Peer Evaluation

Who was the presenter?

Tags

CCSS.RI.11-12.8

CCSS.RI.4.7

CCSS.RI.9-10.7

CCSS.RL.5.7

CCSS.RL.7.7

PREPARATION: CLEAR AND SMOOTH DELIVERY; ORGANIZED

• Poor: More thorough preparation was required for the presentation and performance to run smoothly

• Good: The preparation for the presentation was generally organized and the performance ran quite smoothly.

• Excellent: The preparation for the presentation was very well organized and the performance ran smoothly.

Tags

CCSS.RI.9-10.7

CCSS.RL.11-12.8

CCSS.RL.4.7

CCSS.RL.6.7

CCSS.RL.7.7

RELEVANT INFORMATION PRESENTED

• Poor: Some of the information did not relate directly to the topic

• Good: Most of the information was accurate and related directly to the topic

• Excellent: All the information was highly accurate and relevant to the key topic

Tags

CCSS.RI.11-12.8

CCSS.RI.7.7

CCSS.RI.8.7

CCSS.RL.11-12.8

CCSS.RL.4.7

ORAL PRESENTATION: CLARITY

• Poor: Student sometimes uses confusing words and terms and needs to give examples to help explain the ideas.

• Good: Student uses understandable words and terms, but needs examples to clarify major ideas.

• Excellent: Student uses words, terms, and examples which the audience clearly understand.

Tags

CCSS.RI.11-12.8

CCSS.RI.7.7

CCSS.RL.6.7

CCSS.RI.5.7

CCSS.RL.9-10.7

The best part of this presentation was:

Tags

CCSS.RI.7.7

CCSS.RI.4.7

CCSS.RI.8.7

CCSS.RL.5.7

CCSS.RL.8.7

One area that may need developing is: