12 Angry Men Act 2

Front

What is the significance of Juror Five's background in the play?

Back

Juror Five's background in the slums influences his perspective on the case, as he empathizes with the accused boy's situation and challenges the biases of other jurors.

Front

What does the phrase 'I'm gonna kill you!' imply in the context of the play?

Back

The jurors discuss that such phrases are often said in anger without intent to kill, highlighting the importance of context in interpreting statements.

Front

What does Juror Eight question about the old man's testimony?

Back

Juror Eight questions the old man's ability to move quickly from his bedroom to the door, suggesting that his testimony may not be reliable.

Front

How does Juror Eight demonstrate the old man's testimony?

Back

Juror Eight acts out the old man's movements to illustrate the implausibility of his account, emphasizing the need for critical examination of evidence.

Front

What is a cliffhanger in the context of a play?

Back

A cliffhanger is a dramatic ending that leaves the audience in suspense, often used to build tension and anticipation for what happens next.

Front

How do secret ballots function in the jury deliberation process?

Back

Secret ballots allow jurors to vote anonymously, reducing peer pressure and encouraging honest opinions about the case.

Front

What role does empathy play in Juror Eight's arguments?

Back

Empathy is central to Juror Eight's arguments as he seeks to understand the accused boy's circumstances and advocates for a fair trial.

Front

What is the impact of personal biases on the jurors' decisions?

Back

Personal biases can cloud judgment and lead to unfair conclusions, as seen in the initial votes and discussions among the jurors.

Front

How does the setting of the jury room contribute to the play's themes?

Back

The jury room setting creates a confined space for intense dialogue and conflict, symbolizing the struggle for justice and truth.

Front

What is the importance of reasonable doubt in a jury's decision?

Back

Reasonable doubt is a legal standard that requires jurors to be convinced of a defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt before delivering a verdict.