Class 3 Doing Good Better 2022

Class 3 Doing Good Better 2022

University

7 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

financial and cost accounting

financial and cost accounting

University

10 Qs

TEMPERATE GRASSLANDS-PRAIRIES

TEMPERATE GRASSLANDS-PRAIRIES

KG - University

10 Qs

OBM301 Chapter 2

OBM301 Chapter 2

University

9 Qs

Persuasive Message

Persuasive Message

University

11 Qs

Pandemic- Failure of Governance and Challenges SIP Day 7

Pandemic- Failure of Governance and Challenges SIP Day 7

University

10 Qs

Appreciation of Ethics and Civilisation (MPU 3203)_Chapter 6

Appreciation of Ethics and Civilisation (MPU 3203)_Chapter 6

University

10 Qs

Presenting and Analysing Data

Presenting and Analysing Data

University

11 Qs

CURRENCY

CURRENCY

1st Grade - University

10 Qs

Class 3 Doing Good Better 2022

Class 3 Doing Good Better 2022

Assessment

Quiz

Social Studies

University

Practice Problem

Easy

Created by

Antonin Broi

Used 1+ times

FREE Resource

AI

Enhance your content in a minute

Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...

7 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

20 sec • 5 pts

What does consequentialism focus on?

The moral character of one’s personality.

The intrinsic moral status of one’s actions.

The outcomes of one’s actions.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 5 pts

What is utilitarianism (in ethics)?

The ethical theory according to which we ought to choose the action that maximizes global welfare.

The ethical theory according to which we ought to choose the action that is most useful for the goal we have (whatever it is).

The ethical theory according to which one ought to choose the action that is most useful for our egoistic goals.

The empirical theory according to which we are all rational and egoist (i.e. we care only about our own interests).

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 5 pts

Which one of the following theses is defended by Singer in his 1972 article?

People in affluent countries have a duty to help those in need as long as it does not go against anything morally significant.

Only the richest people in affluent countries have a duty to help those in need.

People in affluent countries have a collective duty to help those in need that can only be achieved via coordination.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

45 sec • 5 pts

According to Singer in his 1972 article, ...

every action commonly thought to belong to charity (not morally obligatory) should instead be considered as a moral duty.

there are actions commonly thought to belong to charity (not morally obligatory) that should instead be considered as moral duties.

every action commonly thought to be a moral duty should instead be considered as charity (not morally obligatory).

there are actions commonly thought to be moral duties that should instead be considered as charity (not morally obligatory).

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 5 pts

According to Singer in his 1972 article, what ethical difference does the existence of many other people who could help as well make to our duty to help those in need?

It makes no difference: we still have the same duty to help.

It makes a slight difference: the intensity of our duty is split among all the people who could help.

It makes a big difference: we have no duty to help as long as those who can help do not seek to coordinate to actually help.

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 5 pts

What does Temkin mean by a "pluralistic approach to our relations to the needy"?

We should help as many people as possible (rather than just a few).

There are several dimensions of the well-being of those in need that we should pay attention to.

There is convergence among different ethical perspectives that we ought to help the needy.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 5 pts

What is Williams’ "one thought too many" [une pensée de trop] objection against consequentialism?

A virtuous person should sometimes refrain from having certain thoughts about how to act.

Consequentialism, in practice, make individuals spend too much time thinking about the consequences of their actions, which leads to suboptimal decision-making.

In practice, it is impossible for individuals to work out the consequences of their actions as consequentialism would require.