PSYC 100 Exam 3 Review

Front

What is the subject case in an analogical argument?

Back

The case about which we are trying to draw a conclusion

Front

_________ is a fallacious argument which appeals to the fact that there is no evidence for a claim.

Back

Appeal to ignorance

Front

Which of the following is one of the 5 criteria needed for an appeal to authority to be valid? Subject matter must be within area of expertise, True premises, Logical strength, Authority must be a government official

Back

Subject matter must be within area of expertise

Front

"Many people who have lung cancer are smokers. Having lung cancer causes people to smoke." is an example of ??

Back

Confusing cause and effect

Front

True or false: A deductive argument is one where the truth of the premises guarantees the truth of the conclusion.

Back

True

Front

Affirming the antecedent has which argument form? Options: If p then q. If q then r. Therefore, if p then r.; If p then q. p. Therefore, q.; If p then q. q. Therefore, p.; If p then q. Not-q. Therefore, not-p.

Back

If p then q. p. Therefore, q.

Front

True or false: Denying the consequent is a valid deductive argument form.

Back

True

Front

Which of the following is a truth-functional statement? I ran this morning and made myself breakfast. It is sunny outside. My favorite color is maroon. My sister ate all the chips.

Back

I ran this morning and made myself breakfast.

Front

______ arguments are useful for generating new knowledge.

Back

inductive

Front

Which of the following is a valid deductive argument form? Denying the antecedent, Statistical syllogism, Affirming the antecedent, Affirming the consequent

Back

Affirming the antecedent