Unit 8 Review - Microscopes

What is the main idea of "Make Your Own Microscope"?

• The materials to make smartphone microscopes cost less than $10.

• Smartphone microscopes are cheap, easy to make, and effective tools.

• Smartphone microscopes are very portable, and they can take pictures.

• Creating a smartphone microscope can teach one a lot about lasers and diodes.

Tags

CCSS.RI.4.3

CCSS.RI.4.5

CCSS.RI.5.3

CCSS.RI.5.5

CCSS.RI.6.5

Which detail supports the main idea in "Make Your Own Microscope" that smartphone microscopes are cheap, easy to make, and effective tools?

• Smartphones themselves cost between $250 and $400.

• Real microscopes are more than six times more powerful than smartphone microscopes.

• Like smartphone microscopes, real microscopes also have cameras that can take pictures and record video.

• One can spend just $7.99 on the materials needed to convert a smartphone into a microscope.

Tags

CCSS.RI.5.2

CCSS.RI.6.2

CCSS.RL.5.1

CCSS.RL.5.2

CCSS.RL.6.2

Which statement is a fact?

• Many smartphones cost between $250 and $400.

• Being able to record video with a microscope is valuable.

• There are some good things about smartphone microscopes.

• A smartphone microscope is not a suitable replacement for a real microscope

Tags

CCSS.RL.11-12.6

Why did author of "Stick to Real Microscopes" write that piece?

• to amuse readers with a funny tale about microscopes

• to simply inform readers about the history of microscopes

• to express his opinion about microscopes to readers

• to instruct readers how to use a microscope

Tags

CCSS.RI.6.6

CCSS.RI.6.9

CCSS.RL.4.6

CCSS.RL.5.6

CCSS.RL.6.6

How do the author's beliefs influence "Stick to Real Microscopes"?

• He believes that smartphones are relatively cheap, so he includes information about how much most smartphones cost.

• He believes that converting a smartphone into a microscope is a worthwhile project, so he describes how to do so.

• He believes that being able to record videos with a microscope is valuable, so he includes details about real microscopes that can do so.

• He believes that microscopes do not need to be that powerful, so he does not address how much any type of microscope can magnify objects.

Tags

CCSS.RI.6.6

CCSS.RI.6.9

CCSS.RL.4.6

CCSS.RL.5.6

CCSS.RL.6.6

Read these lines from "Stick to Real Microscopes."

Let me just say, right now, that I wish that she was correct. It would be terrific if she was right. Unfortunately, I do not think she is. In fact, I think she is wrong on both counts. Turning a smartphone into a microscope is not cheap, and it does not create a great scientific tool. In my opinion, people should not do it.

Which point of view does the writer use in these lines?

• third-person limited point of view

• first-person point of view

• third-person omniscient point of view

• second-person point of view

Read these lines from "Make Your Own Microscope."

But there’s also the fact that my smartphone microscope is light. It’s portable. I can take it with me anywhere. Plus, using its video function, I can even record whatever I’m looking at. That means I can capture motion and changes over time.

Which answer choice is an effective paraphrase of these lines?

• Being able to record videos with a microscope is the most important function there is because that lets one capture movement. It helps that smartphone microscopes are light and easy to carry, too.

• A "smartphone microscope is light." It's also "portable." It's possible to "take it" with you "anywhere." Also, "using its video function," one can "record whatever" one is "looking at."

• Smartphone microscopes are light. They're way lighter than real microscopes. Real microscopes are actually very heavy and hard to move.

• A smartphone microscope weighs very little and can be easily transported. Also, it can record videos that show movement and transformations.

Tags

CCSS.RI.4.3

CCSS.RI.5.3

CCSS.RI.5.5

CCSS.RI.6.3

CCSS.RI.6.5

How are the structures of "Make Your Own Microscope" and "Stick to Real Microscopes" similar?

• In both texts, the writers ignore points, ideas, or arguments that others might have and that go against their own stated opinions.

• In both texts, the writers deliver an opinion about smartphone microscopes at the beginning and then provide facts and details that support that opinion.

• In both texts, the writers describe personal experiences they have had with smartphone microscopes in order to support their points.

• In both texts, the writers use a question-and-answer pattern that helps them to lay out their ideas in a logical, easy-to-follow way for readers.

Tags

CCSS.RI.5.7

CCSS.RI.6.7

CCSS.RL.4.7

CCSS.RL.5.7

CCSS.RL.6.9

Which statement accurately describes the viewpoints presented in "Make Your Own Microscopes" and "Stick to Real Microscopes"?

• The writer of "Make Your Own Microscope" values portability more than the writer of "Stick to Real Microscopes."

• The writer of "Make Your Own Microscope" thinks real microscopes are not powerful enough, while the writer of "Stick to Real Microscopes" thinks they are.

• The writer of "Make Your Own Microscope" thinks everyone should have a smartphone microscope and a real microscope, while the writer of "Stick to Real Microscopes" does not.

• The writer of "Make Your Own Microscope" cares more about the cost of smartphones than the writer of "Stick to Real Microscopes."

Tags

CCSS.RI.5.7

CCSS.RI.6.7

CCSS.RL.4.7

CCSS.RL.5.7

CCSS.RL.6.9

Which statement best describes how effectively or ineffectively the writer of "Make Your Own Microscope" conveyed her opinion that converting a smartphone to a microscope is educational?

• The writer conveyed her opinion somewhat effectively by backing it up with a personal story about her search for a real microscope at the mall.

• The writer was not very effective in conveying her opinion because she does not give any facts related to what the project taught her.

• The writer conveyed her opinion effectively by supporting it with details related to what she learned about diodes and lasers during the project.

• The writer was totally ineffective in conveying her opinion because she claims that the project only cost her $7.99.