Font size
Worksheets222 decision making
Total questions: 121
Worksheet time: 1hrs 3mins
If the premises of a deductive argument are true and the reasoning is valid, then:
The conclusion is probably true
The conclusion must be true
The conclusion may or may not be true
New information is always added
“All HELP Uni students graduate. Sarah is a HELP Uni student. Therefore, Sarah will graduate.” This is an example of:
Inductive reasoning
Analogy-based reasoning
Deductive reasoning
Hypothesis testing
What distinguishes propositional reasoning from syllogistic reasoning?
Only propositional reasoning uses quantifiers
Syllogistic reasoning is always inductive
Propositional reasoning focuses on connectives like "if-then"
Propositional reasoning never deals with truth values
Which of the following conclusions is INVALID under propositional logic? Premise: If Amy studies, then she will pass. Premise: Amy passed. Conclusion: Therefore, Amy studied.
Valid
Invalid
Unknown
Logically sound
In logic, "p ∧ q" is false when:
Both p and q are true
Either p or q is false
p is false, but q is true
Both B and C
Which is the correct truth table result for p → q when p is false and q is false?
True
False
Undefined
Cannot be determined
Which term best defines the logical validity of a syllogism?
Whether the conclusion is factual
Whether the premises are realistic
Whether the conclusion logically follows from the premises
Whether it uses “if-then” statements
Syllogistic reasoning requires that:
Premises must be believable
Premises must be emotionally impactful
Premises must be assumed true regardless of real-world facts
Premises must use "if...then..." logic
What is the main flaw in the syllogism: All birds are animals. All animals have four legs. Therefore, all birds have four legs.
It's inductive, not deductive
Premises are false
Conclusion doesn't follow logically
Belief bias invalidates the premises
Belief bias is:
A failure in hypothesis testing
A type of analogical error
Tendency to accept conclusions we agree with, regardless of logic
A result of using the availability heuristic
Which of the following statements about deductive reasoning is FALSE?
It guarantees truth if rules are followed
It always introduces new information
It begins with general premises
It includes syllogisms and propositional logic
Which syllogism is logically valid?
All cats are animals. All animals bark. Therefore, all cats bark.
All bachelors are men. Some men are tall. Therefore, some bachelors are tall.
All birds have wings. All eagles are birds. Therefore, all eagles have wings.
Some dogs bark. All barking creatures are scary. Therefore, all dogs are scary.
If p → q, which of the following is a valid inference?
p is true, q is false → Valid
p is false, q is true → Valid
p is true, q is true → Invalid
p is false, q is false → Invalid
Which error occurs when we wrongly assume that “If p → q” and “q is true,” then “p must be true”?
Affirming the consequent
Denying the antecedent
Confirmation bias
Counterfactual thinking
The conclusion "Some A are C" based on the premises "All A are B" and "Some B are C" is:
Always valid
Never valid
Sometimes valid
Invalid due to missing quantifier logic
The term for deductive validity is:
Accuracy
Logic strength
Necessary truth
Probability logic
What role do quantifiers play in syllogisms?
They determine emotional impact
They clarify truth tables
They define logical structure of premises
They provide analogical strength
Which of the following best explains why people accept invalid syllogisms?
Working memory overload
Low motivation
Believable conclusion bias
Simulation failure
Inductive reasoning differs from deductive reasoning in that it:
Moves from general to specific
Always produces true conclusions
Involves probable rather than certain conclusions
Doesn’t use premises
"Every dog I've met has barked. Therefore, all dogs bark." This is an example of:
Deductive syllogism
Analogical reasoning
Inductive generalization
Hypothesis testing
Which of the following is NOT a type of inductive reasoning?
Analogical reasoning
Hypothesis testing
Propositional reasoning
Generalization
Analogical reasoning relies heavily on:
Belief bias
Hypothesis testing
Deep knowledge of multiple domains
Memory heuristics
Which of these analogies depends most on a strong mental model?
A is to B as C is to D
Life is like a box of chocolates
Ducks are birds, and geese are too
Humans like pizza, and cats like fish
What cognitive structure helps with interpreting analogies?
Algorithms
Truth tables
Mental models
Heuristic systems
In hypothesis testing, which is always the goal of scientific reasoning?
Prove the hypothesis
Disprove the hypothesis
Collect supportive anecdotes
Find confirmation bias
The null hypothesis is best described as:
The predicted result
A rule we attempt to confirm
The rule we attempt to disprove
The metaphor used in analogical reasoning
Confirmation bias in hypothesis testing can lead to:
Improved accuracy
Increased objectivity
Selective search for supportive data
A stronger null hypothesis
Inductive strength refers to:
Certainty of outcome
Logical structure of premises
Likelihood that a conclusion is true
Number of hypotheses tested
In analogical reasoning, which of the following most improves accuracy?
