Search Header Logo

Persuasion in Political Debates

Authored by Ailene Aguirre

English

10th Grade

CCSS covered

Used 10+ times

Persuasion in Political Debates
AI

AI Actions

Add similar questions

Adjust reading levels

Convert to real-world scenario

Translate activity

More...

    Content View

    Student View

15 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a rhetorical fallacy?

A true argument

A statement that reflects true facts in politics

False statement with convincing evidence

Tags

CCSS.RI.11-12.8

CCSS.RI. 9-10.8

CCSS.RI.9-10.5

CCSS.RI.8.5

CCSS.RI.8.8

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

A fallacy that unfairly appeals the audience's emotions is a(n)

Ethical Fallacy

Logical Fallacy

Emotional Fallacy

Rhetorical Fallacy

Tags

CCSS.RI.11-12.8

CCSS.RI. 9-10.8

CCSS.RI.9-10.5

CCSS.RI.8.5

CCSS.RI.8.8

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

An ethical fallacy:

Unfairly advances the author's authority.

Uses emotion to convince people.

Uses faulty statements to convince people.

Tags

CCSS.RI.11-12.8

CCSS.RI. 9-10.8

CCSS.RI.9-10.5

CCSS.RI.8.5

CCSS.RI.11-12.5

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

A fallacy that depends on faulty logic is a:

Ethical Fallacy

Emotional Fallacy

Logical Fallacy

Tags

CCSS.RI.11-12.8

CCSS.RI. 9-10.8

CCSS.RI.9-10.5

CCSS.RI.8.5

CCSS.RI.11-12.5

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

"If you don't vote for me, you will end up homeless" is a

Red Herring

Bandwagon Appeal

Scare tactic

Tags

CCSS.RI.11-12.8

CCSS.RI. 9-10.8

CCSS.RI.9-10.5

CCSS.RI.11-12.5

CCSS.RI.8.8

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

"If you lose your pencil you will fail the class, not graduate, and end up homeless" is a:

Slippery Slope

False Need

Guilt by Association

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

A: We need to regulate access to handguns. B: My opponent believes that we should ignore the rights guaranteed to us as citizens of the United States by the Constitution. Unlike my opponent, I am a firm believer in the Constitution, and a proponent of freedom.

This is a:

Ad Hominem

Using Authority Instead of Evidence

Dogmatism

Strawperson Argument

Tags

CCSS.RI.11-12.8

CCSS.RI. 9-10.8

CCSS.RI.9-10.5

CCSS.RI.8.5

CCSS.RI.11-12.5

Access all questions and much more by creating a free account

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

Already have an account?