Font size
WorksheetsBiology, Cognitive, Learning, and Social Approaches
Total questions: 133
Worksheet time: 2hrs 46mins
What approach was the Dement and Kleitman Study?
Biological
Learning
Cognitive
Social
Dement and Kleitman: Pick ONE strength and ONE Weakness
Strength: Was a laboratory experiment (Had high control over extraneous variables)
Weakness: Did not contain deception which is an ethical issue
Weakness: Used deception which is an ethical issue
Strength: Was a field experiment (Had high control over extraneous variables)
What was the aim(s) of Canli’s study?
Does level of emotional intensity affect memory of stimuli?
Is the amygdala sensitive to varying degrees of emotional intensity?
Can cognitive factors lead individuals to describe feelings with any number of emotional labels when physically aroused with no adequate explanation?
Are eye movements related to dream content?
What was the aim(s) of Dement and Kleitman’s study?
Is there a correlation between estimates of dream duration and REM length before waking?
Does dream recall differ between REM and nREM sleep?
Is the amygdala sensitive to varying degrees of emotional intensity?
Does emotional intensity affect memory of stimuli?
Are eye movements related to dream content?
What was the aim(s) of Schachter & Singer’s study?
Is the amygdala sensitive to varying degrees of emotional intensity?
Does emotional intensity affect memory of stimuli?
Can cognitive factors lead individuals to describe feelings with any number of emotional labels when physically aroused with no adequate explanation?
Are eye movements related to dream content?
What was the sample for Canli’s study?
185 male University of Minnesota students taking introductory psychology. received course credit for participation
10 right-handed female volunteers
7 males and 2 female adults
What was the sample for Dement and Kleitman’s study?
185 male University of Minnesota students taking introductory psychology. received course credit for participation
7 males and 2 female adults
10 right-handed female volunteers
What was the sample for Schachter & Singer’s study?
185 male University of Minnesota students taking introductory psychology. received course credit for participation
7 males and 2 female adults
10 right-handed female volunteers
What kind of experiment was Canli’s study?
case study
laboratory experiment
natural experiment
What kind of experiment was Dement and Kleitman’s study?
natural experiment
laboratory experiment
case study
What kind of experiment was Schachter & Singer’s study?
laboratory experiment
natural experiment
case study
What experimental design was used for Canli’s study?
repeated measures design
independent measures design
matched pairs design
What experimental design was used for Dement and Kleitman’s experiment?
repeated measures design
independent measures design
matched pairs design
What experimental design was used for Schachter & Singer’s study?
repeated measures design
independent measures design
matched pairs design
What was the independent variable in Canli’s study?
Whether participants were woken up from REM sleep, nREM sleep, or at random
Knowledge of injections
Intensity of emotional arousal (scale of 0-3; self-reported)
emotional situation placed in
What was the independent variable in Dement and Kleitman’s study?
emotional situation placed in
Whether participants were woken up from REM sleep, nREM sleep, or at random
Intensity of emotional arousal (scale of 0-3; self-reported)
Knowledge of injections
What was the independent variable in Schachter & Singer’s study?
emotional situation placed in
Whether participants were woken up from REM sleep, nREM sleep, or at random
Knowledge of injections
Intensity of emotional arousal (scale of 0-3; self-reported)
What was the dependent variable in Canli’s study?
Amygdala activation (from fMRI)
self-report of emotion felt following arousal
Whether or not participants recalled a dream
memory of stimuli (measured 3 weeks later)
Observations (non-participant observers)
What was the dependent variable in Dement and Kleitman’s study?
Observations (non-participant observers)
Whether or not participants recalled a dream
memory of stimuli (measured 3 weeks later)
Amygdala activation (from fMRI)
self-report of emotion felt following arousal
What was the dependent variable in Schachter & Singer’s study?
Amygdala activation (from fMRI)
Whether or not participants recalled a dream
Observations (non-participant observers)
self-report of emotion felt following arousal
memory of stimuli (measured 3 weeks later)
What were the results of Canli’s study?
Uninterrupted dream stages typically last 3-50 minutes (avg. ~20 min), are longer later at night, and show intermittent bursts of ~2-100 rapid eye movements
in the euphoria condition: misinformed patients reported feeling happier, while informed patients reported feeling the least positive. The same occurred in the anger condition
Participant ratings of emotional intensity reflected the valence and arousal characteristics of stimuli
Scenes rated as highly emotionally intense were recalled better than those rated lower.