Ignoring dissimilarities
Shallow similarities
Structural and relational similarity
Personal beliefs
Which reasoning example best shows confirmation bias?
Testing both supporting and contradicting cases
Selecting only data that matches your initial guess
Using a mental model for simulation
Generating multiple hypotheses
What’s the key difference between inductive reasoning and hypothesis testing?
One is deductive
One requires probabilistic tools
Hypothesis testing is structured, while induction is informal
Induction guarantees truth
“This restaurant has been empty every time I passed. It’s probably not good.” This is an example of:
Deductive inference
Counterfactual simulation
Inductive reasoning
Anchoring
Which reasoning process involves simulating possible outcomes based on past experience?
Deductive syllogism
Analogical reasoning
Simulation heuristic
Representativeness heuristic
Which is a common flaw in inductive reasoning?
Denying antecedents
Assuming necessary truth
Ignoring disconfirming evidence
All of the above
Analogical reasoning is especially strong when:
Situations are superficially similar
Personal experience confirms the analogy
Deep structural similarities exist
Inductive reasoning is impossible
What is the formula for Expected Utility (EU)?
EU = risk × value
EU = utility × outcome magnitude
EU = utility × probability
EU = preference – cost
According to EU theory, a rational decision-maker:
Selects the most probable outcome
Ignores the cost if the outcome is good
Maximizes subjective value multiplied by probability
Uses emotion to simulate outcomes
MAUT is superior to simple EU when:
There is only one attribute per option
Emotional factors dominate
Decisions involve multiple attributes
No probability estimates are available
In MAUT, the "utility weight" represents:
Objective score
Magnitude of benefit
Importance of the attribute
Estimated probability
What does MAUT help avoid in decision-making?
Emotions
Intuition
Oversimplification of multi-factor decisions
Simulation errors
A student is choosing between universities using MAUT. She lists tuition, location, faculty, and nightlife. What does she do n
A student is choosing between universities using MAUT. She lists tuition, location, faculty, and nightlife. What does she do next?
Assign each attribute a probability
Rank attributes by personal importance and rate each school
Choose the school with best reputation
Eliminate the worst option first
The biggest criticism of normative models like EU and MAUT is that:
They ignore logic
They require unrealistic cognitive effort
They account for too many variables
They can only be used with software
Which example demonstrates an irrational deviation from EU theory?
Choosing lower EU because of fear of loss
Assigning probabilities to each outcome
Calculating outcome magnitude
Weighing expected outcomes
Which of the following represents a MAUT calculation?
Choose the most probable option
Pick the one with the most extreme utility
Multiply weights and magnitudes, then sum across attributes
Compare emotional impact of losses
Which would NOT influence subjective utility in EU theory?
Risk aversion
Probability weighting
Mood
Number of alternatives
According to normative theory, good decisions are defined by:
Being the most popular
Having high emotional payoff
Maximizing calculated utility
Matching past successful choices
In MAUT, if a high-utility attribute has low magnitude, its overall contribution will be:
High
Low
Unaffected
Dependent on probability
When is using MAUT not appropriate?
When multiple criteria exist
When utility weights are unclear or unavailable
When outcomes are uncertain
When comparing universities
MAUT improves decision quality by:
Avoiding any trade-offs
Prioritizing probability
Quantifying and combining multiple considerations
Simulating emotional reactions
MAUT and EU are both based on which assumption?
Emotions distort decision-making
Humans act irrationally
Decisions should be logically and mathematically optimal
Experience is more reliable than calculation
What is a practical limitation of Expected Utility Theory?
Doesn’t handle large groups
Overestimates memory recall
Requires perfect knowledge of utilities and probabilities
Applies only to gamblers
You decide between two jobs using MAUT. Salary is 9/10 in importance, environment 7/10. Job A scores 10 on salary, 2 on environment. Job B scores 7 and 8 respectively. Which should you choose?
Job A
Job B
Both equal
Depends on emotions
Which model best fits the description “ideal decision under perfect information”?
Heuristic model
Normative model
Descriptive model
Simulation model
Compared to descriptive models, normative models are:
More emotionally reactive
Less dependent on logic
More prescriptive and optimal
More time-efficient
Which real-life scenario best demonstrates the limitations of normative decision models?
Choosing which pen to buy
Emergency evacuation from a fire
Calculating taxes using Excel
Choosing between equally priced items
Descriptive decision models focus on:
How people should make decisions
How people actually make decisions
Logically valid conclusions
Simulated outcomes only
Which of the following is not a stage in the decision-making process?
Cue reception
Hypothesis generation
Heuristic distortion
Action selection
What typically initiates hypothesis generation in decision-making?
