Valid Reasoning Pretest

Inductive Reasoning means...

• Guessing
• Testing and observing patterns to make conjectures
• Explaining why
• Reasoning from a general premise.

Deductive reasoning means...

• Guessing
• Ura nok seblu!
• Testing and observing patterns to make conjectures
• Making general observations of situations and applying them to specific situations.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

A sound argument is a valid deductive argument with true premises.

• True

• False

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

A syllogism is

• a literary comparison of two different things using like or as

• a previous statement or proposition from which another is inferred or follows as a conclusion.: "if the premise is true, then the conclusion must be true".

• a form of reasoning in which a conclusion is drawn from two premises), each of which shares a term with the conclusion, and shares a common or middle term not present in the conclusion

• justification or reasoning explaining how the evidence supports the argument.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

A premise is

• a literary comparison of two different things using like or as

• A previous statement or proposition from which another is inferred or follows as a conclusion.: "if the first statement is true, then the conclusion must be true".

• A form of reasoning in which a conclusion is drawn from two premises), each of which shares a term with the conclusion, and shares a common or middle term not present in the conclusion

• When you pledge to do as asked.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

The Giants have lost their last seven games. Thus, they will probably lose their next game.

What type of reasoning was used?

• Inductive

• Deductive

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

A warrant (in logical reasoning) is

• a literary comparison of two different things using like or as

• A previous statement or proposition from which another is inferred or follows as a conclusion.: "if the first statement is true, then the conclusion must be true".

• A form of reasoning in which a conclusion is drawn from two premises), each of which shares a term with the conclusion, and shares a common or middle term not present in the conclusion

• justification or reasoning explaining how the evidence supports the argument.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

A valid syllogism is

• a literary comparison of two different things using like or as

• A previous statement or proposition from which another is inferred or follows as a conclusion.: "if the first statement is true, then the conclusion must be true".

• when the syllogism has common terms in the two premises and leads logically to the conclusion. (If either premise is incorrect, the argument may still be unsound/incorrect).

• justification or reasoning explaining how the evidence supports the argument.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

A sound reasoning or argument is

• a literary comparison of two different things using like or as

• when a syllogism is correct with common terms in the two premises they lead logically to the conclusion AND the conclusion is reasonable and accurate.

• when the syllogism has common terms in the two premises and leads logically to the conclusion. (If either premise is incorrect, the argument may still be unsound/incorrect).

• justification or reasoning explaining how the evidence supports the argument.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

All students go to school. You are a student. Therefore you go to school.

What type of reasoning was used?

• Inductive

• Deductive

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1