Letter From Birmingham Jail

Why did Martin Luther King Jr. find himself in Birmingham as per his famous letter?

• He was there on the invitation of local clergy.

• He went to Birmingham to lead a civil rights march.

• His presence in Birmingham was due to his commitment to fighting segregation and injustice there.

• He was serving time in jail for his role in peaceful protests against racial discrimination.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

Which of the following does NOT represent a step in Martin Luther King Jr.'s strategy for nonviolent protest?

• Fact-finding to ascertain the injustice.

• Seeking to negotiate.

• Self-purification.

• Arming for self-defense.

Tags

CCSS.RL.2.6

CCSS.RL.8.3

What condition did Martin Luther King Jr. specify for a person from outside the United States to not be seen as an outsider in any American community?

• They must actively participate in community services.

• They must have a valid visa or residency status.

• They must show genuine concern for the community's welfare.

• They must own property within the community.

Tags

CCSS.RL.2.6

CCSS.RL.8.3

Following the failure of Birmingham's economic leaders to fulfill their promises, what course of action did Martin Luther King Jr. and his team undertake?

• They engaged in further discussions.

• They initiated direct action.

• They departed from Birmingham.

• They sought assistance from the federal government.

Tags

CCSS.RI.11-12.5

CCSS.RI.6.5

CCSS.RI.7.5

CCSS.RI.8.5

CCSS.RI.9-10.5

Why was the timing of the direct-action program strategically planned around the Easter season?

• To coincide with the completion of nonviolence training sessions.

• To leverage the economic significance of the season's high shopping activity.

• To initiate the program following Mr. Conner's electoral defeat.

• To benefit from the increased availability of volunteers during this period.

Tags

CCSS.RI.8.1

CCSS.RI.8.8

CCSS.RL.11-12.1

CCSS.RL.8.1

CCSS.RL.9-10.1

Why does the author argue against the preference for negotiation over direct action?

• Negotiation has historically failed to bring about significant change.

• Direct action is crucial for creating a crisis that compels negotiation.

• Engaging in nonviolent direct action carries fewer risks compared to negotiation.

• Only through direct action can political adversaries be truly overcome.

What is the main goal of engaging in nonviolent direct action, according to the author?

• To peacefully ensure compliance with laws.

• To foster an environment where prejudices and racism can be overcome.

• To secure victories in political campaigns.

• To advocate for change through violent means.

What does the author suggest about the likelihood of oppressors willingly granting freedom?

• It is a reliable method to achieve freedom.

• It is certain to succeed if given enough time.

• It is unlikely to happen without forcing the oppressor's hand.

• It is the method the author advocates for gaining freedom.

Tags

CCSS.RI. 9-10.6

CCSS.RI.11-12.6

CCSS.RI.8.9

CCSS.RL.11-12.6

CCSS.RL.9-10.6

By the conclusion of the letter, what sentiment is predominantly conveyed by the author?

• A hopeful outlook for swift action against the injustices mentioned.

• Contentment with the ongoing discussions and their current outcomes.

• A sense of urgency and frustration over the continuous injustice and lack of advancements.

• A neutral stance regarding the results of the advocacy efforts.

Tags

CCSS.RI. 9-10.6

CCSS.RI.8.6

CCSS.RL.11-12.6

CCSS.RL.8.6

CCSS.RL.9-10.6

How can one differentiate between just and unjust laws according to the provided text?

• Just laws are enacted by the majority, whereas unjust laws are enacted by the minority

• Just laws are in harmony with moral principles, while unjust laws conflict with them

• Unjust laws are officially legal, whereas just laws are not recognized as legal

• Just laws serve the interests of the majority, while unjust laws serve the interests of the minority