During a group project, one member insists on doing things based on their cultural way, which clashes with the rest. What should the group aim for?

A student refuses to attend a class ritual because it conflicts with their personal beliefs. This shows tension between:

Your parents prefer a staycation during vacation, while you want to join your friends on a trip. This is similar to:

When classmates debate whether cheating is wrong even if “everyone does it,” the issue highlights:

A professor asks students to accept diverse views on an ethical issue. This promotes:

A student is pressured by peers to join an initiation rite, but he feels it is unsafe. The ethical conflict involves:

In a debate on same-sex marriage, some students use religious arguments while others use legal rights. The conflict shows:

Your parents insist you follow their curfew, but you argue college demands more freedom. This reflects:

A student reports cyberbullying happening in their class group chat. This act demonstrates:

Two classmates argue whether social media is more harmful or helpful. Their disagreement is an example of:

If students ignore cheating because it’s “part of culture,” what danger are they facing?

A group of friends cannot agree on where to eat because of different food preferences. The best ethical action is:

Your professor reminds the class to think critically before sharing online posts. This promotes:

When you disagree with your parent’s view on your major but still respect them, you are practicing:

A student accepts classmates’ differing religious practices without forcing their own. This is:

When students only memorize right vs wrong without context, what’s missing?

A family disagrees on whether to spend vacation in Baguio, a beach, or at home. This mirrors:

When a student weighs personal happiness against family expectations, this involves:

If one culture believes cremation is respectful, while another believes it is offensive, this is an example of:

In class discussions on ethics, why is it important to consider other cultures?

A student resists copying homework despite peers saying it’s “normal.” What does this show?

When parents and children argue about weekend activities, what ethical skill is most helpful?

Why can cultural diversity sometimes cause difficulty in decision-making?

If classmates accept all cultural practices without critique, what risk emerges?

When a farmer thinks differently from a teacher, MacIntyre would say this is because of:

If students learn ethics only through memorization, MacIntyre warns it leads to:

If one culture values individual rights above all, while another values community unity, what arises?

Your professor emphasizes that culture shapes your values and decisions. What does this imply?

When classmates argue about the morality of online games, their views reflect:

If students treat diversity as a problem, what do they fail to see?

A student values individual success while classmates value group harmony. What conflict is present?

If cultural norms always dominate decision-making, what problem arises?

A family debate on vacation plans resembles ethical conflicts because:

If students stop questioning unfair traditions, the danger is:

Which best captures the chapter’s claim about science and ethics? Analogy: Choosing study methods (what works) vs choosing what’s fair.

Frankenstein in the chapter is used to illustrate: Analogy: Copying answers and regretting it later.

Scientism is defined as: Analogy: Thinking only grades matter, nothing else does.

Why did opponents object to some stem cell research? Analogy: Throwing away a class project that might have potential.

The chapter’s use of Oppenheimer emphasizes: Analogy: Feeling guilty after doing harm even if initially justified.

According to the chapter, a value-free science means: Analogy: Studying only to pass without regard to learning.

Stem cell uses beyond curing (e.g., aesthetics) raise which issue? Analogy: Using extra-curricular resources only for status.

Einstein’s quoted concern suggests: Analogy: Stopping fights rather than preparing for them.

The blastocyst is described as: Analogy: A seed that could become a plant.

Which best reflects the chapter’s stance on regulating science? Analogy: Classroom rules that keep projects safe.

A plausible ethical worry about cloning for stem cells is: Analogy: Copying classmates’ work repeatedly.

What tension does the chapter highlight? Analogy: Wanting top grades vs keeping friendships.

Which example is used to illustrate ethical costs of science? Analogy: Winning a competition by cheating.

The chapter suggests ethicists and scientists should: Analogy: Work on a group project with clear roles.

What role does “humane commitment” play in science? Analogy: Choosing group fairness over individual win.

“Value-free science” critics would argue: Analogy: Ignoring class rules because you’re smart.

Which is a therapeutic promise of stem cells mentioned? Analogy: Repairing a broken gadget with spare parts.

When the chapter says science should be “encouraged,” it also says: Analogy: Letting lab time happen but with safety rules.

Critics who equate embryos to persons argue primarily from: Analogy: Treating a saved project as fully yours already.

The chapter claims scientism leads to: Analogy: Believing test scores are the only measure of worth.

Which best describes stem cell grafting as explained? Analogy: Planting a cutting to replace a rotten branch.

The chapter’s view of scientists who avoid ethics entirely is that they: Analogy: Doing a lab report but skipping conclusions.

Which best reflects the “instrumental function” of science? Analogy: A tool used to build a project.

The chapter suggests ethical debate around stem cells will: Analogy: A long group discussion about fairness.

Which is NOT a reason some choose stem cell therapy (per chapter)? Analogy: Choosing extra credit only for reputation.

The chapter implies who should care about ethics in science? Analogy: Everyone in a dorm must follow fire rules.

According to the chapter, what can happen when ethics is ignored? Analogy: Skipping proofreading leads to embarrassing mistakes.

The phrase “playing God” in the chapter refers to: Analogy: Changing others’ schedules without consent.

How does the chapter portray “value” in science? Analogy: Rubrics that grade projects vs personal motives.

The chapter’s main recommendation is: Analogy: Study hard but don’t cheat.

Which is an immediate ethical question about stem cell clinics? Analogy: Tutors charging high fees for easy answers.

The chapter says the destruction of a blastocyst is considered by some as: Analogy: Throwing away an unfinished group project.

Which historical figure in the chapter expressed remorse? Analogy: Feeling bad after skipping a critical class.

What does the chapter suggest about science as an “end in itself”? Analogy: Studying only for praise, not learning.

Which best describes proponents’ rebuttal about stem cell sourcing? Analogy: Showing an alternate route to get to school.