APGOPO Required SC Cases

McCullough v Maryland use this clause to argue that the federal government had the power to create a National bank.

• commerce clause

• establishment clause

• necessary and proper clause

• free exercise clause

This case established judicial review

• Mapp v. Ohio

• McCulloch v. Maryland

• Marbury v. Madison

• Plessy v. Ferguson

This case guarantees each person the right to an attorney

• Marbury v. Madison

• Miranda v. Arizona

• McCulloch v. Maryland

• Gideon v. Wainwright

This case established the "separate but equal" doctrine

• McCulloch v. Maryland

• Plessy v. Ferguson

• U.S. v. Nixon

• Miranda v. Arizona

In Schenck v US, justice Holmes said that speech can be restricted when it

• is uttered by govt. officials in an effort to establish religion
• is expressed on public property
• advocates the violent overthrow of the US
• provokes "clear & present danger" to the people

Using this clause, the state of Maryland could not tax the national bank.

• Supremacy Clause

• Necessary and Proper Clause

• Establishment Clause

• Due Process Clause

In the case of Lopez, this misuse of this clause set him free.

• Due Process

• Writ of Habeas Corpus

• Commerce

• Exclusionary

The holding of Engel v Vitale stated that school sponsorship of religious activities violates this clause.

• Bill of Attainder

• Due Process

• Free Exercise Clause

• Establishment Clause

Which tow SC cases were based on the commerce clause?

• McCullough v Maryland; Marbury v Madison

• US v Lopez; McCullough v Maryland

• Engel v Vitale; Marbury v Madison

• US v Lopez; Wisconsin v Yoder

The free exercise clause was used in which SC case?

• Engel v Vitale

• Wisconsin v Yoder

• Gideon v Wainwright

• Schenck v US