Font size
WorksheetsI/O PSYCHOLOGY CH1-2 PART 1
Total questions: 113
Worksheet time: 57mins
A branch of psychology that applies the principles of psychology to the workplace.
Industrial/Organizational Psychology
Organizational Psychology
Industrial Psychology
--- psychologists are able to apply psychological theories to explain and enhance the effectiveness of human behaviour in the workplace.
Industrial/Organizational Psychology
Organizational Psychology
Industrial Psychology
psychologists “enhance the dignity and performance of human beings, and the organizations they work in, by advancing the science and knowledge of human behavior.
Industrial/Organizational Psychology
Organizational Psychology
Industrial Psychology
Focuses on determining the competencies needed to be to perform a job, staffing the organization with competent employees and boosting the competencies through learning and development.
Industrial/Organizational Psychology
Organizational Psychology
Industrial Psychology
Testing and selection focus.
Industrial/Organizational Psychology
Organizational Psychology
Industrial Psychology
Focuses on organizational structure and culture.
Industrial/Organizational Psychology
Organizational Psychology
Industrial Psychology
Attitudinal and social focus.
Industrial/Organizational Psychology
Organizational Psychology
Industrial Psychology
Deals with analyzing jobs, recruiting applicants, selecting employees, determining salary levels, training employees, and evaluating employee performance.
Personnel Psychology
Organizational Pyschology
Human Factors/Ergonomics
I/O Psychology
Human Resource Management
Focuses on the issues of leadership, job satisfaction, employee motivation, organizational communication, conflict management, organization change and group processes within the organisation.
Personnel Psychology
Organizational Pyschology
Human Factors/Ergonomics
I/O Psychology
Human Resource Management
Focuses on workplace design, human machine interaction, ergonomics, and physical fatigue and stress.
Personnel Psychology
Organizational Pyschology
Human Factors/Ergonomics
I/O Psychology
Human Resource Management
Focuses on human behavior in the workplace.
Personnel Psychology
Organizational Pyschology
Human Factors/Ergonomics
I/O Psychology
Human Resource Management
Conducting research better understands the relationship between employee happiness and organizational efficiency.
Personnel Psychology
Organizational Pyschology
Human Factors/Ergonomics
I/O Psychology
Human Resource Management
Focuses on affairs like recruitment, compensation, and benefits administration.
Personnel Psychology
Organizational Pyschology
Human Factors/Ergonomics
I/O Psychology
Human Resource Management
Improving employee-employer relations and workplace health by maintaining company culture, performing administrative tasks and implementing already-developed programming.
Personnel Psychology
Organizational Pyschology
Human Factors/Ergonomics
I/O Psychology
Human Resource Management
Early Beginnings:
Walter Dill Scott publishes The Theory of Advertising
1903
1913
1917
Early Beginnings:
Hugo Munsterberg publishes Psychology and Industrial Efficiency
1903
1913
1917
Early Beginnings:
Journal of Applied Psychology first published
1903
1913
1917
World War (1914-1921):
literate
Army Alpha
Army Beta
John Watson
Henry Gatt
World War (1914-1921):
illiterate but with abstract reasoning.
Army Alpha
Army Beta
John Watson
Henry Gatt
World War (1914-1921):
developed tests for pilots (perceptual and motor tests)
Army Alpha
Army Beta
John Watson
Henry Gatt
World War (1914-1921):
increased cargo ship efficiency
Army Alpha
Army Beta
John Watson
Henry Gatt
1920-1940
Inventor Thomas Edison crafted 163 items knowledge tests that he admitted to 900 applicants.
1920
1921
1932
1933
1937
1920-1940
First Ph.D. in I/O Psychology awarded to Bruce Moore and Merrill Ream at Carnegie Tech
1920
1921
1932
1933
1937
1920-1940
First I/O text book written by Morris Viteles
1920
1921
1932
1933
1937
1920-1940
Hawthorne Studies published (employees are more productive if someone is observing)
1920
1921
1932
1933
1937
1920-1940
American Association for Applied Psychology Established
1920
1921
1932
1933
1937
Derives from a curiosity and usually starts with a sentence “I wonder..”
idea
hypothesis
theory
An educated prediction about the answer to a research problem (What will happen?)
idea
hypothesis
theory
A systemic set of assumptions regarding the cause and nature of behavior (Why will it happen?)
idea
hypothesis
theory
An educated prediction about the answer to a research problem (What will happen?)
idea
hypothesis
theory
An educated prediction about the answer to a research problem (What will happen?)
idea
hypothesis
theory
Concentrates on the formal structure of the organisation and leaves the human aspect of the organization to the personnel specialist.
