What is wrong with this rocky shore aim?

What is wrong with this investigation aim?

To study the biological environment.

• It does not specify the location of the study.

• It does not specify the type of relationship it intends to find.

• It does not specify the organisms it intends to study

• All of the above.

What is wrong with this investigation aim?

To investigate the relationship between our organisms.

• It does not specify the location of the study.

• It does not specify the type of relationship it intends to find.

• It does not specify the organisms it intends to study

• All of the above.

What is wrong with this investigation aim?

To investigate the presence or absence of a pattern within the community.

• It does not specify the community it intends to study

• It is too specific.

• It has too much detail about the focus of the investigation.

• It does not clearly say whether it intends to find a pattern.

What is wrong with this investigation aim?

The aim of my investigation is to find the relationship between the 5 species I have picked.

• It does not specify the community it intends to study

• It assumes that there will be a relationship.

• It uses a personal pronoun.

• All of the above.

What is wrong with this investigation aim?

To find out the relationship between organisms on the rocky seashore.

• It does not specify the community it intends to study

• It assumes that there will be a relationship.

• It does not specify which organisms.

• All of the above.

What is wrong with this investigation aim?

To explore organisms with using the zonation.

• It does not specify the community it intends to study

• The grammar is misleading.

• It does not make the purpose of the investigation clear enough

• All of the above.

What is wrong with this investigation aim?

To observe and collect data about zonation along the rocky shore and the distribution of organisms.

• It contains redundancy (saying the same thing in more than one way)

• It specifies the location of the study

• It contains jargon (science specific words)

• It doesn't contain enough redundancy (saying the same thing in more than one way)

What is wrong with this investigation aim?

To investigate zonation of the Long Bay rocky shores.

• It specifies the community it intends to study.

• It specifies the pattern it intends to study.

• It is specific enough to write a hypothesis.

• None of the above

What is wrong with this investigation aim?

To investigate zonation along the intertidal zone along long bay beach.

• It specifies the beach rather than the rocky shore.

• It specifies the pattern it intends to study.

• It is specific enough to write a hypothesis.

• None of the above

What is wrong with this investigation aim?

To investigate the zonation of 5 species within intertidal zones.

• It does not specify the location of the study.

• It specifies the pattern it intends to study.

• It is specific enough to write a hypothesis.

• None of the above