CER in Science

What is a claim in CER and how is it different from a hypothesis?

• A claim in CER is a question that has not been researched yet.

• A claim in CER is a statement that is not related to the research question and has no evidence to support it.

• A claim in CER is a statement that answers the research question and is supported by evidence.

• A claim in CER is a wild guess without any evidence to support it.

Provide an example of evidence that supports a claim in a scientific investigation.

• Personal opinions and beliefs

• Anecdotal stories from friends and family

• Information from social media

• Data from experiments, observations, or research studies

Tags

NGSS.HS-LS2-6

NGSS.HS-LS4-1

NGSS.HS-PS1-2

Explain the importance of reasoning in the CER framework.

• Logical connections have no impact on the CER framework

• Drawing conclusions without reasoning is sufficient in the CER framework

• Reasoning helps to analyze evidence, make logical connections, and draw valid conclusions.

• Reasoning is not important in the CER framework

Tags

NGSS.HS-LS3-2

How do scientists use evidence to support their claims in scientific investigations?

• By guessing and making assumptions

• By ignoring evidence and relying on intuition

• By using evidence such as data, observations, and experiments.

• By using evidence from unrelated sources

Tags

NGSS.HS-ESS3-5

NGSS.HS-LS4-1

NGSS.HS-PS1-2

Describe the process of constructing a scientific explanation based on evidence and reasoning.

• Ignoring data and making assumptions

• Gathering evidence, analyzing data, and using logical reasoning to form a conclusion

• Guessing without any evidence

• Relying solely on personal beliefs

Tags

NGSS.HS-LS2-6

NGSS.HS-PS1-2

Why is it important for a scientific explanation to be based on evidence?

• To align with personal beliefs

• To confuse people

• To ensure reliability and accuracy

• To make it more entertaining

Tags

NGSS.HS-ESS3-5

NGSS.HS-LS4-1

NGSS.HS-LS4-2

In what ways can evidence be collected and analyzed in a scientific investigation?

• Guessing and assuming

• Experiments, observations, surveys, interviews, and data analysis

• Using magic and supernatural powers

• Asking friends and family for their opinions

Tags

NGSS.MS-LS2-1

What role does reasoning play in evaluating the strength of evidence in a scientific investigation?

• Reasoning has no impact on evaluating evidence in a scientific investigation

• Reasoning is only important in non-scientific investigations

• The strength of evidence in a scientific investigation is determined by intuition, not reasoning

• Reasoning is essential for evaluating the strength of evidence in a scientific investigation.

Tags

NGSS.HS-ETS1-3

NGSS.HS-LS2-6

Explain how the CER framework helps scientists communicate their findings and conclusions.

• It provides a structured approach to organizing and presenting evidence, reasoning, and conclusions.

• It is only used for organizing data, not for drawing conclusions

• It only focuses on presenting evidence without any reasoning

• It has no impact on scientific communication

Tags

NGSS.HS-LS3-2

NGSS.HS-LS4-1

NGSS.HS-PS1-2

Provide an example of a scientific explanation that includes a claim, evidence, and reasoning.

• Theory of evolution by natural selection

• Theory of relativity by Albert Einstein

• Theory of gravity by Isaac Newton

• Big Bang theory

Tags

NGSS.HS-ESS1-2