What were the results of Dement and Kleitman’s study?
Uninterrupted dream stages typically last 3-50 minutes (avg. ~20 min), are longer later at night, and show intermittent bursts of ~2-100 rapid eye movements
in the euphoria condition: misinformed patients reported feeling happier, while informed patients reported feeling the least positive. The same occurred in the anger condition
Scenes rated as highly emotionally intense were recalled better than those rated lower.
Participant ratings of emotional intensity reflected the valence and arousal characteristics of stimuli
What were the results of Schachter & Singer’s study?
Scenes rated as highly emotionally intense were recalled better than those rated lower.
in the euphoria condition: misinformed patients reported feeling happier, while informed patients reported feeling the least positive. The same occurred in the anger condition
Participant ratings of emotional intensity reflected the valence and arousal characteristics of stimuli
Uninterrupted dream stages typically last 3-50 minutes (avg. ~20 min), are longer later at night, and show intermittent bursts of ~2-100 rapid eye movements
What was the aim(s) of Andrade’s study?
Can exposure therapy reduce the disgust and distress of those with button phobia?
Does telling participants they loved eating asparagus as children cause them to generate false beliefs or memories about asparagus?
Do children imitate behavior (specifically aggression) when they observe it in a role model?
Does doodling (sketching of patterns and figures unrelated to the primary task) aid in information processing (namely memory)?
What was the aim(s) of Baron-Cohen’s study?
Do children imitate behavior (specifically aggression) when they observe it in a role model?
Are there sex differences in performance on ability to distinguish others’ emotions for those with Autism?
Will people with Aspergers or Autism be impaired on the “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test for distinguishing emotions?
Does the “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test correlate with other measures of autistic traits?
What was the aim(s) of Laney’s first experiment?
Does telling participants they loved eating asparagus as children cause them to generate false beliefs or memories about asparagus?
Is the amygdala sensitive to varying degrees of emotional intensity?
Does dream recall differ between REM and nREM sleep?
Is the sight of asparagus more appealing to participants after a false love of asparagus has been conditioned into them?
What was the aim(s) of Laney’s second experiment?
How obedient will people be when receiving orders from an authority figure?
Were the results of Laney’s first experiment reliable?
Is the sight of asparagus more appealing to participants after a false love of asparagus has been conditioned into them?
Can exposure therapy reduce the disgust and distress of those with button phobia?
What was the sample for Andrade’s study?
7 males and 2 female adults
72 children (3-6yo; equal parts boy and girl) from the Stanford University nursery school
40 members of a participant panel at the Medical Research Council unit for cognitive research. 18-55 years old, mainly females (5 males)
15 people with Aspergers/High-Functioning Autism (AS/HFA) & 14 people with similar IQs (1 IQ point average difference)
What was the sample for Baron-Cohen’s study?
15 people with Aspergers/High-Functioning Autism (AS/HFA) & 14 people with similar IQs (1 IQ point average difference)
5 chimpanzees housed within the Primate Research Institute who had been part of many other perceptual and cognitive studies, including some similar to the current aim
122 ‘normal’ adults & 103 ‘normal’ students
72 children (3-6yo; equal parts boy and girl) from the Stanford University nursery school
What was the sample for Laney’s first experiment?
72 children (3-6yo; equal parts boy and girl) from the Stanford University nursery school
128 undergrads (mostly females) at the University of California. Received course credit for participation
40 male (20-50yo) volunteers
~4450 passengers traveling on an underground service between Harlem and the Bronx weekdays (11am-3pm) - opportunity sample
What was the sample for Laney’s second experiment?
72 children (3-6yo; equal parts boy and girl) from the Stanford University nursery school
185 male University of Minnesota students taking introductory psychology. received course credit for participation
1 African Gray parrot (“Alex”) who had been used for research on communication and cognition for 10 years - case study
103 undergrads (mostly females) from the University of Washington. Received course credit for participation
What kind of experiment was Andrade’s study?
natural/quasi-experiment
laboratory experiment
case study
controlled observation (lab setting)
What kind of experiment was Baron-Cohen’s study?
controlled observation (lab setting)
laboratory experiment
case study
natural/quasi-experiment
What kind of experiment was Laney’s first experiment?
case study
laboratory experiment
controlled observation (lab setting)
Field experiment (New York City subway)
What experimental design was used for Andrade’s study?
repeated measures design
matched pairs design
Independent measures design
What experimental design was used for Laney’s study?
repeated measures design
Independent measures design
matched pairs design
What was the independent variable in Andrade’s study?