Final decisions
Random guesses
Cues perceived from the environment
Action outcomes
In the decision-making stage “cue reception,” a person is primarily:
Choosing between options
Gathering and integrating perceptual information
Assigning utility values
Comparing hypotheses
A doctor tentatively selects a diagnosis based on symptoms, but waits for test results before finalizing it. This best reflects:
Hypothesis generation
Hypothesis evaluation
Action selection
Cue integration
Action generation involves:
Perceiving new cues
Testing mental models
Retrieving potential responses from long-term memory
Simulating emotions
Which factor most likely affects retrieval of relevant knowledge from long-term memory?
Working memory capacity
Base rate fallacy
Expertise and experience
Availability heuristic
Descriptive models differ from normative models in that descriptive models:
Require utility calculations
Include all attributes
Explain suboptimal or biased decisions
Focus on economic value
Which example reflects descriptive decision-making?
Using a decision matrix
Flipping a coin
Choosing a cheaper item due to habit
Calculating expected utility
A student ignores a scholarship application because the process seems too long. This reflects:
Normative optimization
Cue integration error
Heuristic efficiency
Performance limitation
Time pressure affects decision-making by:
Improving accuracy
Encouraging detailed analysis
Forcing reliance on heuristics
Eliminating the need for cue integration
What is the primary reason people use simplifying heuristics according to descriptive models?
Heuristics are always rational
Time, memory, and resource limitations
Perfect information is always available
Emotions are absent in real decisions
Which stage of decision-making most clearly requires working memory to evaluate multiple competing ideas?
Cue reception
Hypothesis generation
Action selection
Hypothesis evaluation
An emergency situation with limited time and high stress will most likely cause decision-makers to:
Use expected utility theory
Apply MAUT
Default to System 1 (intuitive) thinking
Recalculate action probabilities
The major difference between normative and descriptive approaches is:
Normative models ignore logic
Descriptive models require MAUT
Normative = “should,” Descriptive = “do”
Descriptive models guarantee optimality
Heuristics are best described as:
Emotion-based strategies
Random guesses
Mental shortcuts or rules of thumb
Long-form mathematical equations
The availability heuristic leads people to judge events as more likely if:
They are supported by statistics
They can be easily recalled from memory
They are unfamiliar
They involve high emotional cost
Which scenario best illustrates the availability heuristic?
Buying a lottery ticket after watching someone win
Calculating the exact odds of an outcome
Using cost-benefit analysis to compare products
Searching reviews for the best option
Simulation heuristic is distinct from availability heuristic in that it:
Is based on logic
Involves mental construction of possible outcomes
Uses long-term memory
Ignores emotional reactions
A student thinks, “If I had studied last weekend, I would’ve done better.” This is:
Representativeness heuristic
Counterfactual thinking
Anchoring
Framing effect
The representativeness heuristic can cause base rate neglect when:
We simulate possible regrets
We ignore statistical frequency in favor of stereotypes
We lack information on probabilities
The task is emotionally charged
In the classic “Jack the engineer” experiment, people ignored:
Jack’s emotional profile
Probability distribution (base rates)
Outcome consequences
Utility calculations
Representativeness heuristic may cause misjudgment because:
People rely only on memory
People match patterns to prior knowledge, ignoring actual probabilities
People overvalue future gains
It focuses too much on magnitude
"Fast and frugal heuristics" are considered:
Inefficient and biased
Suboptimal compared to MAUT
Adaptive and often successful
Only used by novices
According to Gigerenzer, heuristics are effective because:
They reduce emotional intensity
They require base rate calculations
They exploit reliable environmental cues quickly
They eliminate subjectivity
The recognition heuristic states:
Choose what’s most familiar if you lack deeper knowledge
Ignore unrecognizable options
Trust your instincts over all else
Seek complete information
Experts often use recognition-primed decision-making because:
They simulate every possible outcome
Their cue-pattern associations are automated
They eliminate uncertainty
They use MAUT faster
“Satisficing” means:
Searching for the perfect choice
Avoiding any decision
Settling for the first acceptable option
Minimizing regret
Which of the following heuristics is least likely to involve deep comparison of options?
Multi-attribute utility
Recognition heuristic
Simulation heuristic
Representativeness heuristic
A person who says, “This place has okay reviews — it'll do,” is likely using:
Counterfactual reasoning
Satisficing
Simulation
Anchoring
Which statement is true about heuristics?
They are irrational
They always lead to errors
They can be efficient and effective
They require full data
Simulation heuristic is most likely to be used when:
You are comparing many attributes
You need to make an emotional choice
You are predicting consequences of actions
You know the base rate
Representativeness heuristic can lead to:
Accurate logical deductions
Improved emotional awareness
Ignoring prior probability
Stronger simulation
Which of the following best explains why heuristics are so widely used?
