Pozzulo et al. Results and Conclusion

Pozzulo et al. Results and Conclusion

12th Grade

7 Qs

quiz-placeholder

Similar activities

Trevor hendorson

Trevor hendorson

4th Grade - Professional Development

9 Qs

guess the catroon

guess the catroon

KG - University

11 Qs

Children Need . . .

Children Need . . .

9th - 12th Grade

12 Qs

cartoon charecters

cartoon charecters

KG - Professional Development

11 Qs

LES NOMBRES EN FRANÇAIS

LES NOMBRES EN FRANÇAIS

2nd - 12th Grade

10 Qs

Guess this Thing!

Guess this Thing!

KG - University

12 Qs

Cartoon

Cartoon

2nd Grade - University

11 Qs

Cartoons.

Cartoons.

7th - 12th Grade

10 Qs

Pozzulo et al. Results and Conclusion

Pozzulo et al. Results and Conclusion

Assessment

Quiz

Other

12th Grade

Medium

Created by

Zuraida Yahaya

Used 23+ times

FREE Resource

7 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

According to the study by Pozzulo et al., how did children perform in identifying familiar cartoon characters in target-present line-ups compared to unfamiliar human faces?

Children performed worse with cartoon characters.

Children performed better with cartoon characters.

Children performed equally with both cartoon characters and human faces.

Children had difficulty recognizing both cartoon characters and human faces.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main difference in performance between children and adults when identifying familiar cartoon characters in target-present line-ups?

Adults performed better in all aspects.

Children had higher false positive rates.

Adults were more prone to false negatives.

There was no significant difference between children and adults.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

According to the researchers, why did children make errors in correctly rejecting foils in target-absent line-ups despite being able to recognize the characters?

Faulty memory was responsible for the errors.

Cognitive factors caused the errors.

Children were more likely to be distracted.

Social factors led to the errors.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

In target-present line-ups, what was the success rate of children in identifying familiar cartoon characters?

0.99

0.23

0.95

0.66

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the success rate of adults in correctly rejecting foils in target-absent line-ups involving human faces?

0.74

0.23

0.95

0.70

6.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

According to the study, what was the main difference between children's performance in target-present line-ups and target-absent line-ups?

Children performed better in target-present line-ups.

Children performed better in target-absent line-ups.

Children had similar performance in both types of line-ups.

Children performed significantly worse in both types of line-ups.

7.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why did adults perform significantly better in both line-ups involving human faces compared to children?

Adults had better cognitive abilities.

Adults were more influenced by social factors.

Children had higher false negative rates.

Children were less familiar with the characters.