Type of victim - ‘drunk’ vs ‘ill’
Whether participants had a false belief embedded (love of asparagus)
Whether participants doodled or not
Ability of the chimpanzee to give targeted helping to another chimp - helper chimp can see the tool use situation vs. can’t see tool use situation
What was the independent variable in Baron-Cohen’s study?
Type of participant (AS/HFA, ‘normal’ adult/student, IQ matched group)
Ability of the chimpanzee to give targeted helping to another chimp - helper chimp can see the tool use situation vs. can’t see tool use situation
Type of victim - ‘drunk’ vs ‘ill’
Whether participants doodled or not
What was the independent variable in Laney’s first experiment?
Model type: aggressive, non-aggressive, or none
Whether participants had false belief that they enjoyed asparagus as a child
Gender of the child
Whether participants doodled or not
What was the independent variable in Laney’s second experiment?
Ability of the chimpanzee to give targeted helping to another chimp - helper chimp can see the tool use situation vs. can’t see tool use situation
Type of participant (AS/HFA, ‘normal’ adult/student, IQ matched group)
Whether participants doodled or not
Whether participants had a false belief embedded (love of asparagus)
What was the dependent variable in Andrade’s study?
“Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test score
Place recall - unexpected test
Targeted helping behavior - correct tool vs incorrect tool
Party attendee recall - expected test (plausible mishearings like Craig vs Greg were marked correct)
What was the dependent variable in Baron-Cohen’s study?
Targeted helping behavior - correct tool vs incorrect tool
Level of bystander helping
“Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test score
Score on the AQ test (only used on the AS/HFA and IQ-matched groups)
What was the dependent variable in Laney’s first experiment?
Self-reported responses to 5 different questionnaire
Level of bystander helping
Memory of stimuli (measured 3 weeks later)
“Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test score
What was the dependent variable in Laney’s second experiment?
Whether or not participants recalled a dream
Participant feedback to a 20-picture slideshow of common foods
Self-reported responses to 4 questionnaires
Level of bystander helping
What were the results of Andrade’s study?
Subject correctly responded to 76.6% of trials, demonstrating that parrots can distinguish between ‘same’ and ‘different’
Children with aggressive models imitated their models’ exact behavior, and were more aggressive than than the other two model groups
Participant ratings of emotional intensity reflected the valence and arousal characteristics of stimuli
Doodlers recalled 29% more names and places on average compared to non-doodlers
What were the results of Baron-Cohen’s study?
Participants in the AS/HFA group were significantly worse at identifying target words that the control groups
Sex characteristics were apparent between males and females on the test, but they weren’t significant
Doodlers recalled 29% more names and places on average compared to non-doodlers
Children with aggressive models imitated their models’ exact behavior, and were more aggressive than than the other two model groups
What were the results of Laney’s first experiment?
Doodlers recalled 29% more names and places on average compared to non-doodlers
Subject correctly responded to 76.6% of trials, demonstrating that parrots can distinguish between ‘same’ and ‘different’
Responses from people in the ‘love asparagus’ condition rose on average from 1.5 to 4.1 after false feedback from researchers was given
Participant ratings of emotional intensity reflected the valence and arousal characteristics of stimuli
What were the results of Laney’s second experiment?
Nearly 80% of victims received spontaneous help before model could intervene
Love group reported loving asparagus the first time they tried it significantly more than the control group
Believers reported a significantly greater desire to eat asparagus than the control group
Believers rated the asparagus photo as more appetizing than the control group
Piliavin: How many participants were recorded
4150
4450
4050
Piliavin: What do you know about the sample?
Racial difference
Gender difference
Age difference
Piliavin: What type of experiment was it?
Field
Laboratory
Natural
Piliavin: Where was the victim
Adjacent area
Critical area
Piliavin: What is the difference between early and late condition
When the study ended
Victim's collapse time
Subject's help time
Model's help time
Piliavin: How many researchers/stooges were on the train
2 males 1 female
2 males 2 females
1 male 3 females
Piliavin: Out of the 103 trials, how many were given help
91/103
81/103
79/103
89/103
Piliavin: How many cane trials were provided to help
61
62
55
75
Piliavin: Type of sampling?
Opportunity
Volunteer
Random
Piliavin: Independent variable?
