Discussion Text-B.Inggris Tingkat Lanjut Fase F

What is the primary purpose of a discussion text?

• To inform the reader about a specific topic.

• To persuade the reader to take a particular stance.

• To entertain the reader with a captivating story.

• To present multiple viewpoints on an issue.

What distinguishes a discussion text from an argumentative text?

• Discussion texts present only one viewpoint.

• Argumentative texts aim to entertain readers.

• Discussion texts provide multiple perspectives on an issue.

• Argumentative texts focus solely on presenting facts.

Which of the following topics would be suitable for a discussion text?

• The life cycle of butterflies.

• The benefits of regular exercise.

• The pros and cons of social media usage.

• The process of photosynthesis in plants.

In a discussion text, what section is typically included after presenting various viewpoints?

• Introduction

• Conclusion

• Exposition

• Recommendation

What is the purpose of presenting counterarguments in a discussion text?

• To reinforce the author's viewpoint.

• To discredit opposing perspectives.

• To provide a balanced view of the issue.

• To confuse the reader with conflicting information.

Which of the following phrases would likely introduce a counterargument in a discussion text?

• "On the other hand,"

• "In conclusion,"

• "As a result,"

• "Firstly, secondly, thirdly,"

What type of language is commonly used in a discussion text?

• Emotional and subjective language.

• Formal and objective language.

• Slang and colloquial language.

• Ambiguous and vague language.

How does a discussion text conclude?

• By restating the author's viewpoint.

• By introducing a new topic for discussion.

• By summarizing the main arguments presented.

• By providing a definitive solution to the issue discussed.

What role do readers play in understanding a discussion text?

• They passively consume information without critically analyzing it.

• They actively engage with the text by considering different perspectives.

• They ignore any viewpoints that contradict their own beliefs.

• They rely solely on the author's opinion without forming their own judgments.

"Should Junk Food Be Banned in Schools?"

In recent years, there has been growing concern about the prevalence of junk food in schools and its impact on student's health. Many argue that junk food should be banned from school campuses to promote healthier eating habits and reduce the risk of obesity and related health issues among students. Proponents of the ban point to the high levels of sugar, salt, and unhealthy fats found in many junk food items, which contribute to poor nutrition and can lead to chronic diseases such as diabetes and heart disease. Additionally, the availability of junk food in school cafeterias and vending machines undermines efforts to educate students about the importance of a balanced diet and healthy lifestyle choices. However, opponents of the ban argue that prohibiting junk food in schools infringes on students' freedom of choice and may not effectively address the root causes of unhealthy eating habits. They contend that education and promoting healthier alternatives are more effective strategies for improving students' dietary habits than outright bans.

1. What is the primary argument presented in the text regarding junk food in schools?

• Junk food should be banned to promote healthier eating habits among students.

• Students should have the freedom to choose whether or not to consume junk food.

• Education about nutrition is more effective than banning junk food in schools.

• Junk food consumption has no significant impact on students' health.