Classical Theories
Neo-classical Theory
Modern Theory
Contingency Theories
Also known as Human Relations Theory
Classical Theories
Neo-classical Theory
Modern Theory
Contingency Theories
Begin in 1940s
Classical Theories
Neo-classical Theory
Modern Theory
Contingency Theories
Response to the Classical Theories, which created a dehumanized workplace that vastly underutilised the creativity and initiative of employees.
Classical Theories
Neo-classical Theory
Modern Theory
Contingency Theories
Give emphasis to “affective and socio-psychological aspects of human behaviour in organization”
Classical Theories
Neo-classical Theory
Modern Theory
Contingency Theories
Concentrates on topics such as morale, leadership, and mainly factors that aid in the cooperation in organizational behavior.
Classical Theories
Neo-classical Theory
Modern Theory
Contingency Theories
Employees’ behavior should be taken into consideration when designing organization structure.
Classical Theories
Neo-classical Theory
Modern Theory
Contingency Theories
Managers not only think of job descriptions, they also think of why people behave as they do and what influences their behavior.
Classical Theories
Neo-classical Theory
Modern Theory
Contingency Theories
The organization is composed of individuals with different needs that can be studied and a group of people who developed their own ways of doing things and their own code of conduct.
Classical Theories
Neo-classical Theory
Modern Theory
Contingency Theories
Workers should be motivated and encouraged to boost active participation in the production process.
Classical Theories
Neo-classical Theory
Modern Theory
Contingency Theories
The feelings and sentiments of the workers should be taken into account and respected before any change is introduced in the organization.
Classical Theories
Neo-classical Theory
Modern Theory
Contingency Theories
The emphasis is on a structural framework in which grouped activities are assigned to people, authority relations are established, individual efforts are properly coordinated and responsibilities are fixed.
Classical Theories
Neo-classical Theory
Modern Theory
Contingency Theories
Divides the tasks to be done.
How the group tasks together into departments.
How to deal with the problems of coordination.
Classical Theories
Neo-classical Theory
Modern Theory
Contingency Theories
The emphasis is on a structural framework in which grouped activities are assigned to people, authority relations are established, individual efforts are properly coordinated and responsibilities are fixed.
Classical Theories
Neo-classical Theory
Modern Theory
Contingency Theories
Static approach, meaning too little too much attention to the many interactions that take place between different parts of the organization.
Classical Theories
Neo-classical Theory
Modern Theory
Contingency Theories
Most managers' time is allotted in coordination and control of the subordinates.
Classical Theories
Neo-classical Theory
Modern Theory
Contingency Theories
Too concerned with formal structure, not sufficient with the individuals who make the structure work.
Classical Theories
Neo-classical Theory
Modern Theory
Contingency Theories
Most managers' time is allotted in coordination and control of the subordinates.
Classical Theories
Neo-classical Theory
Modern Theory
Contingency Theories
Stressed the need for a clear definition of responsibilities and authority.
Classical Theories
Neo-classical Theory
Modern Theory
Contingency Theories
Introduced by Frederick Winslow Taylor
Scientific Management Theory
Bureaucratic (Ideal Bureaucracy)
Administrative Management
Aims to encourage production efficiency and productivity through management of production as science.
Scientific Management Theory
Bureaucratic (Ideal Bureaucracy)
Administrative Management
Focuses on job performance only.
Scientific Management Theory
Bureaucratic (Ideal Bureaucracy)
Administrative Management
Creation of a scientific method of measurement that replaces the “rule-of-thumb” method.
Scientific Management Theory
Bureaucratic (Ideal Bureaucracy)
Administrative Management
Emphasis on training of workers by management.
