NEW
Font size
WorksheetsQui, Quae, Quod - Latin Relative Pronouns
Total questions: 10
Worksheet time: 10mins
How is the imperfect form of "possum" formed ("he/she was able")
pos+vi, visti, vit, etc...
pot+eram, eras, erat, etc...
pot+o, es, est, etc...
There are no rules, any verb could be an imperfect form of possum.
What is the function of a relative clause?
It is nominal clause, it acts as the subject or object of the sentence.
It is an adverbial clause, it explains why, when, or how the main clause happened.
It is an adjectival clause, it describes a noun in the main clause.
It is the main clause of a sentence.
Where does a relative pronoun (qui, quae, quod) take its person and number from when used in a relative clause?
Relative pronouns are always only neuter singular (eg quod)
It depends on the tense of the verb in the relative clause
It's function in the relative clause (ie whether it is the subject or object of the verb in the clause)
It's antecedent (the noun in the main clause it is referring back to)
What determines a relative pronoun's (qui, quae, quod) case in a relative clause.
Relative pronouns are used adverbially, so their case is always neuter accusative.
It depends on the tense of the verb in the relative clause
It's function in the relative clause (ie whether it is the subject or object of the verb in the clause)
It's antecedent (the noun in the main clause it is referring back to)
What is the difference between "in+abl" and "in+acc"
in+acc does not indicate motion, in+ abl means motion "into"
in only takes the ablative, not the accusative
in+abl does not indicate motion, in+ acc means motion "into"
They are used interchangeably, there is no difference
How can "quam" function?
either as a relative pronoun ("who") or as a subordinating conjunction in a causal clause ("because")
either as a subordinating conjunction in a causal clause ("because") or as an adverb introducing comparison ("than")
either as a relative pronoun ("which") or as an adverb introducing comparison ("than")
It only functions as an accusative singular relative pronoun ("who" or "which")
How can "quod" function?
either as a relative pronoun ("who") or as a subordinating conjunction in a causal clause ("because")
either as a subordinating conjunction in a causal clause ("because") or as an adverb introducing comparison ("than")
either as a relative pronoun ("which") or as an adverb introducing comparison ("than")
It only functions as an nominative or accusative singular neuter relative pronoun ("who" or "which")
What declensions are litus, mare, sacerdos, and agmen
They are all 3rd declension
2nd, 3rd (pure i-stem), 2nd, and 3rd
4th, 3rd (pure i-stem), 3rd, and 3rd
4th, 3rd (pure 1-stem), 2nd, and 3rd
How would this sentence best be translated: "alius āthlēta Canticus, quī perītissimus erat, discum longius quam cēterī ēmīsit."
Furthermore, Canticus, who was very afraid, sent the discus to the other athlete, who was a long way away.
Another athlete, Canticus, who was very scared, threw the discus a long way away, which is where the others were.
Another Cantincan athlete, who was very skilled, threw the discus farther than the others.
Another athete, Canticus, who was the most skilled, threw the discuss further away to the other.
What is the best translation for this sentence: "Dumnorix, ubi saxō appropinquāvit, nāvem subitō ad dextram vertit, quod scopulus sub undīs latebat."
When he approached the rock, Dumnorix immediately turned the ship to the right because a reef was lying under the waves.
Where the rock was drawing near, Dumnorix at once turned towards the ship's right because a reef lay beneath the sea.
Dumnorix, when a rock approached, immediately turned the ship's right beneath which an ocean reef was lying.
Dumnorix, where he was drawing near to the rock, immediately turned the ship to the right which was concealing a reef under the waves.
