Argumentative Texts Review

What is logical reasoning and why is it important in constructing an argument?

• Logical reasoning is the process of using superstitions and myths to support an argument. It is important in constructing an argument because it adds an element of mystery.

• Logical reasoning is the process of using rational thinking and evidence to support an argument. It is important in constructing an argument because it helps to ensure that the argument is sound, valid, and persuasive.

• Logical reasoning is the process of using random thoughts and guesswork to support an argument. It is important in constructing an argument because it makes the argument more interesting.

• Logical reasoning is the process of using emotions and opinions to support an argument. It is important in constructing an argument because it adds a personal touch.

Why is it important to include evidence and examples in an argumentative text?

• To support the claims and persuade the audience.

• To make the text longer and meet the word count requirement.

• To hide the weaknesses of the argument and avoid criticism.

• To confuse the audience and make the text more interesting.

How can logical fallacies weaken an argument? Provide an example.

• Logical fallacies can make an argument more convincing to the audience

• Logical fallacies can strengthen an argument by introducing errors in reasoning

• Logical fallacies can have no impact on an argument

• Logical fallacies can weaken an argument by introducing errors in reasoning or misleading the audience. For example, using ad hominem attacks instead of addressing the actual argument weakens the overall credibility of the argument.

Give an example of how evidence can strengthen a claim in an argumentative text.

• Evidence provides specific examples, statistics, expert opinions, or research findings that support the argument being made.

• Using evidence in an argumentative text is unnecessary

• Evidence has no impact on the strength of a claim

• Evidence weakens the argument by providing irrelevant information

How does persuasive language help in convincing the audience in an argumentative text?

• By using confusing language and jargon

• By using weak evidence and irrelevant examples

• By using offensive language and personal attacks

• By using emotional appeal, strong evidence, and convincing reasoning.

Explain the use of rhetorical devices in persuasive language with an example.

• Rhetorical devices are used to confuse the audience and make the argument less convincing.

• Rhetorical devices are only used in written language, not in spoken language.

• Rhetorical devices are used to persuade or influence the audience by appealing to emotions, logic, or credibility. For example, a speaker might use a metaphor to make a comparison that evokes a strong emotional response in the audience.

• Rhetorical devices are only used to appeal to logic, not emotions.

What are the key elements in organizing an argument effectively?

• Clear thesis statement, logical reasoning, supporting evidence, counterarguments, and a strong conclusion

• Contradictory statements, irrelevant information, and weak thesis

• Long-winded explanations, lack of evidence, and no conclusion

• Emotional appeals, vague statements, and personal attacks

Author's position is

• the author's claim or what the author supports.

• what the author does not claim to be true.

• the evidence used to support that claim.

• facts.

Provide a step-by-step guide on how to structure an argumentative essay.

• Begin with a thesis statement, followed by the conclusion, and then the introduction.

• Start with a conclusion, followed by body paragraphs, and end with an introduction.

• Start with an introduction, followed by a clear thesis statement, body paragraphs with supporting evidence, counterarguments, and a conclusion.

• Start with the body paragraphs, followed by the conclusion, and end with the thesis statement.

A counterclaim is-

• what the author supports and believes to be true.

• views or opinions that agree with the claim.

• opposing view that the writing discusses.

• evidence used to support the claim.