
Debate over Ratification:Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist
History
9th Grade
Used 9+ times

AI Actions
Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...
Content View
Student View
10 questions
Show all answers
1.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Which best describes the power of government under the Articles of Confederation
the national government had most of the power
congress enforced its power by taxing states
the states had more power than the national government
government served to successfully unite the needs of all the states
2.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Why did anti-federalists push for an addition of a Bill of Rights to the Constitution
there was a precedent for doing so in Great Britain's Constitution
they believed the government needed protection from possible uprisings
they believed that people's liberties needed protection from the government
there was already a requirement to do so but Federalists were ignoring it
3.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
The Great Compromise helped settle what issue
slavery
taxation
representation
power of the states
4.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Why did Anti-Federalists agree to ratify the Constitution
the addition of the Bill of Rights
the Necessary and Proper Clause
the 3/5 Compromise
the Articles of Confederation were added
5.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
What was the Federalists’ argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the Constitution?
A separate bill of rights might be used later to weaken America’s reputation.
A separate bill of rights be might used later to free enslaved people.
A separate bill of rights was unnecessary because the new government would have limited power.
A separate bill of rights was unnecessary because the Constitution was not taking away any rights from citizens.
6.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
The Anti-Federalists’ main objection to ratifying the Constitution was that it
had no bill of rights.
did not have a judiciary.
had no provision for a militia.
did not divide the central government.
7.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
The Bill of Rights is not necessary.
Federalist
Anti-Federalist
Access all questions and much more by creating a free account
Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports

Continue with Google

Continue with Email

Continue with Classlink

Continue with Clever
or continue with

Microsoft
%20(1).png)
Apple
Others
Already have an account?