Proof Review

What is statement #1?

• BC≅DC
• AC≅EC
• BC≅DC, AC≅EC
• ∆BCA≅∆DCE

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

What is statement #2?

• ∠ABC≅∠EDC
• ∠BCA≅∠DCE
• BC≅CD
• ∠E≅∠A

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

What is reason #1?

• Reflexive Property
• Definition of Bisect
• Prove
• Given

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

What is reason #2?

• Definition of Midpoint
• Definition of Perpendicular
• Definition of Bisect
• Definition of Right Triangle

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

What congruency postulate proves the triangles congruency?

• SAS
• ASA
• SSS
• HL

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

What postulate proves these triangles congruent?

• SAS
• HL
• AAS
• ASA

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

What postulate would prove triangle ∆NYQ is congruent to ∆PYQ?

• ASA
• SAS
• SSS
• HL

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

What is the missing piece of information required to prove these triangles congruent?

• QY ≅ QY
• NY ≅ PY
• ∠N ≅ ∠P
• QY is the perpendicular bisector

Tags

CCSS.HSG.SRT.B.5

What type of angle pair is ∠1 and ∠3?

• alternate interior angles
•  supplementary angles
• corresponding angles
• vertical angles 

Tags

CCSS.8.G.A.5

Name the angle relationship.

• Alternate Interior
• Alternate Exterior
• Corresponding
• Vertical Angles

Tags

CCSS.8.G.A.5