12 Angry Men Act 2 Flashcard

Front

What evidence is presented in Act 2 that challenges the guilt of the defendant?

Back

Testimony of a witness and new information casting doubt on initial eyewitness accounts.

Front

What piece of evidence was brought into the room during Act II?

Back

A diagram.

Front

Why does Juror 9 suggest the old man may have lied in his testimony?

Back

He relates to the old man and feels that maybe the old man feels important for the first time in a long while.

Front

What is the main conflict in Act 2 of 12 Angry Men?

Back

Disagreement among the jurors.

Front

How does the character of Juror 3 evolve in Act 2 and what triggers this change?

Back

Juror 3 evolves from being aggressive and stubborn to being outwardly ready to fight anyone who disagrees.

Front

What role does the character of Juror 8 play in Act 2?

Back

Juror 8 serves as the voice of reason, advocating for a fair discussion and encouraging others to reconsider their positions.

Front

How does the setting of the jury room influence the dynamics among the jurors?

Back

The confined space of the jury room creates tension and forces jurors to confront each other's opinions directly.

Front

What is the significance of the knife evidence in the trial?

Back

The knife serves as a critical piece of evidence that is re-examined to question the reliability of the prosecution's case.

Front

How does the theme of reasonable doubt manifest in Act 2?

Back

Jurors begin to express uncertainty about the evidence presented, highlighting the importance of reasonable doubt in the justice system.

Front

What impact does Juror 4's logical reasoning have on the group?

Back

Juror 4's logical approach helps to sway some jurors to reconsider their initial verdicts.