NEW
Font size
WorksheetsAchashverosh Ascends the Throne of Persia - Year 5
Total questions: 21
Worksheet time: 11mins
What year did King Achashverosh ascend the throne of Persia according to the text?
3392 after the creation of the world
2000 BC
127 BC
3392 BC
How did King Achashverosh impress the people and establish his government?
Through peaceful negotiations
By impressing the people with his riches and power
By claiming his rightful heir to the throne
Through democratic elections
How many countries did King Achashverosh's kingdom encompass?
127 countries
100 countries
150 countries
200 countries
Who did King Achashverosh marry?
The daughter of the Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar
The granddaughter of the Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar
Vashti
The daughter of the Persian King Cyrus
How did King Achashverosh rule?
With a lenient approach
By seeking advice from his ministers
With an iron hand, never hesitating to persecute those he suspected of treason
Through democratic means
What was the relationship between Vashti and Nebuchadnezzar?
Vashti was Nebuchadnezzar's daughter
Vashti was Nebuchadnezzar's sister
Vashti was Nebuchadnezzar's wife
Vashti was Nebuchadnezzar's granddaughter
Who issued a royal edict permitting the Jews to rebuild the Bet Hamikdash - the Holy Temple?
King Solomon
King David
King Cyrus of Persia
King Nebuchadnezzar
What was the name of the temple that the Jews were permitted to rebuild in Jerusalem?
The Temple of Solomon
The Bet Hamikdash - the Holy Temple
The Second Temple
The Temple of Herod
Where was the Bet Hamikdash - the Holy Temple located?
Babylon
Persia
Jerusalem
Egypt
What did the Samaritans do to interfere with the rebuilding of the Beit Mikdash according to the text?
They physically destroyed the construction.
They bribed Persian governors.
They joined the Jews in the rebuilding effort.
They spread support for the Persian rule.
What was the intention behind the Samaritans' actions as described in the text?
To support the Persian rule over Yehudah.
To help the Jews rebuild the Beit Mikdash.
To rebel and free themselves from Persian rule.
To convert to Judaism.
Why did the Samaritans decide to lie according to the text?
Because they wanted to rebuild the Temple.
Because they knew no law could be cancelled without the king's agreement.
Because they were forced by the Jews.
Because they wanted to stop the rebuilding of the walls.
What were the Jews doing according to the Samaritans' lie?
They were only rebuilding the Temple.
They were attacking the Samaritans.
They were also rebuilding the walls around Jerusalem.
They were cancelling a law without the king's agreement.
Why were the Samaritans frightened to tell a lie?
Because they didn't want to lie
Because the lie might be easily discovered
Because they were honest people
Because they had no reason to lie
What was the Samaritans' plan to avoid being held responsible for the lie?
To tell the truth instead
To leave the country
To bribe the secretaries of the King
To write the lie in their own language
What did the secretaries add to the manuscript to help the Samaritans' plan?
The name of the Samaritans
The words "fortress-walls"
A map of the Beit Mikdash
A signature of the King
What would happen if the Samaritans' lie was discovered?
They would be rewarded
It would seem to be an accidental mistake in the translation
The secretaries would be punished
The Beit Mikdash would be destroyed
Who were the two secretaries who presented the document to the King?
Rachum and Haman
Rachum and Shamshi
Shamshi and Haman's sons
Rachum and Haman's sons
What was the outcome of the secretaries' plan?
The Jews continued building the Beit Mikdash in Jerusalem
The Jews were ordered to stop building the Beit Mikdash in Jerusalem
The Jews were encouraged to build the Beit Mikdash elsewhere
The document was rejected by the King
What was Shamshi's relationship to Haman?
Shamshi was Haman's father
Shamshi was Haman's brother
Shamshi was one of Haman's sons
Shamshi was unrelated to Haman
How did the two secretaries feel towards the Jews?
They were indifferent
They felt bitter hatred
They were supportive
They were sympathetic