Scientific Management Theory
Bureaucratic (Ideal Bureaucracy)
Administrative Management
Cooperation between manager and workers to ensure principles are met.
Scientific Management Theory
Bureaucratic (Ideal Bureaucracy)
Administrative Management
Equal division by labor between managers and workers.
Scientific Management Theory
Bureaucratic (Ideal Bureaucracy)
Administrative Management
Job Classification and clustering of jobs.
Scientific Management Theory
Bureaucratic (Ideal Bureaucracy)
Administrative Management
Presence of impersonal positions that are earned and not inherited, rule governed decision making, professionalism, chain of common, defined responsibility, and bounded authority
Scientific Management Theory
Bureaucratic (Ideal Bureaucracy)
Administrative Management
Max Weber
Scientific Management Theory
Bureaucratic (Ideal Bureaucracy)
Administrative Management
Systems of rules and regulations
Scientific Management Theory
Bureaucratic (Ideal Bureaucracy)
Administrative Management
Max Weber
Scientific Management Theory
Bureaucratic (Ideal Bureaucracy)
Administrative Management
Authority structure: bureaucratic institutions are characterized by very narrow spans of control.
Scientific Management Theory
Bureaucratic (Ideal Bureaucracy)
Administrative Management
Impersonal relations: reward should be based on one’s contribution to the organizations, as opposed to social and familial connections.
Scientific Management Theory
Bureaucratic (Ideal Bureaucracy)
Administrative Management
Line of hierarchy: ideally have one (and only one) direct supervisor.
Scientific Management Theory
Bureaucratic (Ideal Bureaucracy)
Administrative Management
Rationality: unity of direction.
Scientific Management Theory
Bureaucratic (Ideal Bureaucracy)
Administrative Management
Designed to assist managers in carrying out their essential functions of planning, organizing, commanding, coordination, and controlling.
Scientific Management Theory
Bureaucratic (Ideal Bureaucracy)
Administrative Management
Henri Fayol
Scientific Management Theory
Bureaucratic (Ideal Bureaucracy)
Administrative Management
Stability of personnel
Scientific Management Theory
Bureaucratic (Ideal Bureaucracy)
Administrative Management
Encouraging people to take initiative
Scientific Management Theory
Bureaucratic (Ideal Bureaucracy)
Administrative Management
Having a high level of cohesion and camaraderie among employees.
Scientific Management Theory
Bureaucratic (Ideal Bureaucracy)
Administrative Management
Fayol’s Classic Principles of Organizing
individuals and managers work on the same part or task.
Division of work
Authority and responsibility
Discipline
Unity of command
Unity of direction
Fayol’s Classic Principles of Organizing
Authority:right to give orders; power to exact obedience; goes with responsibility for reward and punishment.
Division of work
Authority and responsibility
Discipline
Unity of command
Unity of direction
Fayol’s Classic Principles of Organizing
obedience, application, energy, behavior. Agreement between firm and individual.
Division of work
Authority and responsibility
Discipline
Unity of command
Unity of direction
Fayol’s Classic Principles of Organizing
orders received from one supervisor.
Division of work
Authority and responsibility
Discipline
Unity of command
Unity of direction
Fayol’s Classic Principles of Organizing
one head and one plan for activities with the same objective.
Division of work
Authority and responsibility
Discipline
Unity of command
Unity of direction
organizational objectives come before the objectives of the individual.
Subordination of individual interest to general interest
Resurrection of personnel
Centralization
Scalar Chain
Order
fairness of pay to the organization and the individual; discussed various forms.
Subordination of individual interest to general interest
Resurrection of personnel
Centralization
Scalar Chain
Order
Amount of discretion held by the manager compared to that allowed to subordinates.
Subordination of individual interest to general interest
Resurrection of personnel
Centralization
Scalar Chain
Order
Line of authority from lowest to up.
Subordination of individual interest to general interest
Resurrection of personnel
Centralization
Scalar Chain
Order
A place for everyone, and everyone in his or her place.
Subordination of individual interest to general interest
Resurrection of personnel
Centralization
Scalar Chain
Order
Emphasis on kindness and justice.
Equity
Stability of tenure of personnel
Initiative
Esprit de corps
ability in managerial ranges; time to adapt to work.
