Quiz2 Ethics

According to the Preamble of the CPRA, what is Ethics?

• Ethics is the experiential manifestation of moral standards.

• Ethics are not minimally acceptable behaviors, but rather goals and ideals to which we should strive for.

• Ethics involves relating to moral action, conduct, motive or character; conforming to professional standards of conduct.

• Ethics comes from moral and social values and principles

According to the Preamble, the existence of a free and an independent society depends upon the recognition of the concept that justice is based on the: (3 words)

According to the video, What is Ethics?

[THIS WORD] are the things we hold to be good and therefore care about most deeply.

What is [THIS WORD]?

• Values

• Principles

• Beliefs

• Norms

According to the video, What is Ethics?

[THIS WORD] are the acceptable ways of getting the things that we value.

What is [THIS WORD]?

• Values

• Principles

• Beliefs

• Norms

According to the video, What is Ethics, How do we make choices when we find a conflict between values and principles? (Here they used the fictional scenario with Lee.) We should think about our:

• Beliefs

• Purpose

• Ethical Standards

• Moral Compass

According to the Preamble, An ethical lawyer is a lawyer possessed of THIS WORD.  

THIS WORD is the sum total of all the ethical values that every lawyer must embody and exhibit.

Review:

According to David Luban in "Integrity: its causes and cures, in Legal Ethics and Human Dignity"

When our conduct and our principles clash with each other, the result, social psychology teaches us, is:

• Moral disparity

• Action Discrepancy

• Fundamental attribution error

• Cognitive dissonance

Use of vulgar or offensive language in personal dealings is what type of offense under the CPRA?

• Serious

• Less serious

• Light

• None of the above

9. Fill in the blanks from the Lawyer’s Oath: I shall work towards promoting the rule of law in a regime of truth, justice, (blank), (blank), equality, and peace.

In Narag v. Narag, Mrs. Julieta B. Narag filed an administrative complaint for disbarment against her husband, Atty. Dominador M. Narag, whom she accused of having violated Canons 1 and 6, Rule 1.01 of the Code of Ethics for Lawyers by engaging in an illicit relationship with a former student. How long were Atty. and Mrs. Narag married at the time of the petition or as mentioned in the case?

• 27

• 38

• 32

• 26