NEW
Font size
WorksheetsLogical Reasoning & Fallacies Practice - Homework
Total questions: 65
Worksheet time: 1hrs 5mins
A personal attack meant to discredit one’s opponent
Ad Hominem
Appeal to Nature
Bandwagon
Circular Reasoning
Guilt by Association
Assumes the POPULAR choice is always the best choice
Ad Hominem
Appeal to Nature
Bandwagon
Circular Reasoning
Guilt by Association
Supports a claim with the claim itself
Red Herring
Appeal to Nature
Bandwagon
Circular Reasoning
Guilt by Association
The use of a completely unrelated topic in support of a claim
Red Herring
Appeal to Nature
Bandwagon
Circular Reasoning
Guilt by Association
A very broad claim based on very little evidence
False Causation
False Dichotomy
Hasty Generalization
Straw Man
A misrepresentation of an opponent’s position that makes it easier to argue against
False Causation
False Dichotomy
Hasty Generalization
Straw Man
Officer, I was only driving as fast as everyone around me. I'm sure I wasn't speeding.
Ad Hominem
Appeal to Nature
Bandwagon
Circular Reasoning
Guilt by Association
Sure, we haven't given raises to our employees in more than ten years. However, we do pride ourselves on providing customer service in over seven different languages.
Red Herring
Appeal to Nature
Bandwagon
Circular Reasoning
Guilt by Association
No one in your family surfs? But I thought you said you lived in California before this.
False Causation
False Dichotomy
Hasty Generalization
Straw Man
A conclusion based on the premise, “if this, then that” often, the assembly of a causal chain of events that result in an unlikely or extreme outcome
strawman
slippery slope
ad populum
circular reasoning
An oversimplification of and subsequent attack on the viewpoint of another or the misrepresentation of the viewpoint of another
Slippery slope
ad populum
strawman
circular reasoning
Using an argument’s conclusion as a premise for proving the argument
slippery slope
strawman
ad populum
circular reasoning
Identify the fallacy.
false analogy
ad populum (bandwagon)
ad hominem
circular reasoning
An error in thinking or reasoning
Logical Fallacy
Opinion
Main Idea
Conflict
A conclusion or reply that does not follow the previous statement in a logical manner.
non sequitur
hasty generalization
false analogy
red herring
A general statement or conclusion that is made without sufficient evidence
false analogy
non sequitur
hasty generalization
red herring
An analogy that incorrectly connects two things based on other shared characteristics
ad hominem
false analogy
red herring
hasty generalization
A tactic that is used to distract from an argument by avoiding key issues or ignoring opposing views
non sequitur
ad hominem
false analogy
red herring
An attack on or criticism of someone’s character rather than the logic or content of the argument
ad hominem
false analogy
red herring
hasty generalization
Oh, please. What would you know about labor laws? You don’t even have a job.
Ad Hominem
Fear
Hasty Generalization
Appeal to emotion
She was wearing cowboy boots in her last Instagram picture so she must be into country music.
Hasty Generalization
Circular Reasoning
Ad populum
No fallacy
What is deductive reasoning?
An argument that attacks the man and not the argument
The reasoning most used by detectives
Reasoning that relies on patterns and incomplete information to offer the most likely and simplest explanation
Reasoning beginning with a broad general statement to end up with a specific factual statement
A logical fallacy that draws an extreme or unlikely conclusion about consequences of an action is called
ad hominem
slippery slope
red herring
hasty generalization
Reasoning used by detectives based on specific observations, knowledge of patterns and incomplete information to offer the most likely explanation is called
abductive reasoning
deductive reasoning
an argument
inductive reasoning
I bought an apple every day for a week and each one was bruised, so if I buy an apple today it will also be bruised. This is an example of
inductive reasoning
slippery slope
red herring
deductive reasoning
All even numbers are divisible by two, therefore, 14 is divisible by two. This is an example of
Inductive reasoning
Abductive reasoning
Deductive reasoning
Argument
Which of these takes attention away from the issue being discussed by shifting to something off topic?
slippery slope
red herring
hasty generalization
ad hominem
All men are mortal, and Socrates is a man, therefore Socrates likes dogs.
Ad Hominem
Hasty Generalization
Non Sequitur
Straw Man
Diverts attention from the original issue by shifting to another issue/topic
Hasty generalization
red herring
ad hominem/ personal attack
appeal to logos
What is a fallacy that presents information that does not follow logically from a premise
slippery slope
non sequitur
red herring
either / or
If you allow one student to take an online course, soon
everyone will want to, and the schools will be empty.
Slippery Slope
Band Wagon
Ambiguity
Insufficient Evidence
If you eat a good diet, you will never have a heart attack.
Misplaced cause and effect
Band Wagon
Ambiguity
Hasty Generalization
Only a selfish, non-caring person would believe that this is ok.
