1. An arguer's responsibility to demonstrate a sufficient case on the preposition

1. It is an organized argument or contest of ideas in which participants discuss a topic- usually philosophical, social and/or political in nature

The purpose here is not to discover the truth

(a)  

1. It is an opposition option on definition where they believe that the definition is unreasonable

1. It refers both to the reasoning and to the evidence.

1. Oral one-on-one argumentation in which debaters attempt to convince the judge of the acceptability of their side of a proposition with a communicative style of delivery.

A claim made in support of or in opposition to the proposition.

(a)  

1. A comparative analysis of the strength and weaknesses of the case of the both sides.

1. Reply speech (time) of Asian Parliamentary

The exchange of arguments on a topic

(a)  

1. A claim advanced by a support.

1. Interpretation of the motion in a debate

Solution to a problem through a policy or model.

(a)  

1. Refers to the state of policy surrounding a problem.

1. This meant to counter the reasoning of the targeted argument

1. Essentially a rebuttal towards rebuttal

1. 2 on 2 debate where affirmative team proposes a plan and the negative team argues why that plan should not be adopted. 

1. Structuring your points into a persuasive speech

1. The complete set of speeches given by the affirmative and negative in a particular debate competition

1. Very vague motions

1. Refutes at  first instance the case of DPM, reestablish the case of opposition and advances an arguments.

This is not necessarily the proposition. Instead, it could be a reason to support or reject the proposition (sometimes called a contention).

(a)  

This is the ‘grounds’ or ‘support’ given to elevate the claim from opinion to argument.

(a)  

The idea where the judge evaluated the debate on his/her personal basis and not how the debate technically flowed

(a)  

  Is something that is to be achieved

(a)  

Is the proposed policy or mechanism or the “model”

(a)  

Type of opposition’s option on def challenge where both reject and accept the definition

(a)  

   Also referred to as philosophical debates.

(a)  

Solution to a policy through a model

(a)  

Opens the debate; defines the motion; advances arguments

(a)  

Engages with new materials from the CG; refutes the contribution of the opening teams; considers exploiting contradictions between OG and CG

(a)  

Active listening and understanding the points made by others

(a)  

Described as prolonged argumentation at the societal level spanning, space, and time

(a)  

The expected outcome of a proposition absent a debate

(a)  

A statement that affirms or denies something

(a)  

The purpose of this is to set clear parameters for the debate

(a)  

  No logical relation with the actual meaning of the motion or the words in it

(a)  

Does not allow debate to happen; self-evident; obvious truth

(a)  

Targets an opponent’s argument and aims to prove that their argument is incorrect

(a)  

A conclusion of the entire argument as to why it proves/negates the given motion

(a)  

An explanation as to why that claim is true, The "because" of your statement

(a)  

A statement of claim or premise

(a)  

Speeches in the main debate

(a)  

The option to neither accept nor reject outright the definition

(a)  

The purpose is to restate & clarify the standard of proof that each team must adhere to. — Room of Debate 

(a)  

A situation or a reality referred to as bad & what the debate will want to solve

(a)  

Give supporting facts to strengthen the reasoning

(a)  

Refutes and negates the motion

(a)  

A convention deriving from debates

(a)  

Meaning the group of people in the room whom you are trying to convince

(a)  

It is where you point out and explain the flaws in the opposing team's arguments

(a)  

The speakers who support their respective partners, while adding new arguments

(a)  

They are the primarily summary speakers who should present and characterize the story of the debate in favor of their side

(a)  

this definitions are prone to definitional response challenge from opposition

(a)  

the speaker role engages with opening teams by holistically addressing contributions from government and considering refutation of the opposition, offers an extension and explains how closing government's position fits into debate

(a)  

sells the extension, rebuts member of a position contribution and makes an issue based rebuttal of the oppositions case and summarizes the case of the government

(a)  

this speaker role response directly to the case of the government by giving a direct clash and advance the argument they may challenge the motion if the definition is challengeable.

(a)  

Refutes the case of the deputy prime minister reestablished the case of the opposition and advances and argument

(a)  

engages with new material from closing government refutes opening teams contributions considers exploiting contradictions between opening government and closing government offers an extension for opposition explains how closing oppositions position fits into debate

(a)  

this speaker role refutes at first instance the case of a position, reestablish the government's claim, and advances arguments

(a)