Font size
WorksheetsSolving Systems by Gaussian Elimination
Total questions: 15
Worksheet time: 17mins
If a matrix is in reduced row echelon form, then it is also in row echelon form.
True
False
If an elementary row operation is applied to a matrix that is in row echelon form, the resulting matrix will still be in row echelon form.
True
False
Every matrix has a unique row echelon form.
True
False
A homogeneous linear system in n unknowns whose corresponding augmented matrix has a reduced row echelon form with r leading 1's has n−r free variables.
True
False
All leading 1's in a matrix in row echelon form must occur in different columns.
True
False
If every column of a matrix in row echelon form has a leading 1, then all entries that are not leading 1's are zero.
True
False
If a homogeneous linear system of n equation in n unknowns has a corresponding augmented matrix with a reduced row echelon form containing n leading 1's, then the linear system has only the trivial solution.
True
False
If the reduced row echelon form of the augmented matrix for a linear system has a row of zeros, then the system must have infinitely many solutions.
True
False
If a linear system has more unknowns than equations, then it must have infinitely many solutions
True
False
This is an example of a
System of Quadratic Equations
Reduced Row Echelon Form
Augmented Matrix
A Canine Doing a Backflip
Using back-substitution, calculate the solution for the REF matrix.
(3, -6, 3)
(-6, -6, 3)
(6, -6, 3)
(-6, -6, 3)
Johnny was using Gaussian Elimination to simplify the matrix. What did he do wrong in this step?
To get a zero for a number you should multiply the same row by its' reciprocal
If you multiply a number to a row you have to change that row too
He added the numbers incorrectly
Nothing. This step was correct.
Jessica is simplifying the matrix using Gaussian Elimination. Did she complete the step correctly?
No, she should have changed the 2 to a zero and multiplied -2 by R2 and added R1
No, she wanted to change the 3 to a zero so she should have multiplied R2 and added it to R3
Yes. When you need a zero you multiply by the number's reciprocal.
No. Just punch in the calculator. Who cares about Carl Gauss
Which row command is an appropriate next step?
7R2 + R3 -> R3
-7R1 + R3 -> R3
7R3 -> R3
-7R2 + R3 -> R3
What is an appropriate first row command to solve this by Gaussian Elimination?
2R2 + R2 -> R2
-2R1 + R2 -> R2
R3 +R2 --> R3
2R1 + R2 --> R2