They always give accurate answers
They are part of formal reasoning models
They are fast, resource-efficient, and good enough
They are emotionally satisfying
Who is most likely to rely on recognition heuristics?
Expert mathematician
Person with no prior exposure to the topic
Someone comparing probabilities
Person calculating expected utility
Illusory correlation refers to:
Judging randomness by frequency
Believing there's a relationship between unrelated variables
Believing in base rates
Simulating alternative outcomes
What best explains why people believe “every time I wear my lucky socks, we win”?
Anchoring
Simulation heuristic
Illusory correlation
Framing effect
Anchoring bias involves:
Rejecting extreme options
Overreliance on an initial reference point
Underestimating future impact
Emotional bias in utility
Which of the following best shows anchoring?
Estimating a population based on the first number you're shown
Avoiding decisions due to uncertainty
Remembering only recent experiences
Generalizing based on stereotypes
Framing effect causes preference shifts due to:
Different numbers of options
Way options are worded
Base rate errors
Incomplete hypothesis evaluation
People are more likely to choose a surgery if told “98% survival rate” than if told “2% mortality rate.” This illustrates:
Satisficing
Anchoring
Framing
Confirmation bias
The sunk cost fallacy is best described as:
Investing more in a failing situation because of past investment
Anchoring to previous outcomes
Avoiding better options to reduce guilt
Choosing emotionally satisfying results
A person keeps reading a boring book just because they’ve already read half of it. This is an example of:
Framing
Confirmation bias
Sunk cost effect
Simulation heuristic
Which illusion is based on post-hoc memory distortion?
Anchoring
Hindsight bias
Availability heuristic
Framing
"I knew this would happen!" is a classic sign of:
Simulation heuristic
Confirmation bias
Hindsight bias
Representativeness
Confirmation bias involves:
Ignoring plausible hypotheses
Searching only for evidence that supports a belief
Simulating unlikely outcomes
Framing options negatively
Overconfidence occurs when:
People assume the worst outcome
People underestimate task difficulty
People's confidence exceeds their actual accuracy
People simulate too many possibilities
Which of the following reduces the influence of cognitive illusions?
Stress
More options
Awareness of bias
Increased emotional salience
You believe a person is lazy based solely on them being late once. This could be due to:
Representativeness heuristic
Simulation error
Fundamental attribution error / correspondence bias
Overconfidence
Which of the following most accurately links an illusion to a heuristic?
Illusory correlation → availability
Sunk cost → MAUT
Framing → hypothesis testing
Overconfidence → anchoring
Loss aversion means:
People avoid gains
Losses feel worse than gains feel good
People never take risks
Losses are rationalized away
According to research, how does experiencing a loss compare to imagining one?
Experience feels worse
Forecasters predict lower distress
People overestimate the emotional impact of imagined losses
They are identical
Loss aversion is most closely linked with:
Simulation heuristic
Hindsight bias
Anchoring
Expected utility
Someone refuses to leave a toxic relationship because of years already spent in it. This reflects:
Loss aversion
Framing
Satisficing
Simulation
Emotional reactions are most likely to interfere with decision-making when:
Time is abundant
Choices are abstract
Outcomes involve personal consequences
All information is objective
What effect does high neuroticism have on sunk cost decisions?
Decreases bias
Increases willingness to abandon sunk costs
Increases susceptibility to remain invested
Has no effect
High anxiety increases:
Rationality
Emotional detachment
Loss aversion
Cue integration
People are more likely to avoid action that could cause harm, even if inaction is riskier. This is called:
Loss aversion
Decision fatigue
Omission bias
Representativeness
In Ritov & Baron’s study, why did parents avoid vaccinating their child, even when vaccine risk was lower?
Framing bias
Omission bias: they feared being responsible for harm caused by action
Confirmation bias
Illusory correlation
What bias explains the tendency to feel more regret over actions than inactions?
Sunk cost effect
Anchoring
Omission bias
Availability heuristic
Emotional regulation may improve decision-making by:
Amplifying loss aversion
Encouraging fast and frugal heuristics
Reducing influence of biases
Ignoring past experience
Which of these is most likely to be influenced by an emotional forecast?
Utility weighting
Simulation heuristic
Cue perception
Syllogistic logic
Emotional reasoning may conflict with normative logic when:
Probabilities are well-known
Losses are expected
Choices are emotionally charged
Outcomes are trivial
What impact does anticipating regret have on decisions?
Encourages more accurate outcomes
Encourages inaction and conservative choices
Decreases utility calculations
Increases hypothesis testing
In emotional decision contexts, what might override rational choice models?
Logical consistency
Belief bias
Anticipated feelings
Base rate data
