Persuasive Presentation Feedback

Presenter's Name"

Structure of the persuasive presentation

• Shows no overall organization or planning

• Shows little overall organization. May lack many of the followings: introduction, hook, background information, thesis, supporting details, counterargument, refutation, and conclusion

• Creates an organized presentation, but its structure breaks down at times. May lack an introduction, hook, background information, thesis, supporting details, counterargument, refutation, and conclusion

• Creates an organized essay. May lack one or two of the followings: introduction, hook, background information, thesis statement, supporting paragraphs, counterargument, refutation, and conclusion

• There is a purposeful organization within the presentation, including introduction, hook, background information, thesis statement, supporting paragraphs, counterargument, refutation, and conclusion

Tags

CCSS.RI. 9-10.8

CCSS.RI.11-12.5

CCSS.RI.11-12.8

CCSS.RI.8.5

CCSS.RI.9-10.5

Evidence and Elaboration

• Contains no evidence nor elaboration

• Evidence without indicating or using a quote, or something unrelated to the topic. Elaboration not related to the evidence and/or topic

• Evidence using appropriate quotations. Elaboration is loosely related to the quote and too general. Elaboration is a paraphrase of an event in the novel.

• Evidence using an appropriate quote to support the claim. Elaboration is related to the evidence but lacking supporting details in the commentary.

• The evidence is appropriate and supports the claim. Elaboration is clear, relevant to the evidence, and contains additional support to the position.

Tags

CCSS.RI.7.8

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

Position and Supports

• The position is unclear. No support or evidence is indicated

• Attempts to take a position. Includes at least one support without evidence for the position. Evidence does not support the position.

• Establishes a position on a topic. Includes a concrete detail with at least two commentaries explaining the evidence.

• Establishes a position on a topic. Includes a concrete detail with at least two commentaries that explain and persuade towards the claim.

• Establishes a position on a topic. Includes several concrete details with at least two commentaries per concrete detail that explain and use logos, pathos, or egos to persuade towards the claim.

Language Use

• Contains far below grade level vocabulary. Contains numerous errors that totally obscure meaning. Contains words that ar unclear

• Contains far below grade level vocabulary. Contains numerous errors that totally obscure meaning. Contains words that are unclear

• Contains slightly below grade level vocabulary. Contains some errors that occasionally obscure meaning. Is mostly clear.

• Is mostly clear. Contains few errors that rarely obscure meaning. Is clear.

• Contains at and above grade level vocabulary. Contains minimal or no errors that obscure meaning. Is clear

Tags

CCSS.RI.7.7

CCSS.RI.8.7

CCSS.RI.9-10.7

CCSS.RL.8.7

CCSS.RL.9-10.7

Persuasive Technique

-Glittering Generalities -Transfer -Plain Folks -Bandwagon

-Name Calling -Testimonial -Repetition

• Uses no persuasive techniques

• Uses one persuasive technique

• Uses a few persuasive techniques used somewhat effectively

• Uses a variety of persuasive techniques

• Uses a variety of persuasive techniques effectively

Tags

CCSS.L.11-12.6

CCSS.L.9-10.6

CCSS.W.11-12.2D

CCSS.W.8.2D

CCSS.W.9-10.2D