Sex of Victims
Race of the model
Types of victims
The race of the helper
Piliavin: Aim 1?
Would a cane victim get more help than drunk
Would a victim get more help than the subjects
Would a victim get more help than the model
Piliavin: How many participants moved away from the victim?
23%
20%
30%
54%
Piliavin: How many times was the victim helped by more than 1 person?
72%
60%
55%
28%
Piliavin: Dependent variables?
Type of help
Comments made by passengers
Height of passengers
Total number of helpers
Piliavin: What was the racial mix of passengers estimated in Piliavin's study?
38% black, 62% white
29% black, 71% white
45% black, 55% white
Yamamoto: What is the main psychological concept being investigated?
Empathy
Instrumental helping
Altruism
Prosocial behavior
Yamamoto: How do other animals engage in helping compared to humans?
Other animals engage in helping behavior only at the request of other animals
Other animals engage in more altruistic behavior than humans do
Other animals do not engage in helping behavior at all
Yamamoto: What do recent studies show about primates and helping behavior?
Only humans are capable of helping and food sharing without direct benefit
Primates only engage in helping behavior if there is a direct benefit to them
Primates are not capable of helping or food sharing
Some primates (other than humans) have the capacity for helping and food sharing without direct benefit to them.
Yamamoto: What is the main aim?
To investigate the feeding behavior of chimpanzees
To investigate the communication abilities of chimpanzees
To investigate the social hierarchy of chimpanzees
To investigate whether chimpanzees have the ability and flexibility to help another chimpanzee depending on its specific needs
Yamamoto: Research method?
Case
Field
Laboratory
Natural
Yamamoto: What experimental design was used?
Matched pairs
Repeated measures
Independent measures
Yamamoto: Independent variable
Proportion of trial where the stick or straw was given or not given
Sampling technique
"Can see" and "cannot see" conditions
Yamamoto: Dependent variable
Age of chimpanzees
Proportion of trial where the stick or straw was given or not given
Sampling technique
‘Can see’ and ‘cannot see’ conditions
Yamamoto: In the first can see condition of the Yamamoto study, what percentage of trials resulted in something from the box being offered to the other chimp?
95.3%
80.2%
70.5%
90.8%
Yamamoto: According to the first can see condition of the Yamamoto study, what percentage of the __._% of trials where an object was offered came after the other chimp had requested help?
90%
80%
96%
100%
Yamamoto: In the first can see condition of the Yamamoto study, which of the following chimps offered the straw or stick first in the highest percentage of trials?
Ai
Pal
Ayumu
Cleo
Yamamoto: What conclusion can be drawn from the first can see condition regarding chimps' ability to distinguish between potential tools and useless objects?
They cannot distinguish between the two.
They can distinguish between the two.
They can only distinguish when given more information.
They can only distinguish when a human is present.
Yamamoto: In the cannot see condition of the Yamamoto study, what percentage of trials resulted in something from the box being offered to the other chimp?
99.8%
95.8%
85.8%
Yamamoto: How many chimps were tested in the second can see condition of the Yamamoto study?
5
2
3
4
Yamamoto: How many conditions were there?
2
4
3
Saavedra and Silverman: A phobia is a fear that is..
Out of proportion to the danger; constant
About something life threatening
Irrational
Easy to overcome
Saavedra and Silverman: The sample in this study is
9 year old Hispanic girl
A 9 year old Hispanic boy
8 year old Hispanic boy
Saavedra and Silverman: Research method
Field Experiment
Independent measures
Lab experiment
Case Study
Naturalistic Observation
Saavedra and Silverman: The phobia began when
A bowl of buttons fell on the child
The child was hurt by someone wearing a lot of buttons
The child got hurt by a button on their shirt
The children were annoyed by the buttons in their uniform
Saavedra and Silverman: Which did not happen in the Positive Reinforcement Therapy / Behavioural exposure stage of treatment
Treatment sessions lasted for 30 mins with the boy
Subjective ratings were noted about the buttons he feared
A hierarchy of fear was followed during exposure
He imagined buttons falling on him
Saavedra and Silverman: The following finding is incorrect
Subjective ratings of distress increased dramatically from session 2 to session 3 and continued to rise from session 3 to session 4
His ratings of distress were decreasing, not increasing during in-vivo exposures to buttons
At the post-treatment assessment the boy no longer met DSM-IV criteria for specific phobia of buttons.
