wayground logo

Free Printable Worksheets

Font size

S
M
L
XL
Worksheets

Deep Foundations: Pile Capacity Analysis

Total questions: 7

Worksheet time: 4mins

Name
Class
Date
1.

The ultimate axial capacity of a single pile is generally expressed as:

a)

Qu = Qp only

b)

Qu = Qs only

c)

Qu = Qp + Qs

d)

Qu = Qp – Qs

2.

For downward axial loading, side (skin) friction along a pile shaft is typically fully mobilized at a relative pile–soil displacement on the order of:

a)

A. 0.5–1% of pile diameter

b)

B. 5–10 mm (driven 5 mm; bored ~10 mm)

c)

C. 10–25% of pile diameter

d)

D. 50–100 mm regardless of pile type

3.

For point (end-bearing) resistance under downward load, full mobilization usually requires tip movement approximately:

a)

0.5–1% of pile diameter

b)

2–3% of pile diameter

c)

10–25% of pile diameter

d)

Equal to the embedment length

4.

In sands (c' = 0), Meyerhof’s approach for pile point resistance in terms of effective overburden typically uses:

a)

qp = q' Nq* up to a limiting value ql

b)

qp = 9 cu

c)

qp = su Nc (Nc = 5.14)

d)

qp = γ' B Nγ

5.

In saturated clays under undrained conditions (φ = 0), the commonly used expression for pile point resistance is:

a)

Qp = Ap q' Nq*

b)

Qp = 0.5 γ B Nγ Ap

c)

Qp = 9 cu Ap

d)

Qp = 0.4 pa N60 Ap

6.

Coyle and Castello’s method for Qp in sand correlates Qp primarily with:

a)

Undrained shear strength cu

b)

Unit shaft friction profile along the pile

c)

Effective overburden and an Nq* factor that depends on L/D and φ'

d)

Elastic modulus of pile material

7.

A practical upper bound (critical embedment ratio) for developing maximum point resistance in sands is often taken around:

a)

L/D ≈ 4–8

b)

L/D ≈ 8–20 (often ~15–20 depending on method)

c)

L/D ≈ 1–2

d)

L/D has no influence on qp