Ch. 4&5 (Non-discriminatory Evaluation/Program Development)

Prior to ________ many school systems attempted to circumvent the racial desegregation process by using standardized tests and testing procedures to place minority children into segregated programs within public schools.

• PASE v. Hannon (1980)

• Hobson v. Hansen (1967)

• C. Larry P. v. Riles (1972)

• D. Raymond S. v. Ramirez (1996)

In _______ , the court ordered reevaluations of every African American child identified as EMR using developmental and health histories, adaptive behavior observations and diagnostic tests that focused on identifying learning needs and pedagogical approaches.

• PASE v. Hannon (1980)

• Hobson v. Hansen (1967)

• Larry P. v. Riles (1979)

• None of the above

Nondiscriminatory testing procedures require

• Test and evaluative materials be presented in the child's native language or mode of communication.

• Testing material be administered by trained personnel in conformance with the producer's instructions.

• Evaluative materials be validated for the purpose for which they are being used.

• All of the above.

The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments have been used to legally focus on

• A. Denial of an education without due process

• B. Denial of property rights without due process of law

• C. Nondiscriminatory evaluation

• D. Both a and b

The two cases that were most influential in the area known as the "Right to Education" were:

• Halderman v. Pennhurst (1979) and PARC v. Pennsylvania (1972)

• Wyatt v. Stickney (1971, 1974) and Halderman v. Pennhurst (1979)

• PARC v. Pennsylvania (1972) and Mills v. Board of Education of District of Columbia (1972)

• Wyatt v. Stickney (1971, 1974) and Halderman v. Pennhurst (1979)

An IFSP closely parallels the IEP and has a new component which is...

• an explanation of the extent to which the child will not participate with nondisabled children in regular class activities.

• a functional evaluation of the child in the child's customary environment.

• the inclusion of five special factors that may significantly impact the development of an appropriate IEP.

• a description of the appropriate transition services for the infant or toddler.

In what case did the decision of the court accept the decisions in Rowley and Grace by stating that "there is no requirement that state educators must maximize the potential of the child," but that IDEA requires only "that the child receive some form of specialized education that is sufficient to confer some educational benefit."

• Springdale v. Grace (1982)

• Steinberg v. Weast (2001)

• Board of Education v. Rowley (1982)

• Burlington School Committee v. Department of Education of Massachusetts (1985)

This court case expanded on Rowley and maintained that students in special education must make more progress than de minimus.

• Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District (2017)

• Burlington School Committee v. Department of Education of Massachusetts (1985)

• Arlington Central School District v. Murphy (2006)

• Citizens United v. FEC (2010)

The case that addressed the issue of appropriate methodology for implementing an IEP for a child who was deaf was

• Mills v. Board of Education of District of Columbia (1972)

• PARC v. Pennsylvania (1972)

• Wyatt v. Stickney (1974)

• Board of Education v. Rowley (1982)

The purpose of the IEP review is:

• Determine if IEP goals are met

• Revise the IEP in case of shortcomings

• Address the effects of reevaluation

• All of the above