3.5 - 3.6 Review

3.5 - 3.6 Review

11th - 12th Grade

13 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Perdagangan Internasional

Perdagangan Internasional

11th Grade

10 Qs

6th Form General Knowledge

6th Form General Knowledge

12th Grade

18 Qs

Economics Quiz

Economics Quiz

11th Grade - University

10 Qs

Renaissance and Reformation

Renaissance and Reformation

7th - 12th Grade

13 Qs

L34 Punishment and the CJS

L34 Punishment and the CJS

12th Grade

13 Qs

Grade 11 Short Quiz Unit 2 geographic Phenomenon 1

Grade 11 Short Quiz Unit 2 geographic Phenomenon 1

11th Grade

10 Qs

Kuis Perubahan Sosial

Kuis Perubahan Sosial

9th Grade - University

10 Qs

Boże Narodzenie w Polsce

Boże Narodzenie w Polsce

7th - 11th Grade

14 Qs

3.5 - 3.6 Review

3.5 - 3.6 Review

Assessment

Quiz

Social Studies

11th - 12th Grade

Medium

Created by

Lance Hyde

Used 6+ times

FREE Resource

AI

Enhance your content in a minute

Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...

13 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

“As the quotations earlier in this opinion demonstrate, the inherent right of self-defense has been central to the Second Amendment right. The handgun ban [by the District of Columbia] amounts to a prohibition of an entire class of ‘arms’ that is overwhelmingly chosen by American society for that lawful purpose. The prohibition extends, moreover, to the home, where the need for defense of self, family, and property is most acute. Under any of the standards of scrutiny that we have applied to enumerated constitutional rights. . . banning from the home ‘the most preferred firearm in the nation to ‘keep’ and use for protection of one’s home and family, . . .would fail constitutional muster.’”

-Associate Justice Antonin Scalia, majority opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008)

Supporters of Scalia’s view that handgun bans violate Second Amendment rights could cite which of the following Supreme Court cases to support their argument?

Shaw v. Reno (1993)

McDonald v. Chicago (2010)

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

“The Second Amendment was adopted to protect the right of the people of each of the several States to maintain a well-regulated militia. It was a response to concerns raised during the ratification of the Constitution that the power of Congress to disarm the state militias and create a national standing army posed an intolerable threat to the sovereignty of the several States. Neither the text of the Amendment nor the arguments advanced by its proponents evidenced the slightest interest in limiting any legislature’s authority to regulate private civilian uses of firearms. Specifically, there is no indication that the Framers of the Amendment intended to enshrine the common-law right of self-defense in the Constitution.”

Associate Justice John Paul Stevens, dissenting opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008)

Which of the following statements is most consistent with the author’s argument in this passage?

The Second Amendment does not protect a person’s right to have a weapon for self-defense

The Second Amendment states that the government cannot ban the sale of any weapon to any person

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Which of the following statements explains how the Supreme Court has attempted to balance the power of the government with protections for individual liberties?

In cases involving interpretations of the Second Amendment, the Court has shown a commitment to an individual’s right to own a gun

In cases involving interpretations of the Eighth Amendment, the Court has shown a commitment to the government’s right to punish as they deem necessary

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Court held that the District of Columbia could not ban the registration of handguns or require weapons to be nonfunctional in the home.

Which of the following amendments was the focus of the Court's ruling?

The Second Amendment

The Eighth Amendment

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Media Image

Which of the following amendments is most relevant to the topic of the cartoon?

The First Amendment

The Fourth Amendment

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

“It is clear that the ancient and humane limitation upon the State's ability to execute its sentences has as firm a hold upon the jurisprudence of today as it had centuries ago in England. The various reasons put forth in support of the common-law restriction [on executing the insane] have no less logical, moral, and practical force than they did when first voiced. For today, no less than before, we may seriously question the retributive value of executing a person who has no comprehension of why he has been singled out and stripped of his fundamental right to life.”

-Associate Justice Thurgood Marshall, majority opinion in Ford v. Wainwright (1986)

Based on the text, which of the following amendments was the focus of the Court’s ruling in Ford v. Wainwright (1986)?

The Second Amendment

The Fourth Amendment

The Sixth Amendment

The Eighth Amendment

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

“Everyone believes that the FBI should have the tools it needs to catch dangerous criminals. But too often over the past decade, intelligence and law enforcement agencies choose approaches that sweep up information from millions of innocent Americans instead of targeting terrorists and criminals. These approaches don’t make us safer.

“The changes to Rule 41 allow the FBI to hack millions of victims of cybercrime. These victims of hacks are regular people, not criminals.”

-Cecilia Kang, “Ron Wyden Discusses Encryption, Data Privacy and Security,” New York Times, October 9, 2016

Based on the text, which of the following statements would Senator Wyden most likely agree with?

The prohibition of warrantless searches of suspected criminals fails to protect citizens from potential crimes

The Fourth Amendment does not protect the collection of digital metadata and should not require a warrant

Protection from unreasonable searches and seizures in the Fourth Amendment can reasonably be suspended to promote public safety

The need for public safety should not exceed an individual’s protection from unreasonable search and seizure

Create a free account and access millions of resources

Create resources

Host any resource

Get auto-graded reports

Google

Continue with Google

Email

Continue with Email

Classlink

Continue with Classlink

Clever

Continue with Clever

or continue with

Microsoft

Microsoft

Apple

Apple

Others

Others

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy

Already have an account?