DC - Pearson Good Reasons - Chapters 1-3
Authored by Andrew Pokorny
English
12th Grade - University
CCSS covered
Used 11+ times
AI Actions
Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...
Content View
Student View
20 questions
Show all answers
1.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Of these choices which best aligns with the text's definition of argument
An opinion
An opinion that's persuasive
A contested opinion that relies primarily on gut-level emotional reactions.
A controversial claim supported with evidence, reasoning, and analysis.
2.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Arguing in the interest of the audience, being honest about one's argumentative goals, and open about your sources are characteristics of...
Rogerian argument.
traditional argument.
ethical and responsible argument
inverted argument
3.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Inquiry in the context of argumentation often serves which of the following purposes?
Creating journals that help authors record their thoughts and feelings about topics for both expository and persuasive writing?
Generating lines of questions that can lead to constructing strong claims/thesis statements, guiding research, and helping to formulate strong supporting details.
It has little use in guiding thesis writing or support, but can be used to respond too counterarguments.
Trick question: Inquiry can serve no substantial purpose in formulating arguments.
Tags
CCSS.RI.2.1
CCSS.RI.3.1
CCSS.RL.2.1
CCSS.RL.3.1
CCSS.RL.1.1
4.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
"How does my audience feel about this issue?" "What experiences have they had that may make them react a particular way on an issue?" are questions that can...
help a writer evaluate audience value warrants.
help a writer evaluate his or her own value warrants.
help a writer decide on how much expository material to include before making his or her argument.
help a writer evaluate his or her own logical warrants.
Tags
CCSS.RI.8.8
CCSS.RI.8.1
CCSS.RL.11-12.1
CCSS.RL.8.1
CCSS.RL.9-10.1
5.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Which of the following lines of questions are best suited to guiding research to directly support an argument's claim?
What level of formality will be most appropriate for my venue/publication? Will my audience be impressed or confused by advanced diction?
What are the major discourse communities that compose my audience? What background experiences may stand between me and my audience?
What ordering will best communicate my ideas to the audience? Should I lead with my thesis in the introduction or build to it and state it in the conclusion?
"What do I need to learn about this issue? Who are well-known experts on this issue? What information might need to be corroborated by experts and trusted authorities?
Tags
CCSS.RI.2.1
CCSS.RI.3.1
CCSS.RL.2.1
CCSS.RL.3.1
CCSS.RI.1.1
6.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Showing regard for your opposition's position and thinking of argument as winning allies instead of defeating foes...
help one argue respectfully but generate a unassertive tone.
create a tone of disrespect
do not affect argumentative tone.
help one argue respectfully and generate a moderate tone.
7.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
"Who wrote this argument and why? Are the sources biased? Do the claim, support and warrants align? Are there fallacies?" Are best described as...
questions related to the expository writing process.
questions related to identifying audience value warrants.
Questions to help focus and identify authorial value warrants.
Questions related to critically reading.
Access all questions and much more by creating a free account
Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports
Continue with Google
Continue with Email
Continue with Classlink
Continue with Clever
or continue with
Microsoft
%20(1).png)
Apple
Others
Already have an account?
