The Nature of Science

At one point in time, many people thought disease was caused by fate or by incorrect behavior. Following the invention of the microscope, bacteria were discovered. After this, a new theory of what causes disease arose that was known as the germ theory.  Why was the original theory modified? 

• It quickly became obvious that germs cause disease.
• The person who invented the microscope became ill.
• New evidence prompted revision to the original ideas.
• The proponents of the germ theory had political power.

The theory of plate tectonics states that Earth’s crust is made of sections that move. Which of the following is NOT evidence that can be used to support the theory of plate tectonics?

• The sea floor is spreading apart from mid-ocean rifts.
• Mountains push up where two plates bump into each other.
• The same species of bird is found in North America and South America.
• The continents look as if they fit together like pieces of a jigsaw puzzle.

Tags

NGSS.MS-ESS2-3

Why is it important that scientists modify scientific theories when important new information is discovered?

• to confuse other scientists
• to keep the theory interesting and fresh
• to keep the theory as accurate and effective as possible
• to make sure the general public does not understand the theory

Tags

NGSS.MS-ETS1-4

Joe tells Mai his theory about why sea turtles nest on the beach instead of in the ocean. He says, “The turtle eggs would sink to the bottom of the ocean, and the baby turtles would drown.” Joe says his uncle is a fisherman, who told Joe this information. Mai tells Joe that his theory is not scientific. Which explanation supports Mai’s evaluation of Joe’s theory?

• Joe’s idea is already a scientific law. 
• Joe’s idea is not supported by scientific evidence. 
• Joe’s idea is a good guess that can be tested by experiments. 
• Joe’s idea accurately explains why sea turtles nest on the beach. 

 A biologist is investigating the effects of growth hormone on the rate of metamorphosis in butterflies. Which of the following methods of investigation would work best for the biologist investigating any possible effects?

• models
• controlled experiments
• systematic observations
• random sampling of populations

Tags

NGSS.MS-LS1-5

Eduardo is a conservation biologist. He needs to develop a plan to preserve wetlands. He begins his project by studying the data in the following chart. How is Eduardo using scientific methods in developing a plan?

• He is analyzing data about causes and effects.
• He is analyzing a hypothesis about causes and effects.
• He is proposing an experiment about causes and effects.
• He is using intuition to determine causes and effects.

Tags

NGSS.MS-ESS3-3

NGSS.MS-LS2-1

Scientists discuss and debate experimental results and possible explanations in studying phenomena. Which best explains why scientists debate while searching for explanations?

• because debating helps scientists focus on empirical evidence, analyzing both the strengths and weaknesses of the evidence
• because debating helps the scientific community to present interesting and exciting science to the public
• because debating gives scientists an opportunity to express their feelings and opinions about the subject
• because every scientist wants to find an accurate explanation and disprove others’ explanations

Tags

NGSS.MS-PS2-4

Which of the following is a scientific observation? 

• The potato is brown in color.
• The potato tastes the best.
• The potato may cause allergies.
• The potato smells funny. 

What is another word for hypothesis?

• evidence
• graph
• investigation
• prediction

Justin blows his nose, but mucus seems to leak through the tissue.  He decides to test which tissue holds up the best while sneezing.  What is the independent variable?

• sneezing
• Justin
• amount of tissue
• type of tissue

Tags

NGSS.3-5-ETS1-3