unit 4 review

inaccurate more times than not -  should not be suggestive - should be blind - not suggest to the person witnessing any type of suggestivness 

• Fruit of the Poisonous Vine

• eyewitness identification

• 4th Amendment

• Mapp v Ohio / Exclusionary Rule

Neil vs. Biggers - makesure that lineups are set up to be non suggestive - the witnesses have to fit a certain criteria - deals with the 5th and 6th amendment - to what extent does the person feel comfortable (certainty), time in between when the crime was conducted vs the lineup

• Fruit of the Poisonous Vine

• eyewitness identification

• 4th Amendment

• Mapp v Ohio / Exclusionary Rule

protects citizens from unreasonable search and seizure 

• Fruit of the Poisonous Vine

• eyewitness identification

• 4th Amendment

• Mapp v Ohio / Exclusionary Rule

prevents prosecutors from using evidence in court that was obtained illegally (without warrent or probable cause)

• Fruit of the Poisonous Vine

• eyewitness identification

• 4th Amendment

• Mapp v Ohio / Exclusionary Rule

prevents prosecutors from using evidence in court that was obtained illegally (without warrent or probable cause)

• Fruit of the Poisonous Vine

• eyewitness identification

• 4th Amendment

• Mapp v Ohio / Exclusionary Rule

when police search your house or you they have to be looking for something specific 

• Fruit of the Poisonous Vine

• eyewitness identification

• 4th Amendment

• Mapp v Ohio / Exclusionary Rule

illegally obtained evidence cannot be used

• Fruit of the Poisonous Vine

• eyewitness identification

• 4th Amendment

• Mapp v Ohio / Exclusionary Rule

extends the exclusionary rule to make evidence inadmissible in court if it was derived from evidence that was illegally obtained

• Fruit of the Poisonous Vine

• eyewitness identification

• 4th Amendment

• Mapp v Ohio / Exclusionary Rule

no evidence can be used from an orignal illegal evidence

• Fruit of the Poisonous Vine

• eyewitness identification

• 4th Amendment

• Mapp v Ohio / Exclusionary Rule

permits the introduction of illegally obtained evidence if the prosecutor can prove that such evidence would have been lawfully discovered in the course of a routine, predictable investigation

• Inevitable Discovery Doctrine

• In Plain View Exception

• Good Faith Exception

• Automobile Exception