Landmark Supreme Court Cases- 3.12

Landmark Supreme Court Cases- 3.12

7th Grade

17 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Mr. Grant's Civics: Ch. 11 Unit Test, #1

Mr. Grant's Civics: Ch. 11 Unit Test, #1

7th Grade

12 Qs

Supreme Court and Landmark Cases

Supreme Court and Landmark Cases

7th Grade - University

15 Qs

Landmark Supreme Court Cases

Landmark Supreme Court Cases

7th Grade

16 Qs

SS.7.C.3.12

SS.7.C.3.12

7th - 8th Grade

17 Qs

Supreme Court Cases

Supreme Court Cases

7th Grade

19 Qs

Landmark Supreme Court Cases

Landmark Supreme Court Cases

7th - 8th Grade

13 Qs

Landmark Court Cases Lumbrezo

Landmark Court Cases Lumbrezo

7th Grade - University

15 Qs

Impact of Law Review

Impact of Law Review

6th - 8th Grade

16 Qs

Landmark Supreme Court Cases- 3.12

Landmark Supreme Court Cases- 3.12

Assessment

Quiz

Social Studies

7th Grade

Medium

Created by

Alexander Ellison

Used 275+ times

FREE Resource

17 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

 3.12 The case established the Court’s power of judicial review.  The Court had the duty of interpreting the law. If the court identifies a law in conflict with the Constitution, the law is invalid.
Marbury V. Madison
Tinker v. Des Moines 
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier
Miranda v. Arizona 

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

3.12 Ruled schools have the right to control activities they sponsor (pay for) for educational purposes. Qualified the Tinker ruling by allowing censorship under these circumstances.
In Re Gault 
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier
Tinker v. Des Moines
Gideon v. Wainwright 

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

3.12 Ruled that governments should be required to provide a lawyer to defendants too poor to afford one if they are charged with a felony.
Gideon v. Wainwright 
Miranda v. Arizona 
In Re Gault 
Tinker v. Des Moines

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

3.12 Ruled that suspects must always be informed of their rights before interrogation. Police must read suspects their “Miranda Rights”
Miranda v. Arizona 
In Re Gault 
Gideon v. Wainwright 
Tinker v. Des Moines

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

3.12 Ruled that juvenile courts should have different procedures, but due process rights still apply to children.
In Re Gault 
Miranda v. Arizona 
Gideon v. Wainwright 
Tinker v. Des Moines

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

3.12 Ruled that racial segregation did not violate right to “equal protection,” (14th Amendment). Facilities provided to each were “separate but equal.” Segregation strengthened across south.
Brown v. Board of Education
Plessy v. Ferguson 
Gideon v. Wainwright 
In Re Gault 

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

3.12 Ruled racially segregated public schools violated “equal protection.” Facilities provided to African-Americans inferior, not equal. First step toward ending racial segregation in South.
Brown v. Board of Education
Plessy v. Ferguson 
Gideon v. Wainwright 
In Re Gault 

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
or continue with
Microsoft
Apple
Others
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
Already have an account?