There was success observed in the number of buttons the boy manipulated
Saavedra and Silverman: The DSM-IV diagnosis concluded that he had which type of abnormality?
Obsessive-compulsive disorder
Agoraphobia
Arachnophobia
Specific Phobia
Saavedra and Silverman: The distress rating for hugging mum when she wears large plastic buttons was...
6
7
4
5
Saavedra and Silverman: Sampling method
random sampling
volunteer sampling
opportunity sampling
Saavedra and Silverman: Which of the following is true of the "Feelings Thermometer"
All other answers are correct
Included 9 points
Was a scale of disgust
Operationalized the fear of buttons
Saavedra and Silverman: The therapy that the participant was to receive involved...
gradual increased behavioral exposure to buttons only
both behavioral exposure to buttons and imagery/cognitions
all of the above are incorrect
looking into the boy's disgust imagery and cognitions only
Saavedra and Silverman: The imagery sessions involved all of the following except?
Imagining how the buttons felt
Imagining how the buttons looked
Imagining how the buttons smelled
Imagining how the buttons tasted
Saavedra and Silverman: The distress ratings and severity ratings represent what kind of data
Both Qualitative and Quantitative
Qualitative
Neither Qualitative nor Qualitative
Quantitative
Saavedra and Silverman: A subtype of classical conditioning where attitudes toward stimuli are the result of complex cognitive process and feelings is called ...
Imitative learning
Evaluative learning
Expectancy learning
Saavedra and Silverman: Identify areas in which researchers adhered to the research ethical conducts.
Protection from harm
Withdrawal
Consent
Anonymity
Saavedra and Silverman: The followings were NOT true about the Feeling Thermometer
Was developed by researchers
Of 0 - 8 scale
Was developed by the boy
A nine point scale
Of 0 - 9 scale
What is classical conditioning?
Learning explained by its consequences
Learning explained by modelling
Learning by responding to environmental stimuli
Learning caused by pairing and association of two stimuli
What was the aim(s) of Bandura’s experiment?
Do children imitate behavior (specifically aggression) when they observe it in a role model?
How obedient will people be when receiving orders from an authority figure?
Will people be obedient even if it meant someone could be seriously hurt?
Does the sex of a role model/child matter when it comes to observational learning?
What was the aim(s) of Pepperberg’s study?
Can chimpanzees understand the needs of a member of the same species?
What factors (victim type, victim race, model behavior, or bystander group size) affect Good Samaritanism most?
Could a parrot use vocal labels to demonstrate understanding of the idea ‘same’ vs ‘different’?
Can cognitive factors lead individuals to describe feelings with any number of emotional labels when physically aroused with no adequate explanation?
What was the sample for Bandura’s experiment?
122 ‘normal’ adults & 103 ‘normal’ students
15 people with Aspergers/High-Functioning Autism (AS/HFA) & 14 people with similar IQs (1 IQ point average difference)
72 children (3-6yo; equal parts boy and girl) from the Stanford University nursery school
40 male (20-50yo) volunteers
What was the sample for Pepperberg’s study?
~4450 passengers traveling on an underground service between Harlem and the Bronx weekdays (11am-3pm) - opportunity sample
One 9 year old Hispanic American boy with a phobia of buttons (case study)
5 chimpanzees housed within the Primate Research Institute who had been part of many other perceptual and cognitive studies, including some similar to the current aim
1 African Gray parrot (“Alex”) who had been used for research on communication and cognition for 10 years - case study
What kind of experiment was Bandura’s experiment?
Natural experiment
Case study
Controlled observation (Lab setting)
Laboratory experiment
What kind of experiment was Pepperberg’s study?
Controlled observation (Lab setting)
Laboratory experiment
Case study
Natural
What experimental design was used for Bandura’s experiment?
Matched pairs design
Repeated measures design
Independent measures design
What was the independent variable in Bandura’s experiment?
Model type: aggressive, non-aggressive, or none
Gender of the child
Model gender: same as child or opposite of child
Model behavior - close to victim vs distant
What was the dependent variable in Bandura’s experiment?
Whether or not participants recalled a dream
Targeted helping behavior - correct tool vs incorrect tool
“Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test score
What learning the child displayed - aggressive or non-aggressive tendencies
What were the results of Bandura’s experiment?