Equity
Stability of tenure of personnel
Initiative
Esprit de corps
power of thinking out and executing a plan.
Equity
Stability of tenure of personnel
Initiative
Esprit de corps
Harmony and union among personnel is strength.
Equity
Stability of tenure of personnel
Initiative
Esprit de corps
Douglas McGregor
Theory X/Y Leadership
Theory X
Theory Y
Likert’s Concept of Human Organization
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
Assume that most people inherently dislike work.
Theory X/Y Leadership
Theory X
Theory Y
Likert’s Concept of Human Organization
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
Needed to be coerced and supervised very closely in terms of work.
Theory X/Y Leadership
Theory X
Theory Y
Likert’s Concept of Human Organization
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
People have little ambition and are not self-directed and value security over all else.
Theory X/Y Leadership
Theory X
Theory Y
Likert’s Concept of Human Organization
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
Very narrow spans of control.
Theory X/Y Leadership
Theory X
Theory Y
Likert’s Concept of Human Organization
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
Work is a natural part of peoples’ lives and rather than avoid it, most people seek greater meaning to it.
Theory X/Y Leadership
Theory X
Theory Y
Likert’s Concept of Human Organization
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
People are capable of some degree of self-control and will work towards the goal of the organisation.
Theory X/Y Leadership
Theory X
Theory Y
Likert’s Concept of Human Organization
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
Many people will seek out responsibility and will creatively solve organization problems if they are allowed to do so, under the right conditions.
Theory X/Y Leadership
Theory X
Theory Y
Likert’s Concept of Human Organization
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
Rensis Likert
Theory X/Y Leadership
Theory X
Theory Y
Likert’s Concept of Human Organization
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
Similar to Theory X.
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
Benevolent Authorative Type
Consultative
Participative
System 5
Very little trust, scant communication, very centralized decision making.
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
Benevolent Authorative Type
Consultative
Participative
System 5
Would result in largely dissatisfied employees and, ultimately, a low level of organizational performance.
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
Benevolent Authorative Type
Consultative
Participative
System 5
There is some level of trust in employees.
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
Benevolent Authorative Type
Consultative
Participative
System 5
Employees have an opportunity to communicate their ideas to upper management.
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
Benevolent Authorative Type
Consultative
Participative
System 5
May derive some moderate level of satisfaction toward their work, and organizational performance may be “fair to good”.
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
Benevolent Authorative Type
Consultative
Participative
System 5
Employees are still treated in a largely authoritative manner, but a bit nicer to them.
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
Benevolent Authorative Type
Consultative
Participative
System 5
Substantially greater trust in employees and their ideas are used a great deal more.
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
Benevolent Authorative Type
Consultative
Participative
System 5
Employees are still treated in a largely authoritative manner, but a bit nicer to them.
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
Benevolent Authorative Type
Consultative
Participative
System 5
More “bottoms-up” communication compared to other types.
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
Benevolent Authorative Type
Consultative
Participative
System 5
Decisions are still primarily in the hands of those at the higher positions, but operational decisions are made by those at lower organizational levels.
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
Benevolent Authorative Type
Consultative
Participative
System 5
Capable of “good” performance.
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
Benevolent Authorative Type
Consultative
Participative
System 5
Managers have complete trust in subordinates.
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
Benevolent Authorative Type
Consultative
Participative
System 5
Communication is free flowing in all directions, and there is often great reliance on teamwork.
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
Benevolent Authorative Type
Consultative
Participative
System 5
Decision-making occurs at all organizational levels with a high level of involvement.
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
Benevolent Authorative Type
Consultative
Participative
System 5
Capable of “excellent” performance.
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
Benevolent Authorative Type
Consultative
Participative
System 5
Proposed by J.G. Likers and Akari
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
Benevolent Authorative Type
Consultative
Participative
System 5
Essential identical with Participative Group Type but leadership is truly a shared enterprise or “no boss”
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
Benevolent Authorative Type
Consultative
Participative
System 5
Rare but may eventually become more prevalent.
Exploitative Authoritarian Type
Benevolent Authorative Type
Consultative
Participative
System 5
