WorksheetsTAM ACT 3 QUIZ
Total questions: 38
Worksheet time: 28mins
What does FOUR suggest about the fingerprints on the knife?
They were smudged.
There weren't any fingerprints.
They were clear and visible.
They were wiped with a cloth.
What does THREE suggest doing to verify the old man's testimony?
Re-enact the scene
Call the old man
Visit the crime scene
Time the event
What does FOUR conclude about the murderer’s actions after the murder?
The murderer stayed in the room.
The murderer ran down the hall and stairs.
The murderer confessed immediately.
The murderer hid in the closet.
What does ELEVEN mention about the light in the hall?
It is very bright.
It is just enough to see the steps.
It is completely dark.
It is flickering.
What does EIGHT want to demonstrate with the knife?
Its sharpness
Its weight
Its handling
Its color
What does EIGHT suggest about the timing of the murder?
It was random
It was during a loud event
It was during a quiet night
It was in broad daylight
What does EIGHT question about the kid's actions?
The kid's choice of weapon
The kid's motive
The kid's intelligence
The kid's alibi
What is the woman across the street doing when she witnesses the murder?
reading a book
watching t.v.
eating dinner
lying in bed
What information does Juror Five have about switch knives?
They are usually used to stab people straight-on.
They are usually used to stab people underhandedly,
They are usually used to stab people overhandedly.
They are usually used to slash, not stab, people.
What piece of information does Juror Six observe that changes the perspective on the woman's testimony?
The woman was deaf.
The woman wore glasses.
The woman owned cats.
The woman was a gamer.
What is the title of the person who is standing trial for a crime?
Prosecutor
Attorney
Defendant
Judge
Match the term with the definition: one of the protections in our justice system; this means not biased or unfairly prejudiced; this means that none of the members of the jury can have an unfair stigma
about the person on trial
Impartial jury
Prosecution
Defendant
Charge
What is the problem with declaring a “hung jury”?
The jury would have to hang the boy.
There would be a mistrial and the boy would need have another trial.
The jury would send the boy to a prison in Alaska because of the law.
The judge would have to be tried as a criminal.
What is the "burden of proof"?
The responsibility of the jury to come up with the right verdict.
The responsibility a person has to prove they are innocent.
The principle that states the defendant does not have to prove anything but the prosecution must prove guilt.
What is the main conflict in Act 2 of 12 Angry Men?
Conflict with the judge
Disagreement among the jurors
Physical fight between the jurors
Agreement among the jurors
What does Juror TEN express about the neighborhood where the crime occurred?
It is a peaceful area.
It is a rural area.
It is known for its high crime rate.
It is a wealthy neighborhood.
What does Juror Nine observe about the old man's physical condition?
He is very tall.
He has a limp.
He is very agile.
He is very young.
What does Juror Twelve suggest about the boy's alibi?
It is irrelevant to the case.
It is weak and inconsistent.
It is supported by multiple witnesses.
It is very strong.
What does Juror Five reveal about his personal experience with the neighborhood?
He has friends living there.
He works in that neighborhood.
He grew up in a similar neighborhood.
He has never visited such areas.
What motivates Juror 8 to demand a secret ballot in Act 3 of "Twelve Angry Men"?
He wants to pressure the other jurors into changing their votes.
He believes it will give those unsure about their decision a chance to vote honestly.
He is trying to create conflict among the jurors.
He wants to speed up the deliberation process.
How does Juror 3's relationship with his own son impact his decision-making in Act 3?
It makes him more empathetic towards the defendant.
It has no impact on his decision-making.
It causes him to be more biased and stubborn.
It leads him to change his vote to not guilty.
How does the dialogue in Act 3 between Jurors 8 and 9 about the old man witness affect the jury's perspective?
It makes the jury more sympathetic towards the old man.
It raises doubts about the reliability of the old man's testimony.
It reinforces the jury's confidence in the old man's testimony.
It has no impact on the jury's perspective.
In Act 3, how does the heat in the jury room symbolize the tension among the jurors?
It represents the jurors' growing impatience and irritability.
It signifies the melting away of prejudices.
It illustrates the comfort and ease of the deliberation process.
It has no symbolic meaning and is only a detail of the setting.
What impact does Juror 11's speech about democracy and the importance of the jury system have on the other jurors in Act 3?
It convinces all the jurors to immediately vote "not guilty."
It reinforces the gravity of their responsibility and the importance of their decision.
It causes several jurors to become more entrenched in their prejudices.
It has little to no impact, as the jurors are focused on the evidence.
How does the dialogue in Act 3 contribute to the development of the theme of justice?
It shows that justice can only be achieved through conflict and argument.
It illustrates how personal biases can obstruct the path to justice.
It demonstrates that justice is always swift and certain.
It suggests that justice is less important than reaching a quick verdict.
Match the term with the definition: the person or persons who are bringing the lawsuit
Defendant
Impartial jury
Sentence
Prosecution
Match the term with the definition: to debate; in a trial, the twelve jurors must go to a separate room to ___
and reach an agreement
sentence
deliberate
convict
charge
In "12 Angry Men," how does the concept of reasonable doubt play a role in overcoming bias?
It is ignored by all jurors throughout the deliberations
It is used to justify the jurors' initial biases
It is introduced as a legal standard that challenges the jurors to question their biases
It is only relevant to the judge's instructions and not the jurors
How does Juror 8 demonstrate the importance of setting aside personal biases?
By refusing to deliberate
By focusing on the facts and seeking justice
By being the first to vote "guilty"
By using his social status to influence others
In "12 Angry Men," how does the concept of reasonable doubt play a role in overcoming bias?
It is ignored by all jurors throughout the deliberations
It is used to justify the jurors' initial biases
It is introduced as a legal standard that challenges the jurors to question their biases
It is only relevant to the judge's instructions and not the jurors
What was the final verdict?
not guilty
guilty
hung jury
they are still deciding
