
Supreme Court Cases
Authored by Krysta Wilcox
Social Studies
12th Grade
Used 5+ times

AI Actions
Add similar questions
Adjust reading levels
Convert to real-world scenario
Translate activity
More...
Content View
Student View
12 questions
Show all answers
1.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Which case determined the right of the accused to have a lawyer?
Mapp v Ohio
Gideon v Wainwright
Miranda v Arizona
Marbury v Madison
2.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Which amendment was the basis for overturning Plessy v Ferguson with the decision in Brown v Board of Education?
1st Amendment
4th Amendment
14th Amendment
15th Amendment
3.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
What was the result of McDonald v Chicago?
Guns could not be kept in cars
Guns could be carried concealed without a permit
The right to bear arms applies to the states
The right to bear arms is only permitted on federal land
4.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
Which of the following is NOT a case regarding First Amendment rights?
Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier
Schenck v US
Tinker v Des Moines
Lopez v US
5.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
45 sec • 1 pt
On what grounds did the Supreme Court find in favor of Bakke in the case of Regents of the University of California v Bakke?
His First Amenment rights were violated when the school prevented him from attendeing peaceful protests.
His right to due process was denied when the school kicked him out for a cheating accusation without investigaing.
Race could not be the sole factor used for admission. If it was, it violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
His Fourth Amendment rights were violated when his car was searched by campus police because it had a dent in the door.
6.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
According to the decision in Texas v Johnson, what is a protected form of expression under the First Amendment?
Burning down buildings
Riots in the streets
Burning an American Flag in protest
Threatening government officials with physical harm
7.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
30 sec • 1 pt
What was President Nixon's argument for executive privilege regarding the White House tapes in Nixon v US?
The tapes were his personal property, so they needed a warrant
The President is immune from all legal orders
The tapes were erased and could not be salvaged
The information on the tapes was important to the national interest and should be kept from other branches
Access all questions and much more by creating a free account
Create resources
Host any resource
Get auto-graded reports

Continue with Google

Continue with Email

Continue with Classlink

Continue with Clever
or continue with

Microsoft
%20(1).png)
Apple
Others
Already have an account?