reasoning and have an element of dishonesty or trickery
the requirement that the parts of an argument offer objective support for the argument itself; the premises must “bear upon” the conclusion