Children with aggressive models imitated their models’ exact behavior, and were more aggressive than than the other two model groups
Boys were more physically aggressive than girls, while girls were slightly more verbally aggressive than boys
Responses from people in the ‘love asparagus’ condition rose on average from 1.5 to 4.1 after false feedback from researchers was given
Boys were significantly more likely to imitate the same-sex model that girls, though the effect was still mirrored in the girls
Pepperberg: Subject correctly responded to ____% of trials, demonstrating that parrots can distinguish between ‘same’ and ‘different’
69.6
76.6%
70%
78.3%
What was the aim to Milgram's study?
To test the average persons ability to make a important decision on there own.
To see if ordinary people could stand being given harmful electric shots.
To investigate whether ordinary people would follow orders and give an innocent person a potentially harmful electric shock.
Milgram: How many participants were involved in the experiment?
40
60
50
Milgram: Where did the experiment take place?
Minnesota University
Stanford University
Yale University
Milgram: Participants were told the purpose of the experiment was..
To see how people learn better through punishment.
To see what level of electric shock an individual could experience safely.
To see if ordinary people could give innocent people harmful electric shocks.
Milgram: Participants were asked to teach..
Retention of matching rhyming words.
Retention of matched paired words.
Math equations
Milgram: The maximum voltage of available electric shocks to be given were ...
450v
400v
350v
300v
Milgram: What percentage of participants administered the maximum 450v?
50%
60%
65%
55%
Milgram: What percentage of participants dropped out of the experiment?
15.5%
20%
12.5%
40%
Milgram: How is the experiment internally reliable?
Some of the participants dropped out.
All of the participants completed the experiment.
All of the participants had the same experience.
Milgram: How was the experiment internally Valid?
There was no bias, because the participants had no idea what was really going on.
The participants weren't really being electric shocked.
All participants were allowed to drop out at any point.
Milgram: What could make the study not internally valid?
The participants secretly did not believe the electric shocks to be real.
The participants were told the electric shocks were real.
The participants could hear the screams from the learners.
Milgram: What is one ethical issue with these study?
The participants were told the whole truth about the study.
The participants were put at risk of physical harm.
The experimenter was deceptive when explaining the study to the participants.
Which is learning approach?
To understand the influence of biological factors such as genetics, biochemistry, the physiology of the nervous system, and evolution on human behavior
Proposes that behaviour is acquired by learning experiences
The influences a society can have on an individual's actions, behaviors, feelings, and thoughts
How the interactions of thinking, emotion, creativity, and problem-solving abilities affect how and why you think the way you do
Which is cognitive approach?
Proposes that behaviour is acquired by learning experiences
How the interactions of thinking, emotion, creativity, and problem-solving abilities affect how and why you think the way you do
To understand the influence of biological factors such as genetics, biochemistry, the physiology of the nervous system, and evolution on human behavior
The influences a society can have on an individual's actions, behaviors, feelings, and thoughts
Which is biological approach?
How the interactions of thinking, emotion, creativity, and problem-solving abilities affect how and why you think the way you do
To understand the influence of biological factors such as genetics, biochemistry, the physiology of the nervous system, and evolution on human behavior
The influences a society can have on an individual's actions, behaviors, feelings, and thoughts
Proposes that behaviour is acquired by learning experiences
Which is social approach?
The influences a society can have on an individual's actions, behaviors, feelings, and thoughts
To understand the influence of biological factors such as genetics, biochemistry, the physiology of the nervous system, and evolution on human behavior
Proposes that behaviour is acquired by learning experiences
How the interactions of thinking, emotion, creativity, and problem-solving abilities affect how and why you think the way you do
What approach was the Milgram Study?
Social
Cognitive
Learning
Biological
What approach was the Piliavin Study?
Biological
Social
Cognitive
Learning
What approach was the Yamamoto Study?
Cognitve
Learning
Biological
Social
What approach was the Canli Study?
Learning
Social
Cognitive
Biological
What approach was the Schachter and Singer Study?
Biological
Cognitive
Social
Learning
What approach was the Andrade Study?
Social
Learning
Cognitive
Biological
What approach was the Laney Study?
Learning
Social
Biological
Cognitive
What approach was the Baron Cohen Study?
Cognitive
Biological
Social
Learning
What approach was the Saavedra and Silverman Study?
Learning
Social
Biological
Cognitive
What approach was the Bandura Study?
Cognitive
Learning
Social
Biological
What approach was the Pepperberg Study?
Learning
Social
Cognitive
Biological