Ad Hominem
Band Wagon
Appeals to emotion
Slippery Slope
Everyone knows that teenagers are lazy
Ad Hominem
Band Wagon
Appeals to Emotion
Hasty Generalization
Everyone seems to support the changes in the vacation policy, and if everyone likes them, they must be
good.
Slippery Slope
Band Wagon
Misplaced Cause and Effect
Ambiguity
An error in reasoning
Falsehood
Rhetorical Devices
Logical Fallacies
Mistake
Using a personal experience or an isolated example instead of a sound argument or compelling evidence
Anecdote
Stereotypes
Loaded Language
Bandwagon Appeals
Words and phrases that elicit a strong emotional response from the reader or listener
Anecdote
Loaded Language
Circular Reasoning
Sweeping Generalizations
The assumption that the opinion of the majority is always valid: that is, everyone believes it, so you should too.
Loaded Language
Stereotypes
Bandwagon Appeals
Sweeping Generalizations
The reasoner begins with what they're trying to end with
Circular Reasoning
Bandwagon Appeals
Loaded Language
Anecdote
An argument that assumes the truth of what it is trying to prove.
hasty generalization
circular reasoning
straw man argument
ad hominem
An argument that appeals to popular opinion as the basis for its truth.
hasty generalization
circular reasoning
guilt by association
bandwagon fallacy
An interruption between the initial idea and the conclusion.
red herring
ad hominem
non sequitur
bandwagon fallacy
An argument based on a personal attack on someone's character.
appeal to nature
ad hominem
non sequitur
bandwagon fallacy
Substituting a person's actual position with a misrepresented (and usually weaker) version of their argument.
straw man argument
appeal to nature
non sequitur
guilt by association
Drawing a conclusion based on a small sample size; a broad claim based on limited evidence.
non sequitur
false causation
red herring
hasty generalization
An argument that misleads or distracts from a relevant or important issue.
straw man argument
false causation
red herring
hasty generalization
Jack is a good athlete. Jack comes from Canada. Therefore, all Canadians are good athletes."
red herring
ad hominem
non sequitur
bandwagon fallacy
"Four out of five dentists recommend Happy Glossy toothpaste. Therefore, it must be great."
non sequitur
false causation
red herring
hasty generalization
"Because everybody thinks this way, it must be right."
hasty generalization
circular reasoning
guilt by association
bandwagon fallacy
Which type of reasoning starts with specific observations and then draws a general conclusion?
Inductive reasoning
Abductive reasoning
Deductive reasoning
Analogical reasoning
What is deductive reasoning?
A method of reasoning that involves making generalizations based on specific observations.
A logical process to derive conclusions from premises or statements.
A process of reasoning that relies on intuition and personal beliefs.
A technique of reasoning that involves making conclusions based on emotions or feelings.
What is inductive reasoning?
Inductive reasoning is a type of logical reasoning that involves making generalizations or predictions based on specific observations or evidence.
Inductive reasoning is a type of emotional reasoning.
Inductive reasoning is a type of mathematical reasoning.
Inductive reasoning is a type of deductive reasoning.
What is an example of inductive reasoning?
Every dog I have seen has fur. Therefore, all dogs have fur.
Every bird I have seen can fly. Therefore, all birds can fly.
Every car I have seen has four wheels. Therefore, all cars have four wheels.
Every cat I have seen has fur. Therefore, all cats have fur.
What is an example of deductive reasoning?
All mammals have hair. A dog is a mammal. Therefore, a dog has hair.
All mammals have feathers. A dog is a mammal. Therefore, a dog has feathers.
All mammals have scales. A dog is a mammal. Therefore, a dog has scales.
All mammals have fins. A dog is a mammal. Therefore, a dog has fins.
A dental assistant notices a patient has never been on time for an appointment. She concludes that the patient will be late for her next appointment.
Abductive Reasoning
Deductive Reasonging
Inductive Reasoning
I heard scratching sounds coming from the ceiling and noticed there were droppings on the floor. I’m pretty sure we have a mice infestation at our house.
Abductive Reasoning
Deductive Reasoning
Inductive Reasoning
A person must have a membership to work out at a gym. Jesse is working out at a gym. Jesse has a membership to the gym.
Abductive Reasoning
Deductive Reasoning
Inductive Reasoning
This piece of evidence utilizes short stories to explain a situation.
Commonly Accepted Beliefs
Expert Opinion
Anecdote
Fact
What is deductive reasoning?
Drawing specific conclusions from general premises based on facts
Making generalizations based on specific observations or patterns
Making a probable conclusion from what you know
A kind of reasoning based on finding a common relational system between two situations
What is inductive reasoning?
Making a probable conclusion from what you know
Drawing specific conclusions from general premises
A kind of reasoning based on finding a common relational system between two situations
Making generalizations based on specific observations or patterns
What is abductive reasoning?
To abduce a logical assumption from an observation or set of observations and/or experiences
Drawing specific conclusions from general premises
A kind of reasoning based on finding a common relational system between two situations
Making generalizations based on specific observations or patterns
