Unit 3 Part B Act 4

Unit 3 - The Lid

Multiple Choice

How many parts is the Unit 3 exam split into?

• 2

• 3

• 7

• 8

Multiple Choice

Which activity do you carry out in Activity 4 of part B?

• Evaluation

• Proposal

• Time Plan

• Sketches

Draw

Draw an isometric shape that is not a cube/cuboid.

Multiple Choice

Which of the following is the first step in the design process for modifying a product in Part B?

• Sketch the design

• Identify the design requirements

• Create a prototype

• Test the final product

Fill in the Blanks

The activities in my time plan will directly linked to the

I am making to the design.

Multiple Choice

What is the purpose of the design specification?

• To outline the design requirements and constraints

• To provide instructions for manufacturing the product

• To describe the target market for the product

• To analyse the strengths and weaknesses of the product

Re - Cap

Part A

You should have carried out your research.

Collecting information to help you come with design ideas, but importantly - give you the support to JUSTIFY your solution.

Act 1 - Time Plan - Journal

Act 2 - Technical/ Design Spec

Act 3 - Sketches

Act 4 - Proposal

Act 5 - Evaluation

​Part B

Part A - Research

COMPLETE

How is it broken down?

L32 Activity 4 - Develop a modified Bracket with relevant design documentation (30 marks) — AUEA (fireflycloud.net)

​Today we will be covering Activity 4

Multiple Choice

What is the main objective of Activity 4 in the Unit 3 - Engineering exam?

• To develop a new product design

• To develop a modified solution

• To manufacture a product

• To analyse the market for a new product

Orthographic Drawings

• Orthographic Symbol

• 3rd Angle Projection

• Dimensions added to drawing

• Materials clearly drawn

• Accurate and detailed representation of components

• Excellent use of orthographic techniques allowing the solution to be recognised and to BS8888 standards

Isometric

• Excellent Isometric drawing

• Dimensions added

• Detailed Exploded drawing showing how the clamp could work

• Technical language used throughout to explain the features and solution

• Scale added to drawing (NTS)

• Components are highly accurate and perfect in proportion

• Concise annotation of the solution which would allow a competent third party to effectively interpret how to manufacture the solution

• Comprehensive range of relevant formal documentation to communicate the solution effectively

More detailed annotations, this time you are giving more in depth justification

Pros and Cons

Make comparison

What else did you consider?

Use the properties to support you.

Support your Iso Sketch with other views?

​

• Dimensions added

• Detailed Exploded drawing showing how the solution could work

• Technical language used throughout to explain the features and solution

• Scale added to drawing (NTS)

• Components are highly accurate and perfect in proportion

• Concise annotation of the solution which would allow a competent third party to effectively interpret how to manufacture the solution

• Comprehensive range of relevant formal documentation to communicate the solution effectively

• Provided a final design drawing of an optimised solution in isometric and via an orthographic Drawing

• Generated further drawings and detailed technical annotation (of all the drawings) as appropriate to ensure that the solution was communicated effectively and would allow a competent third party to interpret how to manufacture it

• Produced a series of relevant technical comments (with justification) under a series of sub-titles that related to their consideration/use of existing products, materials selection for different parts of the solution, manufacturing process selection for different parts of the solution and sustainability at all stages of the product life cycle

Open Ended

What is the purpose of the detailed exploded drawing mentioned in the text?

Open Ended

Why is technical language an important aspect of communicating the features and solution of a product?

Draw

Draw a simple car using orthographic projection.

Fill in the Blanks

Concise annotation of the solution would allow a competent third party to effectively interpret how to ___________ ___ ________